• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tsikhanouskaya's grim warning: Russia might attack the Baltic States from Belarus

joluoto said:

Russia might use Belarus to attack the Baltics, but Belarusians will not do it, Tsikhanouskaya says​

In any Russian attack on Eastern Europe, closing the Suwalki gap between Belarus and Kaliningrad would be one of Russia's first moves.
Click to expand...
No need to fight. Russia can simply exchange some territory to build a suitable road from Belorussia to Kaliningrad. The road will not take much land. A passages from Poland to Lithuania can be organized in such way that will preserve a necessary traffic between these two countries. Everybody will be happy.
 
dandolo2k said:
Of course USSR wasn't legally dissolved! The constitution of the USSR didn't contain any mention or reference to "dissolution".
Therefore the whole process was totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Click to expand...
You'll have to go back in time to undo their mistakes,lol, the USSR's been dead for 30 years.
 
soap box said:
You'll have to go back in time to undo their mistakes,lol, the USSR's been dead for 30 years.
Click to expand...
And Ukraine is dead for 10+ years , since 2014. So is this a big difference? Dead is the USSR or not dead, what was done ILLEGALLY must be fixed.
 
dandolo2k said:
Of course USSR wasn't legally dissolved! The constitution of the USSR didn't contain any mention or reference to "dissolution".
Therefore the whole process was totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Click to expand...
It failed.

Like all things Russian, it was doomed from the beginning.
 
dandolo2k said:
And Ukraine is dead for 10+ years , since 2014. So is this a big difference? Dead is the USSR or not dead, what was done ILLEGALLY must be fixed.
Click to expand...
It is being fixed. You're losing men at something like twice the average rate right now.
 
dandolo2k said:
And Ukraine is dead for 10+ years , since 2014. So is this a big difference? Dead is the USSR or not dead, what was done ILLEGALLY must be fixed.
Click to expand...

I can prove the Soviet Union is dead. They don't have an Olympic team .



LOL
 
Hamish Howl said:
It failed.

Like all things Russian, it was doomed from the beginning.
Click to expand...
Except that’s objectively untrue.

The point of no return for the USSR was roughly the early to mid 1970s. Saying “it was doomed from the beginning” just flat out isn’t true.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Except that’s objectively untrue.

The point of no return for the USSR was roughly the early to mid 1970s. Saying “it was doomed from the beginning” just flat out isn’t true.
Click to expand...
It was. The entire system relied on one man being able to control the whole apparatus. It was downhill after Kruschev.
 
Hamish Howl said:
It was. The entire system relied on one man being able to control the whole apparatus. It was downhill after Kruschev.
Click to expand...
Other countries have existed under such conditions for decades, even centuries. Autocracy is nothing new, and saying it was “inevitably doomed” is foolish.
 
I see nothing wrong with trying to reconquer the Baltic states. The Baltic states have been rightful Russian territory for centuries, and so they are fake countries in the grand scheme of history. If this happen, this will just be a case of a country trying to reconquer a rebellious province.
 
This would be similar to Serbia trying to reconquer Croatia and Bosnia. These rightful Serbian lands illegally declared independence. The only difference is that the globalists cannot bully Russia the same way they bullied Serbia.
 
Oh no! Not the end of the world again!

I've still got so much money to spend before drowning in a spa.
 
aofie said:
Oh no! Not the end of the world again!

I've still got so much money to spend before drowning in a spa.
Click to expand...
If you knew any water chemistry, you wouldn't mess with spas.

Serious talk.
 
aofie said:
Why not?

I'm thinking it's a comfy womfy way to go out.
Click to expand...
Because people pee in spas, and the chlorine turns into chloramine, which is shit at wiping out bugs (microorganisms), and then the spa is basically a petri dish/bug factory that you dip your bits in.

Back in 2006, I had to model - not kidding - how many people have to pee in a spa and in an olympic sized pool to crash the chlorine. It takes a whole lot of people to crash a pool. It takes five (5) people to crash a spa.
 

Yeah but I intend to die in said spa.

Then literally none of that matters.
 
aofie said:
Yeah but I intend to die in said spa.

Then literally none of that matters.
Click to expand...
If you wish to drown in pee and Cryptosporidium, I am not here to tell you no.
 
aofie said:
You just did for some reason.
Click to expand...
I made a suggestion.

I am not here to order people around. I expect to get paid for that sort of thing.
 
BogJeSrbin said:
This would be similar to Serbia trying to reconquer Croatia and Bosnia. These rightful Serbian lands illegally declared independence. The only difference is that the globalists cannot bully Russia the same way they bullied Serbia.
Click to expand...

Do the people in the Baltics get to decide what happens next?
 

BogJeSrbin said:
This would be similar to Serbia trying to reconquer Croatia and Bosnia. These rightful Serbian lands illegally declared independence. The only difference is that the globalists cannot bully Russia the same way they bullied Serbia.
Click to expand...
Wow. And other people have no right to independence, right? Croatia btw has never been part of Serbia, but part of Yugoslavia. The same goes for Bosnia. It was part of Yugoslavia, not Serbia. Yugoslavia does not exist anymore. And if you go back to the Middle Ages Bosnia was split between Serbia and Croatia in the early days, with Croatia being the suzerain of most of the territory, but later Hungary seized control of Bosnia, but when Hungarian control weakened in the 1100s, the Bans of Bosnia started to act independently, becoming a independent kingdom (there was some funny things going on with both the Western and Eastern church that made the Bosnian church independent of both, but that's a sidenote). Then the Ottomans swallowed Bosnia, then it was a Habsburg possession, and then it was part of Yugoslavia. Tell me again how it's Serbian clay.

Regarding the Baltic States, they were a part of the Russian Empire, true. But they became independent when the Russian Empire collapsed in 1917. Then they were occupied and forcedly annexed into the USSR during World War 2, but note they were annexed as SSRs. That means they were not part of the Russian SSR, and thus not part of Russia. So the Baltic States has not been Russian territory since 1917. They have been Soviet terrirtory (as in illegally occupied by the USSR), but the USSR was not Russia, and the USSR does not exist anymore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.