Another stupid and dishonest post from you. Lets start here: Which people are arguing that businesses can turn away people for being black?A private corporation holding users to their terms of service is not a dictatorship. Could Trump supporters be any more entitled or self-victimizing?
The same clowns try to argue a business can turn away people for being black or gay. Cry harder for me.
Conservatives for the past 230 years. Are you really so dishonest that you're really claiming that there aren't a substantial number of conservatives who are against public accommodation laws? What was all that whining about the baker with a gay customer?Another stupid and dishonest post from you. Lets start here: Which people are arguing that businesses can turn away people for being black?
Name a couple.Conservatives for the past 230 years. Are you really so dishonest that you're really claiming that there aren't a substantial number of conservatives who are against public accommodation laws? What was all that whining about the baker with a gay customer?
You voted on someone said if you are not voting on me you are not black enough, black enough?A private corporation holding users to their terms of service is not a dictatorship. Could Trump supporters be any more entitled or self-victimizing?
The same clowns try to argue a business can turn away people for being black or gay. Cry harder for me.
Name a couple.
You voted on someone said if you are not voting on me you are not black enough, black enough?
I asked about black people, and you brought up something about gays that doesnt even address the issue. Do you think all black people are gay or are you just being dishonest again.
Now, time for you to keep gas lighting and pretending there aren't any Republicans who oppose public accommodation laws.
Can a private business refuse to do business with people who violate their terms of service or not? Why not have the government force Twitter to allow Trump supporters to call for the murder of politicians and journalists on their platform?
I'm not going to let you sit there and gaslight pretending conservatives haven't consistently opposed public accommodation laws. If baking a cake for black people "violates Joe baker's religion" , mainstream conservative thought supports turning him away.I asked about black people, and you brought up something about gays that doesnt even address the issue. Do you think all black people are gay or are you just being dishonest again.
Who made such an argument? Give me a couple names or just admit you are lying and stop embarrassing yourself.I'm not going to let you sit there and gaslight pretending conservatives haven't consistently opposed public accommodation laws. If baking a cake for black people "violates Joe baker's religion" , mainstream conservative thought supports turning him away.
In an attempt to steer you back on topic, why don't you explain how Trump and his supporters have a right to violate the terms of service of a private company.
Another stupid and dishonest post from you. Lets start here: Which people are arguing that businesses can turn away people for being black?
Oh? So you're saying a business open to the public doesn't get to choose their customers based on their arbitrarily defined religion? You disagree with the Republican party. I'm glad we've found something you agree with me on.Who made such an argument? Give me a couple names or just admit you are lying and stop embarrassing yourself.
If this is your way of admitting your post was a lie, then we can both agree on that at least.Oh? So you're saying a business open to the public doesn't get to choose their customers based on their arbitrarily defined religion? You disagree with the Republican party. I'm glad we've found something you agree with me on.
If you'd like to talk about the actual topic of the thread, let me know.
You're the guy claiming Republicans have never claimed religious exemptions for businesses serving specific customers. Talk about dishonest!If this is your way of admitting your post was a lie, then we can both agree on that at least.
What about him?? The Supreme court sided with him. He's an individual, not some huge corporation seeking a monopoly and exclusivity by hampering other bakers. Twitter, Amazon, Facebook and Google exploit individuals through communication, in some cases goods, and the establishment and perpetuation of relationships on which people become reliant, particularly now through Covid. What they have done is a disgrace. Regarding the baker, I would have no problem baking for gay folks if I could bake. But that said, I have other personal barriers. I don't like hunting. I find it objectionable, so when I'm getting estimates for a job and somebody brags about animals that he or she killed, I don't hire that person. I'm not going fund an individual's killing expedition which is my prerogative as an American citizen. But I'm not a monopoly. I'm not trying to bar other people from hiring that person nor am I on a smear campaign or trying to shut that person up or stop him or her from exercising the right to go out and kill some innocent creature. It's legal but I'm not going to personally support it. And it may surprise you to know that there are many gays that ARE conservative, and that many conservatives support gay rights. Thanks!!Conservatives for the past 230 years. Are you really so dishonest that you're really claiming that there aren't a substantial number of conservatives who are against public accommodation laws? What was all that whining about the baker with a gay customer?
Karma at it best!
Not even the stock market likes what dems do turning America into dictatorship!
A private corporation holding users to their terms of service is not a dictatorship. Could Trump supporters be any more entitled or self-victimizing?
The same clowns try to argue a business can turn away people for being black or gay. Cry harder for me.
Karma at it best!
Not even the stock market likes what dems do turning America into dictatorship!
if twitter can only hold SOME of their users to the terms of service and not others, basically doing what they like, then shareholders can hold their stock price to account.
And plenty of people not named Donald Trump have gotten the same. But nobody cried about them.
yeah , all kinds of conservatives that twitter disagrees with.
Karma at it best!
Not even the stock market likes what dems do turning America into dictatorship!
They can go to Parler.
not right now, not till they find a new cloud system to host them
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?