- Joined
- Jul 19, 2023
- Messages
- 6,253
- Reaction score
- 2,047
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Why would I be upset? Can you please explain that to me?Tsk... you're so upset. There there.
That said, I fully agree with your last paragraph.
Why would I be upset? Can you please explain that to me?
Canucks seem to have an inferiority complex.
So you "know" that I am upset but you have no idea why? You can only speculate. Wow, Liberals say the darnedest things.I'm not sure why you're upset.
How have I represented myself here? Do tell.And based on how you've represented yourself here, the last thing I'm worried about is an inferiority complex.Quite the opposite, honestly... some folks make it hard to be humble.
I know how presidential elections work and I know Trump won in a landslide. That's all I need to know.
"Majority percentage" has nothing to do with winning or losing a presidential election. Or didn't you know that?
Ignorant sounding and bad at math.Why would I be upset? Can you please explain that to me?
Canucks seem to have an inferiority complex.
Popular vote has nothing to do with determining a presidential election winner. I would suggest you brush up on the rules of a presidential election.He didnβt win by a landslide.
By traditional numeric measures, Trumpβs victory was neither unprecedented nor a landslide. he actually won with one of the smallest margins of victory in the popular vote since the 19th century.
You can lie to yourself as much as you want. It still doesnβt make it true.
Landslides are unmistakable, Lyndon B. Johnsonβs in 1964 by 22.6 points, Nixonβs in 1972 by 23.2 points and Reaganβs in 1984 by 18.2 points. In the 40 years since that Reagan victory, no president has won the popular vote by double digits.That makes no sense. Well it is nonsense, so if you want to count that. Nope, you got nothing. You're just flailing in the wind now.
You don't know math!! By traditional numeric measures he didnβt win by a landslide!!
View attachment 67547594
There you go again with the popular vote nonsense.Landslides are unmistakable, Lyndon B. Johnsonβs in 1964 by 22.6 points, Nixonβs in 1972 by 23.2 points and Reaganβs in 1984 by 18.2 points. In the 40 years since that Reagan victory, no president has won the popular vote by double digits.
Trumpβs 1.6-point victory is smaller than that of every winning president since 1888 other than Kennedy in 1960 and Nixon in 1968. In addition, two presidents won the Electoral College while losing the popular vote: the second Mr. Bush in 2000 and Trump in 2016.
Trump didnβt win a landslide no matter how much Trump repeats it
So you "know" that I am upset but you have no idea why? You can only speculate. Wow, Liberals say the darnedest things.
How have I represented myself here? Do tell.
You throw out these whopper bombs but you never seem to want to back them up. You are more interested in insulting someone than having an actual discussion. It reeks of insecurity and a lack of knowledge.
Don't worry, Trump's bark is bigger than his bite. He won't crash your economy.
He also attracts the worst trolls to him.The troll likes to hear himself talk.
You seem to be fetishizing that picture. Kind of weird how you keep posting versions of it over and over.
La Trump? Why are you shouting your ignorance?Popular vote has nothing to do with determining a presidential election winner. I would suggest you brush up on the rules of a presidential election.
Viva la Trump baby!
Well, you're a little fired up! Relax, take a deep breath. It's gonna be OK. Big bad Trump is not going to make Canada our 51st state. He was just joking, I promise.What's there to talk about? You're here to troll. I'm OK with that, I can beat you there too, with the same facts that I could use to beat you in a more serious debate.
1) Trump's threat before request tactics are common thuggery.
2) We can't hurt each other without hurting ourselves, so trade wars and punitive tariffs are stupid, and would only be taken on by Canada if that dumb ass Donald Trump gives us no other option.
3) Only a worthless piece of shit would continue to insult their greatest allies and trade partners, and only worthless pieces of shit would applaud him for it.
4) The same worthless pieces of shit that applaud him for it are currently cheering for a guy that's walking back his promises before even taking a stab at them, making them gullible pieces of shit that look more ridiculous the more they troll.
5) The wildly inflated accusations against Canada are more food for ridiculous, gullible pieces of shit, rather than anything supported by statistics.
6) Despite that, Canada would have, and likely still will, work with Trump on these issues, not because we are weak, not because he's some stable genius who excels at diplomacy and leadership, but because doing so is in our best interests as well, making this entire stupid troll fest, and the resulting blow to the perception of intelligence to be found among the previously mentioned ridiculous, gullible pieces of shit, entirely unnecessary.
So. What would you like to talk about?
It triggers you doesn't it? I knew it would.You seem to be fetishizing that picture. Kind of weird how you keep posting versions of it over and over.
Canucks are so cute. I just want to pick one up and give it a big hug. I want to take it home to my wife and ask her if we can keep it.La Trump? Why are you shouting your ignorance?
La vaca- the cow
El toro- the bull
Or are you calling for a long life for Melania?
Magas are so ignorant. You want to explain simple things to them and they go back to their ignorance like a shit-eating dog.Canucks are so cute. I just want to pick one up and give it a big hug. I want to take it home to my wife and ask her if we can keep it.
What percentage of MAGA's do you believe are ignorant?Magas are so ignorant. You want to explain simple things to them and they go back to their ignorance like a shit-eating dog.
It's hopeless to try but the result can be entertaining.
I think he means this:La Trump? Why are you shouting your ignorance?
La vaca- the cow
El toro- the bull
Or are you calling for a long life for Melania?
There seems to be some minimal Canadian interest, especially in Alberta.The practical implications of Canadia being a US state are quite good. The place is liberal and with a high population.
Obviously there is minimal Canadian interest.There seems to be some minimal Canadian interest, especially in Alberta.
View attachment 67547629
How Canadians Feel About Becoming '51st US State', Joe Edwards, Newsweek, 12/18/2024
And now we have an approximation to measure it.Obviously there is minimal Canadian interest.
What I find most interesting is that Albertans, who culturally are a lot closer to Texas than mainstream Canada, would have the most to gain from such an arrangement.And now we have an approximation to measure it.
That is very true. I hadn't thought about it till you brought it up. But yeah, starting with the Canadian Pro Rodeo Association. More than a few participate in our rodeos.What I find most interesting is that Albertans, who culturally are a lot closer to Texas than mainstream Canada, would have the most to gain from such an arrangement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?