• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Twitter's old guard slammed after file dump reveals suppression: 'Colluded' to 'steal away your country'

Anthony60

Special bubble
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
28,772
Reaction score
10,477
Location
Northern New Jersey
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Twitter Dump
I didn't see a new thread on this from yesterday...
Another batch of stuff from twitter doing the bidding of the Democrat party...
Keeping the American people in the dark, for the benefit of Democrats, and lying about it...

Conservatives who were affected by Twitter's prior managements' alleged suppression of right-leaning or counter-establishment thought sounded off Thursday on Fox News.

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk spoke to "Tucker Carlson Tonight" amid the latest installment of the "Twitter Files" dump under new CEO Elon Musk.

Kirk's name came up in the latest tranche, with documents purporting to show his account being placed on "Do Not Amplify" status under the social media giant's prior management.


Kirk said he had suspected some sort of silent suppression but did not know the extent of it until journalist Bari Weiss began sharing the latest tranche late Thursday.
 

Shut down Twitter! LMAO.. The “brilliant” business man, my ass….
 
Steal away your country?
Good Lord! D'ya think maybe some Americans are just way too heavily invested in social media?
Look up from your screens, folks! Put down your devices and try to do something real, something unvirtual.
If you can even remember how.
 
I think the real thing here is the assumption Twitter and other social media platforms are the exclusive source by which Americans determine which candidates they vote for.
 
Of course this is just more idiotic whining from the orange slob. Nobody gives a shit about the hunter laptop story outside of the cult. And he had all those votes regardless.
 
Right wing conspiracy theories are more incoherent every day.
 
Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk spoke to "Tucker Carlson Tonight"
Bastions of responsible journalism, right? Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson?

Poor Anthony60, reduced to pushing right wing propaganda....you could just let a bot do it, at least then you wouldn't be directly tied to such nonsense.
 
Bastions of responsible journalism, right? Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson?

Poor Anthony60, reduced to pushing right wing propaganda....you could just let a bot do it, at least then you wouldn't be directly tied to such nonsense.

Geezus. You know I like you @Anthony60 (in spite of your piss poor taste in hockey teams), but seriously? Kirk and Carlson?
 

More baseless bullshit. Private companies are not required to allow hate speech or misinformation to be shared.

Musk is doing this because he's a Nazi asshole who is working for the reich-wing to destroy Twitter out of vengeance.
 
More baseless bullshit. Private companies are not required to allow hate speech or misinformation to be shared.

Musk is doing this because he's a Nazi asshole who is working for the reich-wing to destroy Twitter out of vengeance.

Of course, some companies and individuals traffic in it.
 
Unless Republicans are going to demand these people face criminal prosecution, and I do mean demand it. This is all nothing but political theater.
 
Unless Republicans are going to demand these people face criminal prosecution, and I do mean demand it. This is all nothing but political theater.

Good Lord, of course its political theater. Why do you think you're only hearing about one side wanting material censored?
 
I think the real thing here is the assumption Twitter and other social media platforms are the exclusive source by which Americans determine which candidates they vote for.
I don't think anyone views those platforms as EXCLUSIVE sources.

But using your logic, why would the democrat party push so hard to convince Twitter to choose to censor almost exclusively messages that did not comport with the democrat party narrative? I mean if it has such little impact.
Dems love censorship - as long as they are doing the censoring.
Truth!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…