Trump takes a dig at Tim Walz days after (and while) Walz deals with Democrats being hunted/assassinated by a far right conservative

[Michael Cole]

So the "No Kings" signs and other anti-Trump activities suggests he was MAGA?????????

No. Being a Trump voting pro-life conservative Christian Republican who was appointed by a Republican governor makes him MAGA. As well as having a hit list containing only Democrats.

Looks like you need to catch up with the news. Or reality.

 

[bongsaway]

I don't really care. He shot them. And he was a Tampon Tim appointee as well as a Trump hater. If you are curious about why he shot him, ask him.

Yeah, he was a republican and walz's mistake was trying to be bi partisan with the appointment. That was a mistake, he also supported trump and voted for him.

Look before you leap and end up with foot in mouth disease.

 

[bongsaway]

Incoherent post.

Say no more, we understand.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Why would anyone expect Trump to do anything other than insult Walz?

It's what he does.

Tim Walz reminds MAGA of the men they were supposed to be (good father, has a loving family, attends church, helps people in need, respects his wife, protects his youngish kids from MAGA, talks in a caring adult manner, is in favor or things that help the poor, etc).

So they have to attack him for anything so they can protect the adulterous crook and felon who stole from a cancer charity.

Tim forces them to use a mirror. So they break the mirror (by attacking Tim).

 

[dockside]

No. Being a Trump voting pro-life conservative Christian Republican who was appointed by a Republican governor makes him MAGA. As well as having a hit list containing only Democrats.

Looks like you need to catch up with the news. Or reality.

He was first appointed by Mark Dayton, a Democratic governor and his position, when it expired, was re-appointed by Walz. It happens, especially with Democratic politicians, to appoint people from the opposing party to insignificant boards, to appear to support non-partisan positions.

Of course, the MAGAs have no idea that it is possible to be non-partisan in some cases.

 

[Michael Cole]

He was first appointed by Mark Dayton, a Democratic governor and his position, when it expired, was re-appointed by Walz. It happens, especially with Democratic politicians, to appoint people from the opposing party to insignificant boards, to appear to support non-partisan positions.

Of course, the MAGAs have no idea that it is possible to be non-partisan in some cases.

Thanks. I thought the original appointment was by a Republican governor.