If there are any known groups exhibiting hatreds, like BLM, and contributing to the Republican Party, please let me know and we'll both denounce them.
Perhaps, but you'll not see that on any BLM website.
One of many short-sighted Obama judgments that we’re starting to hear more about these days.
Emphasis on many in the above.
This is what people refuse to understand when they try to act like the civil rights movement just asked nicely. Rioting as rather unfortunate as they are is generally the last ditch effort of the unheard.
We know that is a deliberate lie. The Civil Rights Marchers of the 1960s did not set COPs on fire, pull people from their vehicles and beat them within an inch of their life, or throw objects at passing vehicles. These are acts of terrorists.If any of them knew or even cared about history, they would see that they are behaving exactly as conservatives generally did during the Civil Right's Marches.
BLM is a movement, and the ideals it stands for should be something all Americans support. BLM is not really a group even though it has a group of people who are part of the movement. I have no idea if anyone who is actually part of the movement is committing the crimes that we are seeing, or if there is a faction of extremists who claim to support the movement for their own gains. I also feel like Black Lives Matter members providing a lack of a response to concerns similar to your own hurts the movement because it further alienates people who already oppose the movement.
LOL yeah sure.
BLM is a "movement" the same way Marxism and Fascism are "movements".
The BLM organization has set race relations in this country back 60 years. And if any one single factor will see Donald Trump reelected it will be a push back to all the pandering the left has done toward the BLM organization.
If any of them knew or even cared about history, they would see that they are behaving exactly as conservatives generally did during the Civil Right's Marches. This occurred as the great liberal/conservative shift began to move to either Democrat or Republican. What was a North/South distinction, as represented in the Civil Right's Act votes, became a Democrat/Republican distinction by the end.
- Even with Jim Crow breathing down the country's neck, conservatives dismissed the Civil Rights complaint as exaggerated and began mixing the movement in with the anti-Vietnam element as a distraction. Black people were called anti-American and were called "uppity" as conservatives talked of the "leftist" threat.
- Today, conservatives dismiss the police brutality complaint and focus on kneeling football players as simply unpatriotic. And the current demonstrations are being dismissed via a calculated effort to define the whole as just a violent riot trying to destroy history. Today, black people are called "arrogant" as conservatives talk of the "leftist" and "anarchist" threat.
That’s exactly what your assertion comes down to, since you can’t describe anything about them. And since they can’t be described by a person trying to convince others of said existence, you must be admitting that they don’t exist after all .
I can keep your juvenile “i know you are, but what am I “ schtick going as long as you can. I eat facile sophists for snacks.
This is not a haiku.
What 'sacred ceremony'? If it was so sacred they should have chosen a private venue.You are aware how disrespectful it is to film sacred ceremony, right? The guy could have kept the camera recording and turned it to the floor and put his finger over the microphone. If conflict happened, his excuse to continue filming, he would have been able to quickly release the microphone and move the camera back to start filming again. That video does not show hypocrisy; what it shows is someone who is ignorant of others' beliefs and religion while citing his right to film. That is twice now that you have posted something to me without understanding other people's beliefs.
They asked the man to stop filming, which is their right. Traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions are protected both by state laws and under the auspices of the United Nations. Continuing to film could have resulted in a civil lawsuit. There are also some sacred traditions that are protected by copyright laws.What 'sacred ceremony'? If it was so sacred they should have chosen a private venue.
This is not a haiku.
They asked the man to stop filming, which is their right. Traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions are protected both by state laws and under the auspices of the United Nations. Continuing to film could have resulted in a civil lawsuit. There are also some sacred traditions that are protected by copyright laws.
BLM not hate
If trump wants to play whitey
he needs to wash face
You'll sleep easier now.
BLM is a domestic terrorist organization that needs to be put down with force. Your bigotry is noted, and expected from the mentally-deranged left.
No, it isn't their right. As long as he is in a public place he can film and record, and there isn't a damn thing these hypocritical terrorist freaks can do about it. It's called the First Amendment, you might want to actually read it and get a clue.
And he refused, which is his right. What 'sacred traditions'? Copyright laws? They're copyrighted?They asked the man to stop filming, which is their right. Traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions are protected both by state laws and under the auspices of the United Nations. Continuing to film could have resulted in a civil lawsuit. There are also some sacred traditions that are protected by copyright laws.
We can see the clip. The filmmaker was not inciting violence.You do realize there are limitations to the first amendment imposed by other laws and amendments? Freedom of speech, as an example, does not include the right to incite violence. It seems like you are the one who might want to read through our constitution as well as state laws to understand how our laws and rights really work, especially treaties protecting indigenous people's rights within this country.
What force? Certainly not yours.
And he refused, which is his right. What 'sacred traditions'? Copyright laws? They're copyrighted?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?