• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's personal banking information handed over to Robert Mueller

Status
Not open for further replies.

WH lawyers and staff are trying to keep Trump tethered as best they can till it's time to hit the button under the conference table. Everybody in Washington knows Trump is compromised by Russian intelligence to include finance, money, personally -- completely. It's completely unacceptable in a Potus. Trump is a nuclear nutcase besides.

wow...you missed your calling

Your name should be Kreskin...and you should be charging by the hour for forecasting the future

You got a set of tarot cards? Or is this a crystal ball thingie?

You been booked by MSNBC yet? With the prognostications, they would love you....well until you got them sued that is....
 
It does get tiresome to have to explain things to you. That, on top of the boredom your posts produce.


Sent from my iPhone X using Telepathy.

Keep trying to find those transcripts! If you can just figure out which presidents transcripts that is.....
 

As of when you wrote that comment last night, it doesn't appear that Mueller actually subpoenaed those bank records.
What do you make of that?

BUT, and here is the interesting thing, it does appear that Mueller may have a bunch of political hacks, who left quite interesting trails, on his investigative team.
He had been close to them, do you think he considered that their backgrounds would be problematic if uncovered?
You know ... make his investigation results suspect?
Or maybe you haven't heard about that.
 
Deutsche Bank doesn't deny that they were subpoenaed.

There was one person on the Mueller team that had political ties and he was fired. So, what's the problem, Mueller has high integrity standards? The narrative that Mueller's investigative team are a bunch of Democratic hacks out to get Trump is a fictional work.
 
Ah, the liberal mind at work. “Flynn chose to ruin himself”. That’s sickening.


Sent from my iPhone X using Telepathy.

When you commit a crime, you run the risk of being caught, having legal fees, court fines, and jail. Yes. He chose to commit crimes so he chose to ruin himself.
 

The Palmer report?? YOu got to be kidding. That blog is insane. I would not use that as a source for anything.
 
Keep up little one. They were caught money laundering millions for the Russians.

What does that have to do with this case?

Do you have a connection or are you dreaming one up?
 
And how would you know?

Not to sound arrogant, but I just do. Just like a bunch of other things they put out there about Trump that turned up to be false. This will be no different.
 

...And as it turns out, the report of subpoenaed bank records is false. Imagine that. So there isn't any investigation into mirror trade transactions that, at the very least, require bank records. You've been had, and I bet it isn't the first time.
 

lol, you have no proof they're false, though, aside from the fact that Trump's team said so.
 
lol, you have no proof they're false, though, aside from the fact that Trump's team said so.

Seems the bank(s) involved have confirmed that no records have been subpoenaed.

But like you, I suspect that copies of those records have been placed for interested parties in a brown paper bag which is under a park bench near a particular light in Central Park.
 
Just give me the man, and I'll find a crime. That's pretty much how Mueller is operating.

You are simultaneously slinging accusations of bias AND signalling that you will consider any allegation to be fraudulent (aka, signalling your own massive bias).



Wish I could still be amazed by that kind of thing. You do realize that if they make allegations, they'll be putting their facts forth publicly? If they want to convict a Trump associate, they'll have to be in federal court, in which the defendant enjoys the right to a public trial. If they want to recommend impeachment, they'll have to turn everything over to congress and you'll get to see debates on C-Spann or whatever.

This isn't some troika, so drop the stupid act.
 
meanwhile, despite never doing anything other than governmental service work, the clintons and obamas are worth mega millions.

do not look at trump!



I said do not look at trump!
 

I suggest you make your peace with the fact that bank records were subpoenaed and move forward. We're both adults here -- you know that's where this is going.
 
Trump gives every indication that he is going to fight, lay in a good store of popcorn.....

but as we now know, he can't fight - he has bone spurs
 
I suggest you make your peace with the fact that bank records were subpoenaed and move forward. We're both adults here -- you know that's where this is going.

I'm not saying that won't happen. That could and perhaps likely will happen. But the banks involved and the WH say no subpoena has been received, and I can't think of a reason they would deny something like that. Additionally, the issuance of a subpoena doesn't automatically result in the delivery of such records. What I have noticed is that articles claiming a subpoena has been issued - and there are a bunch of them - cite the ubiquitous "anonymus sources". Such sources could claim anonymity to avoid the illegality of a leak, or they could be reporting a rumor, or they could be making stuff up. I don't want to rain on anyone's parade here, but it may be a little too early to get the floats and confetti out. You're confused if you believe this affects me in any way other than the interest in the progress of this investigation and the veracity of the report that has so many giddy just now.
 
So, IOW, you know nothing. Got it. Thanks.

If that's the case, neither do you. But I know my stance on the matter has substance, logic, and truth, while yours doesn't. Hence that's why I'm confident that there's nothing there, but the farce that we call the Mueller Investigation will continue and will further produce lies. Especially when we found out that some members of the team were already anti-Trump from the get go.
 
Seems the bank(s) involved have confirmed that no records have been subpoenaed.

No, it seems that Trump's lawyer is claiming this. The bank has never "confirmed that no records have been subpoenaed". This is all DB has said on the matter:

 

LOL! You and logic remain rather hiarlious unacquainted. Why try and reference something you don't understand?

And your 'truth' is merely your empty and breathless conjecture.

What else do you have?
 

This is a pointless discussion, because it will be found that the bank was very much subpoenaed and we'll be discussing that before long. So why not just skip past this nonsense and discuss the inevitable next chapter of this?
 

Well one things for sure it is far more relevant to look through bank records of.a German bank with Russian ties than to look in a closet for a blue dress with a stain.

Who knows may trumps will be a read dress.

Of course anything they find whether money laundering, coordination or or a seamen stained dress his cult members will excuse him.

After all the rnc is just endorsed a pedophile for office.

They have proven they are morally corrupt and willing to crawl as low as needed in the name of the party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…