...Trump unilaterally declares that using an amendment is unconstitutional...
Trump quotes Alan Dershowitz saying consideration of 25th Amendment ‘despicable’
What Trump said was that using the 25th was that it is unconstitutional powergrabing. What is most interesting is that both Trump and Dershowitz make serious mistakes in their arguments. Dershowitz invents an interpretation of the 25th accepted by absolutely no one else and Trump unilaterally declares that using an amendment is unconstitutional.
Horrifying. ...
Yeah, that's ****ing insane and Dershowitz is inventing reasons why an amendment shouldn't be used that don't exist. Projection is a horrible thing when what you wish happened to others is actually happening to you. We are seeing an American president claim that using an amendment on them is unconstitutional because he believes it will circumvent an election. Elections don't grant protection from amendments, guys.
Well, that would happen anyways - I really want to see where all of these people go when he is no longer in power. Do they think liberals won't be able to require their defenses of the crazy things they've defended?Oh...my...god...
What is worse is that people will defend him for saying it...
Trump quotes Alan Dershowitz saying consideration of 25th Amendment ‘despicable’
What Trump said was that using the 25th was that it is.... "unconstitutional powergrabbing"... if he gets to invent the reason.
Investigating a sitting goresident for crimes has happened under practically every administration. I would concede that if every president before Trump has come out as innocent, it's because they are or were pardonned before the investigations got too close...you know, like Nixon. Others I would still have reservations about and believe they are probably guilty, just unproven.
What is more interesting is that both Trump and Dershowitz make serious mistakes in their arguments. Dershowitz invents an interpretation of the 25th accepted by absolutely no one else and Trump unilaterally declares that using an amendment is unconstitutional.
Horrifying.
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
Well, that would happen anyways - I really want to see where all of these people go when he is no longer in power. Do they think liberals won't be able to require their defenses of the crazy things they've defended?
2020 gon be lit.
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
Trying to use the 25th Amendment to try and circumvent the election...
is a despicable act of unconstitutional power grabbing...
which happens in Third World countries...
I fail to see how the 25th amendment can be justified to remove President Trump. It doesn't make any sense.
Trump quotes Alan Dershowitz saying consideration of 25th Amendment ‘despicable’
What Trump said was that using the 25th was that it is.... "unconstitutional powergrabbing"... if he gets to invent the reason.
Investigating a sitting goresident for crimes has happened under practically every administration. I would concede that if every president before Trump has come out as innocent, it's because they are or were pardonned before the investigations got too close...you know, like Nixon. Others I would still have reservations about and believe they are probably guilty, just unproven.
What is more interesting is that both Trump and Dershowitz make serious mistakes in their arguments. Dershowitz invents an interpretation of the 25th accepted by absolutely no one else and Trump unilaterally declares that using an amendment is unconstitutional.
Horrifying.
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
Is using a constitutional amendment unconstitutional, Bucky, my boy?You know, some people actually care about the Constitution and respecting Democracy. Not some power grab. This is America for goodness sakes. Not Venezuela.
We know Bucky, stay on the bleachers. Nobody is asking you to join the debate team.I fail to see how the 25th amendment can be justified to remove President Trump. It doesn't make any sense.
I fail to see how the 25th amendment can be justified to remove President Trump. It doesn't make any sense.
Is using a constitutional amendment unconstitutional, Bucky, my boy?
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
And you're saying you can read minds? Lol, does the president get to determine whether there is just cause to use the 25th amendment? Double down on those ridiculous reasoning powers of yours.I would argue it is, if you're trying to misuse it for a purpose in which it wasn't intended.
Yeah, that's ****ing insane and Dershowitz is inventing reasons why an amendment shouldn't be used that don't exist. Projection is a horrible thing when what you wish happened to others is actually happening to you. We are seeing an American president claim that using an amendment on them is unconstitutional because he believes it will circumvent an election. Elections don't grant protection from amendments, guys.
Time to wake up guys.
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
The language is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." A president compromised by a hostile foreign power would certainly fall into that bucket.
I just laughed at how quickly they all showed up to claim that the president couldn't be removed to circumvent an election - completely ignoring that the only person who has most to gain from stating that it would be done for this reason is the person under investigation.Yes it seems they are claiming that a candidate can break any laws he wants as long as he wins. How insane is that? The President is our servant and he serves at our pleasure. The Constitution provides many ways to remove a President for good reason. A criminal in that office can do immeasurable damage to the country. Personally I think Trumps's rambling mostly incoherent speech on Friday is a reason enough to consider him a candidate for the 25th amendment. I don't think I am alone in that thought either.
And you're saying you can read minds? Lol, does the president get to determine whether there is just cause to use the 25th amendment? Double down on those ridiculous reasoning powers of yours.
Come on, we know the silly conclusion you want to reach: Trump gets to determine the constitutionality of investigations and any punishment placed on him.
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
Given the amount of things that have been leveled at Trump for the last three years. It would be very understandable to, believe, that this action isn't exactly legitimate.
Then again, someone would actually have to address that first. Instead of running from the question.
Again: Who gets to determine the constitutionality when measures in an amendment are applied? Is it the executive?
Go for it. Take your best shot. Use those silly powers of reasoning. Let everyone know exactly what your ideology has been leading to.
There aren't enough acrobatic movements in the world for anyone to claim the executive gets to mind read and determine the constitutionality of an amendment's application.
You know this, but you're stalling.
Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?