Montecresto
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2013
- Messages
- 24,561
- Reaction score
- 5,507
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You realize that depictions of Mohammed cartoon or otherwise carry the same punishment ( execution ) that being a Homosexual does.
Anyway, the real story is ISIS in the United States and their claim that this attack is just the first of many.
Lets see if you can follow this, although we already know that you can't:
Do you have evidence the sharia courts there have executed anyone in modern times for apostasy? Do you have links of denied church applications to the ministry/government agency/whatever they do ?
Yeah, I realise that. I also realise it's not a necessary form of free speech. But like I said, the morons coloured their cartoon, exercised their free speech and a guard has been shot for it, nice.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596011 said:I see you're still having trouble with this. OCD much?
Maybe you should take up your own advise of therapy.
nice.. don't blame the violent extremists.. blame the people exercising their speech.
lefties are adorable that way. :roll:
Hit a nerve because you can't read? :lol:
I didn't say that she is guilty of a crime. I said that she holds some blame.
If a person knowingly does something that they know, and has in the past, specifically been targeted with violence and they do it anyway then they are partially to blame.
You see common sense and responsiblity as delicate sensibilities and I see them as reasonable responses.
You realize that depictions of Mohammed cartoon or otherwise carry the same punishment ( execution ) that being a Homosexual does.
Anyway, the real story is ISIS in the United States and their claim that this attack is just the first of many.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596032 said:So she's partially to blame for the violence? Wow...
Blaming her for being even partially responsible for the violence is mutually exclusive with reasonable.
Yeah, I realise that. I also realise it's not a necessary form of free speech. But like I said, the morons coloured their cartoon, exercised their free speech and a guard has been shot for it, nice.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596056 said:So its the cartoonists fault the Muslims attempted to murder the guard?
I didn't say that she was partially responsible for the violence... but you continue to fail at reading little buddy. :lol:
If a person knowingly does something that they know, and has in the past, specifically been targeted with violence and they do it anyway then they are partially to blame.
On the one hand, I would tend to agree that the focus of the meeting/conference was kinda...childish.A security guard was injured. This could have been far worse than it was. Anyway, yeah, in this forum, it is for me to say that just because I have a right to call you an asshole as an expression of free speech (besides being a violation of board rules) it's not expedient. I'm an atheist but I wouldn't gratuitously offend a Christian or a Muslim. This was senseless and didn't end well. But hey, the kiddos with their crayons exercised their free speech, yippee!
:roll: No, it is simply stupid that they felt they needed to exercise "free speech" like they did. Do you purposely say offensive things to people just because you want to? No, because common decency acts as a barrier to being a rude asshole. Does this stupid lady or her group deserve blame for the violence? No... are they stupid ****ing morons that should have not been intentionally disrespectful assholes that knew that many Muslims would be very offended and that violence might occur? Hell ****ing yes. Only a complete dip**** would not understand this... (not calling you one just to be clear mods)
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596086 said:Another idiotic response...
You wrote this:
Partially to blame? Blame for what? What happened that she should be blamed for? Didn't violence occur? So what is she to blame for if not that?
I anticipate another deflection.
Μολὼν λαβέ;1064596109 said:Found your white flag.
:surrender
Yes, both of these muslim scum....just joined ISIS!
Two shot dead outside Muhammad Art Exhibit in Garland
This was at a facility in Garland, Texas, near Dallas.
I gather this was an exhibit of artwork that depicts Muhammad, a la Charlie Hebdo, in defiance of radical Muslims and in affirmation of freedom of speech.
Two guys drove up armed with guns and explosives, opened fire, and were killed straight away by return fire.
It's a bad idea to go gunning for any group of Texans without a lot of firepower.
I'm checking, hold on. Nope, the thread title here is specifically about the shootingHow obtuse can you be?
People are claiming that criticizing this bigoted cartoon festival is somehow off base because of the First Amendment. The shooting is a completely unrelated issue.
Just like the rape victim who wore the shirt skirt apparently.I didn't say that she is guilty of a crime. I said that she holds some blame. Learn to read.
On the one hand, I would tend to agree that the focus of the meeting/conference was kinda...childish.
But the 1st A protects the right of everyone to speak freely....except in specific circumstances, such as "shouting fire in a crowded theater".
I'd like to be there when you suggested that to the security guards family, lol.
You realize that depictions of Mohammed cartoon or otherwise carry the same punishment ( execution ) that being a Homosexual does.
Anyway, the real story is ISIS in the United States and their claim that this attack is just the first of many.
Just like the rape victim who wore the shirt skirt apparently.
He's saying that the argument about criticizing the cartoon festival being off base because 1st A is an unrelated argument to the shooting.I'm checking, hold on. Nope, the thread title here is specifically about the shooting
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?