Watching Bernists who thank my posts hammering Trump for undermining our elections and institutions turn around and cry that the vote was "rigged" is amazing.
This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
HRC cheated. From methods ranging from DWS pulling strings to outright election fraud.
You are being silly, but I appreciate your effort, my friend.Lmao, argue a negative.... Instead of proving a positive...which is what you've failed to do. In short your argument relies on a fantasy that can't be argued through anything than your wishes of what would have happened. Bernie didn't beat Hillary and any claims about what would have happened if he had are bull**** because neither of us has a crystal ball. We do know what happened:
- Hillary beat Bernie
- Trump beat Hillary
- Independents voted for Trump - whose policies were the exact opposites of what Bernie and Hillary argued for.
Conclusion:
Anything else is just you projecting on what ifs. Please learn the basics of argument construction? This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
That argument would get the maker jailed for contempt by the judge.Lmao, so doubling down on the fraud accusations. Whose vote was changed during the election? This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
You are being silly, but I appreciate your effort, my friend.
That argument would get the maker jailed for contempt by the judge.
If you shot at me and missed, then you argued "no harm no foul", the judge would jail you immediately for wasting her time.
Lmao, so doubling down on the fraud accusations. Whose vote was changed during the election?
This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
Are you OK, because that made no sense. You are pretending that votes had to be changed for their to be actionable proof against Trump and his buddies. No, all they had to do was conspire to attempt to do it, and the intel agencies are making it quite clear that it was done.Lmao, actually the argument he's making is that if I shoot you, and miss - it's murder. Not that he's proven any fraud in any direction anyways. This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
Lol lotsI accept your surrender. This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
Well, the primary was always skewed towards Hillary. They put the Southern states first, on purpose, to give Hillary a huge delegate lead before Bernie's message could get out there. You even have DWS admitting on camera, after the election, that the DNC "did work to prepare for Hillary to be our nominee" But, I first started noticing something funny with the voter suppression in the Arizona primary. It wasn't that out in the open and brazen until they stripped 125,000 voters from the rolls in Brooklyn. And trained poll workers in California to give NPP/Independent voters provisional ballots, which don't count. I already made a giant post one time summarizing the complex timeline and important events that show how Bernie was cheated out of the nomination. But, it's all in the past now.
I don't feel like spending an afternoon pouring through all the links and figuring out what is credible and what is bull****. But, just look at how 125,000 voters were stripped from the rolls in Brooklyn. A win in New York, would have changed the election. If you recall, after Super Tuesday 2, Bernie had went on a winning streak, he won like 7 primaries in a row, leading up to New York. Clinton desperately needed New York to put Bernie to bed, and Bernie desperately needed it to make up some delegates. So, they fixed it for her, like they fixed the whole thing for her.
Tl/dr.
You're engaging in Trumpette tactics. Claim fraud and faulty institutions but never prove anything. I'm still waiting on people being bused into NH - a claim made by Trumpettes. I guess it'll take you longer to find pictures of Hillary sorting through boxes and burning Bernie votes.
This was sent from Putin's computer using Donald's credentials.
Here - explain to me why people who voted for Trump would have voted for Bernie given that they stand on opposite ends on the overwhelming majority of their politics?
Populism and anti-corruption messages? Good grief, you do realize that most Trump voters knew he was sleazy and just didn't care, don't you?
The liberal delusion continues. We lost because the numbers weren't there - and they have been declining for 12 years. 3 popular votes won while losing all 3 branches of government. Wake up folks, it's not the candidates, it's the geography of our votes.
Lmao, argue a negative.... Instead of proving a positive...which is what you've failed to do.
In short your argument relies on a fantasy that can't be argued through anything than your wishes of what would have happened. Bernie didn't beat Hillary and any claims about what would have happened if he had are bull**** because neither of us has a crystal ball.
We do know what happened:
- Hillary beat Bernie
- Trump beat Hillary
- Independents voted for Trump - whose policies were the exact opposites of what Bernie and Hillary argued for.
Conclusion:
Anything else is just you projecting on what ifs. Please learn the basics of argument construction?
Well, the primary was always skewed towards Hillary. They put the Southern states first, on purpose, to give Hillary a huge delegate lead before Bernie's message could get out there. You even have DWS admitting on camera, after the election, that the DNC "did work to prepare for Hillary to be our nominee" But, I first started noticing something funny with the voter suppression in the Arizona primary. It wasn't that out in the open and brazen until they stripped 125,000 voters from the rolls in Brooklyn. And trained poll workers in California to give NPP/Independent voters provisional ballots, which don't count. I already made a giant post one time summarizing the complex timeline and important events that show how Bernie was cheated out of the nomination. But, it's all in the past now.
I don't feel like spending an afternoon pouring through all the links and figuring out what is credible and what is bull****. But, just look at how 125,000 voters were stripped from the rolls in Brooklyn. A win in New York, would have changed the election. If you recall, after Super Tuesday 2, Bernie had went on a winning streak, he won like 7 primaries in a row, leading up to New York. Clinton desperately needed New York to put Bernie to bed, and Bernie desperately needed it to make up some delegates. So, they fixed it for her, like they fixed the whole thing for her.
In other words you are spouting partisan drivel that you can not support. I am shocked...One day you will figure it out all by yourself . :lol:
In other words you are spouting partisan drivel that you can not support. I am shocked...
This is why its hard to discuss things, immunity to facts.
The powers and limits of Robert Mueller's new job as special counsel - CBS News
Even CBS recognizes there are limits to the statute that gives Mueller powers to investigate and limits him. Why don't you?
That isn't what the link shows. It states specifically the power to investigate anything that comes about while investigating the original focus.
Q. Could a special counsel investigate things beyond simply the Russia connection?
A. Mueller has a broad mandate to determine the course of an investigation, but not an unlimited one. If he decides that something outside the scope of the letter appointing him needs investigating, he would have to ask for permission to expand his probe.
Horse****.
Yep. And the scope is the Russia investigation, and anything else that pops up during said investigation.
Which is why he is going into finances. Think he will find evidence of improper deductions, or some other financial infraction somewhere?
Which are outside of the scope of what he is investigating...because you don't seem to understand what focus means.
What does a deduction have to do with the election? Could you be more partisan?
Read your own link. Mueller has the authority to investigate anything that arises out of the Russia investigation.
I did, you don't understand the legal definition of scope. Just because you want a witch hunt doesn't mean scope is anything they go fishing for.
Well, the primary was always skewed towards Hillary. They put the Southern states first, on purpose, to give Hillary a huge delegate lead before Bernie's message could get out there. You even have DWS admitting on camera, after the election, that the DNC "did work to prepare for Hillary to be our nominee" But, I first started noticing something funny with the voter suppression in the Arizona primary. It wasn't that out in the open and brazen until they stripped 125,000 voters from the rolls in Brooklyn. And trained poll workers in California to give NPP/Independent voters provisional ballots, which don't count. I already made a giant post one time summarizing the complex timeline and important events that show how Bernie was cheated out of the nomination. But, it's all in the past now.
I don't feel like spending an afternoon pouring through all the links and figuring out what is credible and what is bull****. But, just look at how 125,000 voters were stripped from the rolls in Brooklyn. A win in New York, would have changed the election. If you recall, after Super Tuesday 2, Bernie had went on a winning streak, he won like 7 primaries in a row, leading up to New York. Clinton desperately needed New York to put Bernie to bed, and Bernie desperately needed it to make up some delegates. So, they fixed it for her, like they fixed the whole thing for her.
The scope is Russia, and anything that arises from it.
In other words, limitless.
Which is why Trump is po'ed. Mueller will find something. Whether it has anything to do with Russia or not.
Read your own link. Mueller has the authority to investigate anything that arises out of the Russia investigation.
Q. Could a special counsel investigate things beyond simply the Russia connection?
A. Mueller has a broad mandate to determine the course of an investigation, but not an unlimited one. If he decides that something outside the scope of the letter appointing him needs investigating, he would have to ask for permission to expand his probe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?