Gulf of America! High-****ing-larious! You guys actually say that?You do realize that US Navy assets have supported SOUTHCOM for years, right? The USS Cole has already returned from the 5th Fleet AOR. They are now starting to get trained up for their next deployment. Deploying to the Gulf of America and Caribbean allows them to use the ships systems to help interdict smugglers and train without Houthis tossing missiles at them.
the Gulf of America
You do realize that US Navy assets have supported SOUTHCOM for years, right? The USS Cole has already returned from the 5th Fleet AOR. They are now starting to get trained up for their next deployment. Deploying to the Gulf of America and Caribbean allows them to use the ships systems to help interdict smugglers and train without Houthis tossing missiles at them.
You do realize that you can train for the high end fight with China by exercising the combat systems tracking smugglers, right?You do realize that the link in the OP proves you are bullshitting, right?
The Navy announced Friday that the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Cole had left its homeport in Florida to support US Northern Command's "border security objectives."The Trump administration has made cracking down on maritime-related criminal activity, including weapons smuggling, drug trafficking, and illegal immigration, a top priority, and the Defense Department has sent military assets to the US-Mexico border. Among these assets are five destroyers and a littoral combat ship on staggered deployments.Trump's Pentagon keeps sending destroyers that fought in the Red Sea to the US southern border — a fourth one is on its way
The Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Cole is the latest warship to go from the US Navy's counter-Houthi mission to America's backyard.www.yahoo.com
Training my ass.
If a MAGA is posting it, it's a lie.
Imagine Nelson having to come up with a secondary laugh after he's already deployed a "ha-HA!" at you.
Don't we have something called the Coast Guard? ****ing destroyers to track smugglers?You do realize that you can train for the high end fight with China by exercising the combat systems tracking smugglers, right?
I guess the pervasive lack of knowledge about the military on this board is due to the political leanings of our members.
The Coast Guard needs assistance. Kind of like the LAPD.Don't we have something called the Coast Guard? ****ing destroyers to track smugglers?
MAGA strategery, I guess.
LOL....the drug cartels have Navy ships now?The Coast Guard needs assistance. Kind of like the LAPD.
You seem to know even less that your compatriots. The SPY-1D is an excellent system to track low slow fliers and small boats. Plus two MH-60R helicopter with radar and infrared.LOL....the drug cartels have Navy ships now?
You're hilarious.
Don't we have something called the Coast Guard? ****ing destroyers to track smugglers?
MAGA strategery, I guess.
“Gulf of America”? What a ****ing joke.You do realize that US Navy assets have supported SOUTHCOM for years, right? The USS Cole has already returned from the 5th Fleet AOR. They are now starting to get trained up for their next deployment. Deploying to the Gulf of America and Caribbean allows them to use the ships systems to help interdict smugglers and train without Houthis tossing missiles at them.
You don’t even know what the body of water they are being sailed to is called, and you want to claim others lack knowledge?You do realize that you can train for the high end fight with China by exercising the combat systems tracking smugglers, right?
I guess the pervasive lack of knowledge about the military on this board is due to the political leanings of our members.
“Gulf of America”? What a ****ing joke.
1) Gulf of America is the “official term”.You don’t even know what the body of water they are being sailed to is called, and you want to claim others lack knowledge?
Yeah, and according to the US military Braxton Bragg was worthy of having a fort named after him. Declaring something doesn’t make it so1) Gulf of America is the “official term”.
2) It is called humor.
3) I noticed that you couldn’t attack the facts of the deployments.
4) Lighten up Francis.
Your non-relevant response is noted.Yeah, and according to the US military Braxton Bragg was worthy of having a fort named after him. Declaring something doesn’t make it so
If we were planning on “attacking” Mexico, why did the ships previously on station return to home port?And since the president keeps threatening to attack Mexico, the premise that they are there to practice without getting shot at doesn’t seem to hold up either.
It’s not “the Gulf of America” and never will be.Your non-relevant response is noted.
If we were planning on “attacking” Mexico, why did the ships previously on station return to home port?
And how do you attack a country with one DDG? Please be specific.
We have been embarking USCG LEDETs on USN ships for decades both in the SOUTHCOM AOR and the CENTCOM AOR.
So, you can’t answer any of my questions or back up your assertions. Sad, just sad.It’s not “the Gulf of America” and never will be.
And no amount of whining can ever change that.
Gee, the president of the United States sure sounds convinced we will be.
America’s been waging wars of aggression against countries in Latin America for well over a century.
It’s indeed rather sad you can’t bear to face up to the fact that it’s not “the Gulf of America”.So, you can’t answer any of my questions or back up your assertions. Sad, just sad.
Now, run along and let the adults talk.
We are not talking about what the Gulf is called. We are talking about USN DDG deployments.It’s indeed rather sad you can’t bear to face up to the fact that it’s not “the Gulf of America”.
You desperately tried to ignore the fact that the president keeps talking about how America is going to attack Mexico, yes, all while moving ships around in the Gulf of Mexico.We are not talking about what the Gulf is called. We are talking about USN DDG deployments.
Point #2 in post #17. And it seems to have worked.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?