- Joined
- Sep 4, 2021
- Messages
- 21,845
- Reaction score
- 7,516
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
There's an irony here where many of the current US Administration talk about a supposed lack of free speech here in Europe (and they especially claim in the UK) but we saw last night where Trump threw out a potential threat to media that opposes him.
"US President Donald Trump has suggested some TV networks should have their licences "taken away",
as he backed America's broadcast watchdog in a row over the suspension of late-night TV host Jimmy Kimmel."
![]()
Trump says TV networks 'against' him should 'maybe' lose licence after Kimmel suspension
Concerns grow that the Trump administration is curtailing criticism after ABC host Jimmy Kimmel's show was cancelled.www.bbc.com
There's an extended audio feature here if you have a BBC account discussing the reasons for this growing Trump-led obsession with UK free speech "when a crackdown on speech is kicking off at home"
Curious, what do our European readers make of this?
Irony noted, but I am afraid irony or not, hypocrisy or not, the challenge still stands. An argument or case is not invalidated because the petitioner is a hypocrite. It just means both accuser and accused are guilty.
That said, I will say there's a far bigger push in Europe and Eu- under the guise of combating that vague, poorly defined but convenient "misinformation"- to use state and Eu institutions to control information disseminated to the public.
The case of the Telegram CEO comes to mind