• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tucker Carlson says Trump administration is using Charlie Kirk’s killing to trample First Amendment

Lord of Planar said:
That's right. Refuse to explain. Slander me and do not supply what I request.

Pathetic....

Go ahead. Run away...
Click to expand...
OMG. Not another "whiny ass" Trump worshipper.
And yes, Magas are pathetic. See, you probably thought that we wouldn't agree on anything......lol
 
The AntiDonald said:
It's not free if you're going to be charged with a crime for saying it.
Click to expand...
The First Amendment generally protects speakers from government coercion. But for reasons the Supreme Court never persuasively explained, broadcasters have junior-varsity First Amendment rights. They can lose their licenses if they fail to operate in the “public interest”—a vague standard that gives the FCC wide discretion. This is why broadcast television looks and feels different from unregulated services like HBO, Netflix, or YouTube.​

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom