• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Should Be Removed from Office

RAMOSS

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
62,963
Reaction score
27,371
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
And, in mixing Religion and Politics, the magazine Christianity Today ( founded by Billy Graham) said that Trump should be removed.

Trump Should Be Removed from Office | Christianity Today

It starts off with


And further down, it comments

 
So are the next four weeks just going to be a continuous regressive circle-jerk?
Because if so, I'll just wait to come back after the man wins reelection.
 
So are the next four weeks just going to be a continuous regressive circle-jerk?
Because if so, I'll just wait to come back after the man wins reelection.

Oh please don't tease us, just leave. :lamo
 
So are the next four weeks just going to be a continuous regressive circle-jerk?
Because if so, I'll just wait to come back after the man wins reelection.

The question is why you commented at all. Seems to me the article made a series of good points. You should read it and comment on it if you disagree. Otherwise, no one will miss you on this thread.


I can't find anything to dispute there, can you?
 
So are the next four weeks just going to be a continuous regressive circle-jerk?
Because if so, I'll just wait to come back after the man wins reelection.

Better bring a winter coat, Hell gets very cold when it freezes over.
 
Are the lib Trump haters going to suddenly get religion?

You're so funny, you people always think that 65% of this country that hates Trump don't have any religion, you couldn't be more wrong. It's shear ignorance to believe that, nothing more.
 
I would not bet the farm on that

That is your opinion. No one thought he was going to win election last time, and this time around he's had no real competition from the democrats as is.

This impeachment show was nothing but that, a show.
 
Oh please don't tease us, just leave. :lamo

I'd be free from the idiocy and lies that keep getting spewed by your side, you know that right?

Not to mention being free from watching you lot repeatedly stroke one another.
 


You do realize that none of this claim was actually proven right?
 
Better bring a winter coat, Hell gets very cold when it freezes over.

Speaking from experience I see. Then again, I'm not the one forgetting what happened in 2016.

The man has no real opponent in this election and the democrats are too busy jacking each other off over this impeachment circus. To even realize that they've spent the last few months burning their own house down, and they haven't even completely forced Trump out yet.
 
I'd be free from the idiocy and lies that keep getting spewed by your side, you know that right?

Not to mention being free from watching you lot repeatedly stroke one another.

Great so go chase the dream and LEAVE! Run, don’t walk to that door. Hurry!
 
Great so go chase the dream and LEAVE! Run, don’t walk to that door. Hurry!

More like I just close the browser window. But nice try at being somewhat close to the conversation at least.

Though you also might want to work at making your diatribes not so limp wristed in the future. It helps others take you more seriously.
 
For some value of "proven" you are right.

Given what was revealed in the transcript and even spoken about during testimony. None of what was stated there is actually true.

No one even came close to it during the impeachment hearings, and even when it was brought up. It was with no 1st hand knowledge of the topic, or it was only assumed to be what was going on.
 
I'd be free from the idiocy and lies that keep getting spewed by your side, you know that right?

Not to mention being free from watching you lot repeatedly stroke one another.

Sounds a bit like 'stroke-envy' to me.
 
More like I just close the browser window. But nice try at being somewhat close to the conversation at least.

Though you also might want to work at making your diatribes not so limp wristed in the future. It helps others take you more seriously.

Limp wristed is your threatening to leave and then don’t. :lamo
 
So you say.
 
You do realize that none of this claim was actually proven right?

Was proven beyond all reasonable doubt to me. The "perfect" phone call was enough to convince me, and that's before everyone on the ground in Ukraine testified to the attempt "to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents." Rudy, his personal attorney, said he was proud of his efforts to coerce Ukraine to do just that, admitted last week he got Yovanovitch ousted to facilitate it.

And that was just part of the argument made in that article.


To the bolded - no. That's been a surprise actually, how thoroughly and enthusiastically the evangelicals in politics have bear hugged a serial liar, womanizer and adulterer, life long con man, and a man without any discernible principles except his own malignant narcissism. I get reluctantly supporting him versus a godless Democrat!!, but that's not what happened - they've EMBRACED the man.

 
For some value of "proven" you are right.

No, he's not. There is no question Trump attempted to "coerce" Ukraine into investigating Biden. The phone call shows it - 6 or 8 times he said he wanted Z to work with Rudy and/or Barr on those investigations. When the President asks for a "favor," it's to "coerce" the country whose very existence might depend on that support into granting it. The dispute is whether the QPQ was "proven." It doesn't need to be to prove that the attempt to coerce was obvious, blatant, and confirmed by any number of witnesses, including Trump, Mulvaney, and Rudy, not to mention Sondland, Taylor, et al.
 

If you're going to present some sort of metaphors here, you may want to remember what a 'house of cards' is. That's precisely what Trump's entire administration has been constructed upon. A house with a foundation that's vulnerable. From his firing of James Comey, to his Oval Office meeting with the two Russian top spies to his abandoning the Kurds and his attempt to manipulate a foreign country that's in dire need of military aid, it's all been a series of events that would sooner or later uncover his sinister motivations which are nothing more elaborate than common greed, thirst for power and allegiance to the one master he serves, which is Vladimir Putin. His impeachment is only the first defeat of the republican party, it will not be their last.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…