- Joined
- Apr 18, 2013
- Messages
- 110,582
- Reaction score
- 100,804
- Location
- Barsoom
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
8.14.25
A report that President Donald Trump is preparing to offer Russian President Vladimir Putin economic incentives to encourage him to end the war in Ukraine—including opening up access to natural resources off Alaska's coast—has sparked anger online. The Daily Telegraph reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is exploring the economic trade-offs the U.S. can make with Russia in order to facilitate a ceasefire and peace agreement. These include giving Putin access to the rare earth minerals in the Ukrainian territories Moscow partially occupies, as well as opportunities to tap into the natural resources in the Bering Strait between Alaska and Russia's eastern coast. The Telegraph cited a White House statement that it did not comment "on deliberative conversations that may or may not be happening."
But social media users have responded with anger at the prospect of opening up Alaska's natural resources to Russian interests, including Trump critic and former GOP representative Adam Kinzinger who posted on X: "Let's see republicans defend this." Trump's America First policy has seen him strike mineral deals with Ukraine and Kazakhstan. While the Telegraph report has not been verified and there are few details, the prospect of opening up resources near Alaska to Putin would bolster Russia's strategic interests in the Arctic region. The Telegraph report said he would present Putin with commercial opportunities in occupied Ukrainian territory as well as the Bering Straits, and that Bessent was exploring the economic trade-offs the U.S. could make with Russia—such as lifting American sanctions on Russia's aviation industry—to expedite a peace deal. Thousands of people are expected to gather in Anchorage on Thursday to protest against the arrival of Putin ahead of Friday's summit. Trump told a press conference Wednesday that following the bilateral meeting, there was a chance of a second meeting with Putin that would include Zelensky.
I hope he goes ahead with that offer, I really do, the Republicans will lose Alaska if he does.
It will be interesting to see which one of us is right on that one. Too bad it's too far off.No, they won't.
Surely you’re aware that the Executive Branch decides on the extraction of the nation’s natural resources and makes trade agreements.I wasn't aware that Donald Trump owned America's resources.
Paradoxically, yes.After all, Barack Obama has one.
Surely you’re aware that the Executive Branch decides on the extraction of the nation’s natural resources and makes trade agreements.
Well yeah. Who the hell would incur the expense of extracting and processing our natural resources for nothing?…exploit our natural resources for profit.
Of course you would be fine with it since it is Trump doing itSurely you’re aware that the Executive Branch decides on the extraction of the nation’s natural resources and makes trade agreements.
Paradoxically, yes.
Of course you would be fine with it since it is Trump doing it
The idea that the president of the United States doesn’t control what America does or doesn’t do with its natural resources seems like a stretch at best.Trump reportedly offering Putin natural resources off Alaska sparks fury
"Lets see Republicans defend this," former GOP Representative Adam Kinzinger wrote on X.www.newsweek.com
I wasn't aware that Donald Trump owned America's resources. Supplying Russia with rare Earth minerals is not very sound national security policy.
There is no telling how far down the rabbit hole Trump may go in order to acquire a Nobel Peace Prize. After all, Barack Obama has one.
Surely you’re aware that the Executive Branch decides on the extraction of the nation’s natural resources and makes trade agreements.
No one is “giving away” anything.His name is not Shirley.
And the Executive Branch can't just give away American resources to an enemy nation.
Then what is the deal? How can Trump force companies to sell raw materials to Putin? Opening up sales to Russia doesn't mean the sales will occur. Unless you're suggesting Trump mandate who the extractors can and can't sell their products to.No one is “giving away” anything.
McMaster could tell you how far down after Helsinki.Trump reportedly offering Putin natural resources off Alaska sparks fury
"Lets see Republicans defend this," former GOP Representative Adam Kinzinger wrote on X.www.newsweek.com
I wasn't aware that Donald Trump owned America's resources. Supplying Russia with rare Earth minerals is not very sound national security policy.
There is no telling how far down the rabbit hole Trump may go in order to acquire a Nobel Peace Prize. After all, Barack Obama has one.
The U.S. engaged in trade with the Soviet Union throughout much of the Cold War, so clearly it can.His name is not Shirley.
And the Executive Branch can't just give away American resources to an enemy nation.
The U.S. engaged in trade with the Soviet Union throughout much of the Cold War, so clearly it can.
Some minerals is hardly “everything”.Back then, we were getting something in return.
Trump is giving Putzin everything & America & Ukraine get nothing.
Some minerals is hardly “everything”.
Peace deals usually require giving up something you want in order to get the other side to agree.It is when we need those minerals.
Peace deals usually require giving up something you want in order to get the other side to agree.
Minerals are not a particularly high price to pay for a peace deal.Great. Another one who thinks it's okay to give Putzin vital minerals from American soil.
Peace deals usually require giving up something you want in order to get the other side to agree.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?