- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 9,869
- Reaction score
- 3,495
- Location
- Los Angeles area
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Except it would be the GOP Isolationist Collectivists you'd be talking about in the 1930s who behaved EXACTLY as you accused current liberals. Not to mention the GOPs in Congress who actively supported Hitler and Germany in the 1930s. So much for YER rewrite .
I will tell you that I'm damn sure not interested in fighting the Muslim religion for that bitches right to color cartoon caricatures of Mohamed. She'll need the buffoons in her army for that.
I quoted her from the NY Times. If you don't believe it the onus is on you to disprove them.
Those school girls in Afghanistan deserved getting acid thrown in their faces, serves them right for getting all uppity and wanting to read.
Im shocked you want to silence a dissenting viewpoint. :lol:
The problem isnt Geller, its a group that thinks violence is acceptable.
If you disagree, maybe the US isn't the country for you?
So you're one of those who believe terrorists haven't struck before Pam Geller came along, huh? In fact they are out to kill you regardless of what Geller has to say. In fact she's giving you a head's up.And you need to back off saying that Geller's garbage won't get people slaughtered .
Right. Liberty on a leash.I haven't ever said that. In fact, just once while you're here participating, actually pay attention. I've clearly stated that I don't want government restrictions on Geller or anyone else. I just want her to be responsible with her liberties.
I don't think you needed to tell anyone here that you are not interested in fighting. I don't know what "the buffoons in her army" refers to, but I wouldn't be surprised if you meant to insult the brave members of the U.S. Army.
Right. Liberty on a leash.
There are thousands of pictures of Mohammed and this idea that no one can draw him is a recent phenomenon, much like the Burka in Iran or the west. Mohammed Image ArchiveLol. Though anybody willing to stand before a stranger and kill or be killed, is brave, I wasn't speaking of the US army but rather her army of supporters, colouring cartoons of Mohamed like third graders, and really displaying their adolescent maturity by doing so for no other reason then to make an entire group of people whom they hate, pissed off. And in the almighty name of the first amendment. As though abusing the intent of our bill of rights to engage in hate and mean spirited expression makes them patriots, and brave.
So "Liberty on a Leash" applies then.Yes, if you were an American you would understand the responsibilities that accompany our People's Bill of Rights. Nobody can do whatever they want here, there are restrictions, rules and limitations, even to the things we say. And there's even limitations on my freedom of speech right here at DP where yourself and I are communicating. I can't simply call you what I'd like to call you...................not without paying a price anyway, eh? A security guard paid the price for Geller's irresponsible manner of expressing her liberty. She has the "right" to be ugly, provocative, mean spirited in her little amateurish display, but she has to reap the consequences. Wonder if she's been to see the injured guard and his family or not. If so, I really wonder what she told them.
Watch and learn everybody...
https://youtu.be/49ERntssX4o
I see Gutfield's such a defender of free speech he only invited people to discuss the matter who agreed 100% with him. That clip taught me only one thing: how not to conduct a TV news debate.
The Five is a daily TV show. He didn't "invite" people to interview. Those are the regular hosts. And Juan Williams does not agree with Greg Gutfeld at all.
I see. It's not a debate programme but an agree-a-thon. Great advert for free speech.
I see. It's not a debate programme but an agree-a-thon. Great advert for free speech.
I see. It's not a debate programme but an agree-a-thon. Great advert for free speech.
Much like MSNBC or The Young Turks? Lol
I haven't ever said that. In fact, just once while you're here participating, actually pay attention. I've clearly stated that I don't want government restrictions on Geller or anyone else. I just want her to be responsible with her liberties.
There are thousands of pictures of Mohammed and this idea that no one can draw him is a recent phenomenon, much like the Burka in Iran or the west. Mohammed Image Archive
I see. It's not a debate programme but an agree-a-thon. Great advert for free speech.
Liberals are all for debate unless you disagree with them. Liberals are all for freedom of speech unless they aren't offended by it. Liberals are not the ideology for freedom. Much like a theocrisy in the Middle East.
And ever notice how it's always muslims who try to kill people they disagree with? When's the last time a Christian beheaded or blew themselves up? I dunno. Just a few thoughts in a free country... Supposedly
Christians have killed their fair share of people that they disagreed with. Right now it's the Muslims doing a lot of that, but it's just as ugly. Also, I see liberals here debating all the time, so I don't know what you mean, but stick around and you'll see. Otherwise, liberals and conservatives alike have shared the freedoms that "the founders" established, and there's no point in you claiming that liberals don't like freedom. It could easily be argued that absent any value otherwise, Geller's expression is hate speech, which certainly can be prosecuted. And liberals are inclined towards an opposite ideology than ME theocracies that you suggest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?