• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump stokes the violence on Jan. 6th, now blames Pelosi for it...

and yet like I said there are MILLIONS and Millions of Americans following him and believe every word he says
and THAT should WORRY the rest of us
Have a nice day
 
i'm not totally convinced that the people that still support him have no integrity in their own lives and would support another insurrection attempt.
 
The former guy is doing what he does best and blaming someone else for his shortcomings. Typical.

He KNOWS all he had to do was pick up the ****en phone. As it turned out, Pence did it.

We agree about a lot, and yes, all he had to do was pick up the phone and it would have been resolved earlier. There are several witnessess who have said publicly that he watched TV and loved it. but ya know, the part about Pence, those were the reports shortly after the event, but this is an article that clarifies that,

"Alternative reports asserted that Miller had spoken with Vice President Mike Pence about the decision. But that would have been more of a courtesy to keep the White House informed, the source familiar told Military Times, not a request for permission."


In case there are any trumpnuts reading this, or in case trump himself wants to know what happened, the article above doesn't name Nancy at all.

"So when chaos unfolded Wednesday afternoon and reports surfaced that there had been a request for additional Guard troops and the Defense Department had denied it, here’s what really happened.

Because of D.C.’s finicky federal status, any entity ― whether its the mayor, or the Interior Department, which controls federal parks within the District ― has to put in a request for National Guard troops through the Army secretary, who gets it endorsed by the defense secretary.

The Capitol’s request for Guard back-up went beyond what Bowser had already gotten approved, so it needed a new sign-off.

“We quickly worked to move our resources forward in support of Metro PD and the Capitol Police,” McCarthy said Thursday.


The process took about an hour, the source familiar told Military Times, from the time McCarthy received it around 2 p.m. on Wednesday.

“We wanted to make sure, based off what we saw developing, that that was an acceptable use, all the way up to the SECDEF, which didn’t take long,” the source said, including about half an hour spent relaying the request to acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller."
 
If the current 1/6 committee were actually conducting a real investigation, questions to Pelosi would indeed be a big part of it as would questions to the FBI. But no, that committee is nothing but a partisan joke.
what are you babbling about now?
 

Which is crazy because they're saying the paperwork prevented the NG from arriving, and it took half an hour to get the message to Chris Miller???? were they using smoke signals ?!?! Semafore flags ? carrier pigeons? Good thing the chinese didn't launch, the pidgeoens never would have gotten through in time.
 
If the current 1/6 committee were actually conducting a real investigation, questions to Pelosi would indeed be a big part of it as would questions to the FBI. But no, that committee is nothing but a partisan joke.
Mitch and Nancy signed off on the same paper concerning the security of the Capitol during the time the EC convened. If you blame Nancy, why would you not blame McConnell?
Also, this article clarifies the situation well, you might notice, Nancy is not mentioned in the article at all,

 
i'm not totally convinced that the people that still support him have no integrity in their own lives and would support another insurrection attempt.
Your double negative confused me a bit. I assume you are not convinced they do have integrity, and that they wouldn't support another event like 1/6?

Frankly, it's hard to believe how anyone can have integrity and still openly support Trump.
 
Your double negative confused me a bit. I assume you are not convinced they do have integrity, and that they wouldn't support another event like 1/6?

Frankly, it's hard to believe how anyone can have integrity and still openly support Trump.
typo

not was supposed to be now
 
dOnald j. tRump. A skidmark in the underwear of Democracy.
 
 
If the current 1/6 committee were actually conducting a real investigation, questions to Pelosi would indeed be a big part of it as would questions to the FBI. But no, that committee is nothing but a partisan joke.
Yeah, sedition apologists would agree.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…