Can we start with Melania?In considering government tyranny, I recognized the possible use of removal of citizenship, and that it's essentially been held 'beyond the options' for governmental abuse - but could be perhaps. trump is now seemingly the first time in history attempting to weaponize removal of citizenship for politics - as we saw in his tyrannical threat to remove citizenship from political opponents. Some info from the ACLU:
Let's keep her and deport his children.Can we start with Melania?
Name a few.He IS however pushing to relax the protocols for denaturalization. I hope he succeeds - there are some very bad (naturalized) people in our country, and America would be much better off without them.
Trumps ICE has deported natural citizens, people born in the US.Revoking citizenship for naturalized citizens has been going on for decades - - Trump is not proposing anything new.
He IS however pushing to relax the protocols for denaturalization. I hope he succeeds - there are some very bad (naturalized) people in our country, and America would be much better off without them.
Presumably, they would be sent back to their country of origin.
The topic of the thread is Trump's push to denaturalize citizens. ICE deporting naturalized citizens is not relevant.Trumps ICE has deported natural citizens, people born in the US.
Where is the line? Has it been drawn, or is it just flexible?
"The Trump Administration has launched a denaturalization operation"
. . . In previous years, denaturalizations were pursued in small numbers, averaging 11 per year from 1990 to 2017. Under the Trump administration, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has already referred 95 cases for denaturalization to the Department of Justice (DOJ) since January 2017.
Still waiting @SkyChief
Still waiting @SkyChiefGood lord do you REALLY think that the vapid challenge of me to name the people who should be denaturalized has any merit?
Of course that information has not been made public, and there is no possible way that I could get access to that information. He knows that, and YOU know that.
So is the clown emoji next to my name supposed to be you or me?
You claim there are "very bad (naturalized) people in our country" yet you can't name even one of them because that information is not public?Good lord do you REALLY think that the vapid challenge of me to name the people who should be denaturalized has any merit?
Of course that information has not been made public, and there is no possible way that I could get access to that information. He knows that, and YOU know that.
So is the clown emoji next to my name supposed to be you or me?
You claim there are "very bad (naturalized) people in our country" yet you can't name even one of them because that information is not public?
Correct.You claim there are "very bad (naturalized) people in our country" yet you can't name even one of them because that information is not public?
Because many bad people in the past have been denaturalized by the Justice Department for lying on their citizenship applications.Then how do you know? How can you be so sure?
You're just believing bullshit. Be smarter.Youi can't. You're just believing bullshit. Be smarter.
If you can't substantiate your claim, it becomes invalid. Just because Trump wants to change laws for a political win does not mean it's the right thing to do.Good lord do you REALLY think that the vapid challenge of me to name the people who should be denaturalized has any merit?
Of course that information has not been made public, and there is no possible way that I could get access to that information. He knows that, and YOU know that.
So is the clown emoji next to my name supposed to be you or me?
You are free to ignore the truth.If you can't substantiate your claim, it becomes invalid.
FALSE.Just because Trump wants to change laws for a political win does not mean it's the right thing to do.
1.) Trump is a known liar, so you shouldn't believe a word he says .You are free to ignore the truth.
FALSE.
Denaturalization laws and protocols are already in place, and bad people have been denaturalized and sent back to their native countries since the 1960's. This is a fact that so many people choose to ignore.
Trump only wants to relax existing denaturalization protocols.
Red herring noted, and appreciated.1.) Trump is a known liar, so you shouldn't believe a word he says .
Red herring #2 noted. Naturalized citizens have had their citizenship revoked for reasons other than criminal justice. Subversives who lied on their citizenship application can be denaturalized (for fraudulent claims).2.) If they are criminal citizens, then they are dealt with here in the US by the criminal justice system.
Red herring #3 noted. Citizens have been denaturalized since the 1960s. The precedent was established DECADES ago. Only the number of denaturalizations have increased, because there are many more subversives in the country today than there were in the 1960's.3.) Allowing citizenship to be stopped sets a very dangerous precedent that will soon be used to attack natural born citizens that are political enemies of Trump.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?