- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
you will get no apology from me, as i asked you if this was your posistion, read for comprehension my friend, read for comprehension.
So stop comparing it to trickle down, we have no investment dollars issue.its not spending
No, the oil boom is still a demand driven event, they will not go for easily extractable oil if the costs involved do not make it profitable. These are international oil corps making a market driven choice, there is still enough demand on the open world market for this particular area to be a going concern.it is investments like investments that oil companies used to find and extract oil that caused the oil boom in Dakota which caused the McDonald worker to make 16 dollars an hours
so, is your argument that adding 195,000 to the job rolls is a bad thing? you seem to spend alot of time poo pooing those jobs, plus those jobs added over the last 30 plus months. does this good news bother you, or just piss you off that it is happening under a democratic president?I never said that the number 195000 was a lie but did put that number into context which doesn't seem to matter to an Obama supporter who doesn't understand how our economy works.
This stupid, there is no lack of capital in the US, there is plenty of investment funds in the US, corporations are cash rich and interest rates are at record lows.
Even with all of this AND QE, we still do not have corporations making investment in employment.....because demand is still depressed.
Capital IS NOT THE ISSUE.
so, is your argument that adding 195,000 to the job rolls is a bad thing? you seem to spend alot of time poo pooing those jobs, plus those jobs added over the last 30 plus months. does this good news bother you, or just piss you off that it is happening under a democratic president?
and those investments are in bonds commodities and futures not in areas that create jobs. business investments are at a low caused by the uncertainty in business thanks in part by Obama careThis stupid, there is no lack of capital in the US, there is plenty of investment funds in the US, corporations are cash rich and interest rates are at record lows.
Even with all of this AND QE, we still do not have corporations making investment in employment.....because demand is still depressed.
Capital IS NOT THE ISSUE.
so, is your argument that adding 195,000 to the job rolls is a bad thing? you seem to spend alot of time poo pooing those jobs, plus those jobs added over the last 30 plus months. does this good news bother you, or just piss you off that it is happening under a democratic president?
a 'drop in the bucket' eh? even over the last 30plus months? or is 30 plus months just a 'drop in the bucket'? as for the rest, childish spiel that you try to use to get a rise out of people...just shows you have a losing argument.No, it is a drop in the bucket and most of them are part time employees, the new Obama economy. What pisses me off is the ignorance of liberal Obama supporters who have no idea what drives the U.S. Economy and supports someone who doesn't have a clue how our economy works either.
with out investments and the means to make a profit off those investments there wouldn't be oil exploration and extraction you need both the demand and the initial capitol to supply that demand.
It is demand driven, not investment driven, you have it all backwards.
No chit....this is just more of the same.with out investments and the means to make a profit off those investments there wouldn't be oil exploration and extraction you need both the demand and the initial capitol to supply that demand
what pisses me off, is fact we used to manufacture finished goods for the rest of the world, now the rest of the world manufactures finished goods for us. And that was with much higher taxes.No, it is a drop in the bucket and most of them are part time employees, the new Obama economy. What pisses me off is the ignorance of liberal Obama supporters who have no idea what drives the U.S. Economy and supports someone who doesn't have a clue how our economy works either.
The government accidentally incentivizing part time employment could be one of the many problems.
If Bush had no effect on the (recessionary) economy, then neither has Obama.No, it is a drop in the bucket and most of them are part time employees, the new Obama economy. What pisses me off is the ignorance of liberal Obama supporters who have no idea what drives the U.S. Economy and supports someone who doesn't have a clue how our economy works either.
a 'drop in the bucket' eh? even over the last 30plus months? or is 30 plus months just a 'drop in the bucket'? as for the rest, childish spiel that you try to use to get a rise out of people...just shows you have a losing argument.
No chit....this is just more of the same.
News Flash...investment capital is not the issue, you keep avoiding the issue.....DEMAND.
If Bush had no effect on the (recessionary) economy, then neither has Obama.
You can't have it both ways, con.
QE is not an investment in "commodities or futures".it is when you are safer and have a better return investing in bonds commodities and futures that doesnt create jobs. business investments are at a low caused by the uncertainty in business thanks in part by Obama care
No chit, I didn't say he was.Bush isn't in office
See the above responseBush wasn't on the ballot in 2008,
Wrong, he is responsible for much of the results of the aftermath of his recession.Bush didn't generate the results we have today.
No chit, I didn't say he was.
See the above response
Wrong, he is responsible for much of the results of the aftermath of his recession.
You don't get to say Bush had no effect on the economy while saying Obama does.
Nope, you are missing the point, you have constantly said that Bush had no effect upon the economy of his day, ie 2001-2009, yet Obama does have an effect in his day, 2009 through to today.Aw, yes, Bush is responsible for the economic conditions today over 4 years after leaving office thanks mostly to the outstanding leadership qualities of Obama and the failure of Obama supporters to understand leadership. You Obama supporters are quite interesting.
i'm willing to bet if 30 plus months of adding jobs had happened under a republican president, you would be telling us how good adding these jobs is.Yep, 2 million fewer people working than when the recession started, four years after the recession ended and we have 177,000 fewer unemployed all at a cost of over 6 trillion but what the hell, it is someone else's money? Then let's not forget the 1.8% GDP growth annualized for 2013 after the first quarter? Booming economy?
Nope, you are missing the point, you have constantly said that Bush had no effect upon the economy of his day, ie 2001-2009, yet Obama does have an effect in his day, 2009 through to today.
You don't get to play both side of the same argument.
QE is not an investment in "commodities or futures".
Clueless.
i'm willing to bet if 30 plus months of adding jobs had happened under a republican president, you would be telling us how good adding these jobs is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?