- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
U.S. Congratulates Karzai on Winning Second Term
U.S. Congratulates Karzai on Winning Second Term - FOXNews.com
KABUL -- The United States and its allies have congratulated President Hamid Karzai on winning a second term following a proclamation by the country's election commission.
The Monday ruling ends a two-and-a-half month ordeal wrought with fraud, back-room negotiations and worries that the Afghan government might never regain credibility.
So just yesterday was it, that the Obama administration was using the elections as an excuse to fiddle without a decision on Afghanistan? That they would not make a decision until after the elections?
Well. They are over. It's time to do right by those who are in harms way.
So just yesterday was it, that the Obama administration was using the elections as an excuse to fiddle without a decision on Afghanistan? That they would not make a decision until after the elections?
Well. They are over. It's time to do right by those who are in harms way.
what would you have obama say about karzai? obama has to deal with the elected leader of the country.exactly
just a few weeks ago our questions about a "credible partner" in afghanistan were enough to make the prez dither while disputing publicly his pentagon and cabinet
and today karzai's suddenly a-ok
rank amateurs occupy our white house
Hold on a damn minute, I thought Obama considered the Bush puppet Karzai a corrupt leader. Why the congratulations?So just yesterday was it, that the Obama administration was using the elections as an excuse to fiddle without a decision on Afghanistan? That they would not make a decision until after the elections?
Well. They are over. It's time to do right by those who are in harms way.
First it's a just war, now it isn't. First we're after al Qaeda, now we're throwing away lives for people that don't want us there. What mission do you think we're on? Liberals wanted bin Laden dead, dead, dead....like right now!What exactly is the goal in Afghanistan with the additional troops? Are we trying to remove the Taliban from control? Are we ending corruption in the government? Are we forcing the people of Afghan to, for once in their life, fight for control of their country from?
Or are you for just throwing troops lives away into a pointless war?
I don't see the point of "liberating" people who don't care to be liberated.
First it's a just war, now it isn't. First we're after al Qaeda, now we're throwing away lives for people that don't want us there. What mission do you think we're on? Liberals wanted bin Laden dead, dead, dead....like right now!
Hold on a damn minute, I thought Obama considered the Bush puppet Karzai a corrupt leader. Why the congratulations?
Or are you for just throwing troops lives away into a pointless war?
.
what would you have obama say about karzai? obama has to deal with the elected leader of the country.
Why pointless? Oil, gas, Caspian -- are very real and not at all pointless!
YouTube - The War on Terror or the Trans-Afghan Pipeline: YOU Decide Which is Real!
According to the article there wasn't any "congratulations". All that is said is that the US embassy said they "looked forward to working with Karzai to support reform and improve security".
That's that detailed FoxNews reporting.
KABUL -- The United States and its allies have congratulated President Hamid Karzai on winning a second term following a proclamation by the country's election commission.......
The British government and the United Nations also issued statements of congratulations.
The Admin is looking into switching strategies and focusing on Al-Q instead of the Taliban.
So now it's OK for the US to invade countries to take control of trade, economical, and geographical resources?
So now it's OK for the US to invade countries to take control of trade, economical, and geographical resources?
Not if he's really a cheater and a puppet.Congratulations Karzai. :shrug:
Afghanistan had its chance (twice) and the same person emerged victorious. Any decent Government would have to congratulate him, there is no other option.
What circus clowns we now have running the show, what hypocrites!
Well, maybe it's time then....cause Obama is "shifting strats" as Commander in Chief....to establish timelines from Congress. Benchmarks so we can all play Monday morning QB and decide whether we're winning or not. And speaking of winning, if we're switching strats probably means the current strat(that Obama sent McChrystal over to employ) isn't working or is being "lost."
Where is Harry Reid with the "war is lost?"
Where is John Murtha's cries of murder when Obama drones kill innocents?
Where are the funding games and timeline demands from this Congress?
Where is the first benchmark so prevalent and necessary during Iraq's tough days?
Oh...here......I found where the Democrats are:
"Whatever decision you make, we'll support it." from Harry Reid.:roll:
Oh look...Hillary:
"It's important that at the end of the day that the president makes a decision that he believes in,"
........a decision "he" believes in, is that what Hillary said? Remember when she thought there were 545 Commanders in Chief? Remember in 2007 when she tried to revoke her authorization for war in Iraq?
Oh looksy......this from the media dariling Robert Gibbs:
"The president is going to make a decision — popular or unpopular — based on what he thinks is in the best interests of the country,"
Really, Bob? Well, don't that make ALL of you hypocritical jokes! What circus clowns we now have running the show, what hypocrites!
So just yesterday was it, that the Obama administration was using the elections as an excuse to fiddle without a decision on Afghanistan? That they would not make a decision until after the elections?
Well. They are over. It's time to do right by those who are in harms way.
he was bush's puppet.Not if he's really a cheater and a puppet.
So now it's OK for the US to invade countries to take control of trade, economical, and geographical resources?
You didn't ask if its right, you asked what's the point.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?