- Joined
- Jul 23, 2018
- Messages
- 42,527
- Reaction score
- 28,053
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
That's why my post stands on it's own merit. The SDNY hasn't had it's shot at Trump yet in a court of law. Your statement is meaningless as it is an unfounded, unproven, blanket statement. Each case is unique. Your blanket statement is stupid and wreaks of desperation.As we have seen in gov't and in responses to gov't investigations, the gov't investigation and the immediate outcry of the beginning of the investigation have very little to do with facts.
I see you edited your post, and went the 'mind reading'/'putAs we have seen in gov't and in responses to gov't investigations, the gov't investigation and the immediate outcry of the beginning of the investigation have very little to do with facts.
Side note: But, hey, I understand your hypocrisy considering your political bent. You are sure Trump is guilty w/o any corroborating evidence of it but you aren't sure of Biden's guilt with Burisma because there isn't any corroborating evidence.
Unlike the investigation into Hillary's private email server. Congress asked for an investigation into Hillary's private email server and evidence was destroyed and, consequently, no investigation ensued.Like Benghazi.
But you don't see that your post is meaningless, pointless and political since we don't know of the conclusions nor of the progress of the SDNY investigation.That's why my post stands on it's own merit. The SDNY hasn't had it's shot at Trump yet in a court of law. Your statement is meaningless as it is an unfounded, unproven, blanket statement. Each case is unique. Your blanket statement is stupid and wreaks of desperation.
/// YOU are sure that....///. What I am sure of is you are incapable of reading OTHER's minds; yet you have no problem trying ( and failing ) to do just that. May as well accept your defeat what that nonsense begins.As we have seen in gov't and in responses to gov't investigations, the gov't investigation and the immediate outcry of the beginning of the investigation have very little to do with facts.
Side note: But, hey, I understand your hypocrisy considering your political bent. You are sure Trump is guilty w/o any corroborating evidence of it but you aren't sure of Biden's guilt with Burisma because there isn't any corroborating evidence.
You did see the word 'after' in my post above? YES? You're struggling rather significantly and failing miserably with your failed argument.But you don't see that your post is meaningless, pointless and political since we don't know of the conclusions nor of the progress of the SDNY investigation.
Why yes, I'm entitled to edit my own posts.I see you edited your post, and went the 'mind reading'/'put
Give me an example of my mind reading./// YOU are sure that....///. What I am sure of is you are incapable of reading OTHER's minds; yet you have no problem trying ( and failing ) to do just that. May as well accept your defeat what that nonsense begins.
Of course you are. Won't change the fact you lost the argument.Why yes, I'm entitled to edit my own posts.
Mind reading 'attempts'. Please do try to keep up with your own posts.Give me an example of my mind reading.
OK.Of course you are. Won't change the fact you lost the argument.
I didn't ask for a grammar lesson. I asked for you to supply an example of my mind reading attempts.Mind reading 'attempts'. Please do try to keep up with your own posts.
Only in YOUR mind, as any objective reader can clearly see your failed mind reading attempts up thread. That's on you.OK.You realize you declaring victory is your strawman?
And I addressed that question. Time to move on, as it appears you are incapable of discerning the content of your very own posts.I didn't ask for a grammar lesson. I asked for you to supply an example of my mind reading attempts.
An objective reader as you imply yourself to beOnly in YOUR mind, as any objective reader can clearly see your failed mind reading attempts up thread. That's on you.
Call it what you will. The proof is up thread in YOUR posts.An objective reader as you imply yourself to beThat's the whole point of me calling your 'victory' a strawman argument.
Do I need to be more clear? Provide one instance of my mind reading attempts.And I addressed that question. Time to move on, as it appears you are incapable of discerning the content of your very own posts.
No. Your 'crystal clear' failed attempt at reading another's poster's mind, and the failed attempt(s) to put YOUR words in ANOTHER poster's mouth are clearly on display, as stated previously. Time to move on. It will also save you further embarrassment and frustration.Do I need to be more clear? Provide one instance of my mind reading attempts.
Should be in a much better position to answer that question AFTER the SDNY gets done with Trump.
It's hilarious watching the Trumpkins claim to never listen to him, but repeat his propaganda word for word.
Define /// a pretty good success rtrump doesn’t live In New York anymore, I’m sure there’s communities in the US where people would be willing to provoke a Bundy style Standoff which had a pretty good success rate against the Obama regime
^^^ Capitalizes the word 'standoff.' Thanks for the laugh.trump doesn’t live In New York anymore, I’m sure there’s communities in the US where people would be willing to provoke a Bundy style Standoff which had a pretty good success rate against the Obama regime
Do you have proof to present that validates your positive claim /// " or they wouldn't know what he says word for word'? ///Like I said, democrats listen to him or they wouldn't know what he says word for word.
Every person should be treated equally under the law. Why is that debated in America? Why isn't it OK for someone to chant lock them up about someone that quite possibly may have broken the law but isn't being prosecuted by the law?
My question: Which law did Trump break that he deserves jail time?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?