The example we've seen during the second term has exposed a serious flaw in the Constitution.
Our president accepted a $2 billion investment from the highest levels of the UAE for his cryptocurrency firm.
There's something more concerning that occurred two weeks later. Our president has also arranged for the UAE to possess thousands of the most highly sought AI chips worldwide.
It's reasonable to question the risk to national Security concerning existing and practically unattainable chips may be transferred to any other world power, including China or Putin.
Trump has exposed the flaw in the Constitution. If the president is supported by enough Senators, impeachment won't happen no matter what crimes actually occurred.
Is there any reason to believe trump will obey anything? Is there any reason to think we still have checks and balances?
First -
Article I, Section 9
"no person holding office "shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State".
Senators recognize the transaction that benefits the president-
Warren, Merkley Seek Records on $2 Billion Trump Stablecoin Deal from UAE Firm and Binance | United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
The Official website of The United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairswww.banking.senate.gov
The chips and the exchange -
The Emoluments Clause, articulated in the U.S. Constitution, forbids the president from receiving any gifts, offices, titles, or emoluments from foreign states without congressional consent.The example we've seen during the second term has exposed a serious flaw in the Constitution.
Our president accepted a $2 billion investment from the highest levels of the UAE for his cryptocurrency firm.
Again, this is not receiving any gifts, so not an issue.There's something more concerning that occurred two weeks later. Our president has also arranged for the UAE to possess thousands of the most highly sought AI chips worldwide.
Post #4The Emoluments Clause, articulated in the U.S. Constitution, forbids the president from receiving any gifts, offices, titles, or emoluments from foreign states without congressional consent.
Of course, an investment is not a "gift", so in this case, no laws or statutes were violated.
Sure, if you ignore the rest of the clause:The Emoluments Clause, articulated in the U.S. Constitution, forbids the president from receiving any gifts, offices, titles, or emoluments from foreign states without congressional consent.
Of course, an investment is not a "gift", so in this case, no laws or statutes were violated.
The flaw is not in the Constitution. The problem is we have a corrupt SCOTUS.
The flaw is not in the Constitution. The problem is we have a corrupt SCOTUS.
The Emoluments Clause, articulated in the U.S. Constitution, forbids the president from receiving any gifts, offices, titles, or emoluments from foreign states without congressional consent.
Of course, an investment is not a "gift" since there is a presumption that it (the investment) will be returned in some manner or form, so in this case, no laws or statutes were violated.
Again, this is not receiving any gifts, so not an issue.
The flaw lies in the constitution that is designed to cement power of the few but the flaws do stem from many of the actors. The system is working according to those who made the system we are dealing with now i dont see another solution other than getting rid of it.The flaw is not in the Constitution. The problem is we have a corrupt SCOTUS.
The example we've seen during the second term has exposed a serious flaw in the Constitution.
Our president accepted a $2 billion investment from the highest levels of the UAE for his cryptocurrency firm.
There's something more concerning that occurred two weeks later. Our president has also arranged for the UAE to possess thousands of the most highly sought AI chips worldwide.
It's reasonable to question the risk to national Security concerning existing and practically unattainable chips may be transferred to any other world power, including China or Putin.
Trump has exposed the flaw in the Constitution. If the president is supported by enough Senators, impeachment won't happen no matter what crimes actually occurred.
Is there any reason to believe trump will obey anything? Is there any reason to think we still have checks and balances?
First -
Article I, Section 9
"no person holding office "shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State".
Senators recognize the transaction that benefits the president-
Warren, Merkley Seek Records on $2 Billion Trump Stablecoin Deal from UAE Firm and Binance | United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
The Official website of The United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairswww.banking.senate.gov
The chips and the exchange -
The problem you have here is that there is no evidence that the President or his administration has anything to do with the cryptocurrency deal.
This whole thing is nothing more than a poorly constructed conspiracy theory.
Trump? Or the Trump Organization?Trump has a 60% ownership of World Liberty Financial.
Trump? Or the Trump Organization?
Please be precise in your answer and please be aware that President Trump has no control over the Trump Organization.
The example we've seen during the second term has exposed a serious flaw in the Constitution.
Our president accepted a $2 billion investment from the highest levels of the UAE for his cryptocurrency firm.
There's something more concerning that occurred two weeks later. Our president has also arranged for the UAE to possess thousands of the most highly sought AI chips worldwide.
It's reasonable to question the risk to national Security concerning existing and practically unattainable chips may be transferred to any other world power, including China or Putin.
Trump has exposed the flaw in the Constitution. If the president is supported by enough Senators, impeachment won't happen no matter what crimes actually occurred.
Is there any reason to believe trump will obey anything? Is there any reason to think we still have checks and balances?
First -
Article I, Section 9
"no person holding office "shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State".
Senators recognize the transaction that benefits the president-
Warren, Merkley Seek Records on $2 Billion Trump Stablecoin Deal from UAE Firm and Binance | United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
The Official website of The United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairswww.banking.senate.gov
The chips and the exchange -
Yes.So you really think that the reality is:
Trump is lawless and breaking the constitution left and right and NOBODY in Government can Stop him ???.......
You're joking. He fired all the watchdogs.But not that:
Trump follows the Law, because he knows the criminals in DC will after him for anything they can, so makes sure he is doing everything on the up & up ?
Be more specific then I can answer.Just go back and look at how many Swamp creatures have illegally went after Trump, and Trump has beat them in "COURT" !
LOL!Yes.
He fired the DEM's who have sabotaged him and he is putting people in place that will help him achieve his promises and goals! And he has the constitutional right/obligation to do so ! The Propagandist have just gotten all the SHEEPLE to feelYou're joking. He fired all the watchdogs.
They said he over valued his house to get a loan, but he had paid the loan back with all the interest and the Bank did notBe more specific then I can answer.
SCOTUSName the institution that can stop him from breaking the law.
You can't say who will stop him because no person or institution can.LOL!
Think about that a little bit more!
But thanks for the laugh.
He is a felon. Why bother when I know you don't care if he breaks the law. That really makes your points worthless.He fired the DEM's who have sabotaged him and he is putting people in place that will help him achieve his promises and goals! And he has the constitutional right/obligation to do so ! The Propagandist have just gotten all the SHEEPLE to feel
Trump is doing something wrong.....
They said he over valued his house to get a loan, but he had paid the loan back with all the interest and the Bank did not
ask the criminals DEM's to bring this case to court !.....
The Bragg's case were he turned a misdomeanor into 34 felony counts base on a "New Legal Theory" (Translation LAWFARE BS)
SCOTUS
Whether it technically qualifies as an emolument or not, It is corruption at a level never before seen in American politics any way you look at it - and that is not in any way an exaggeration or hyperbole.The Emoluments Clause, articulated in the U.S. Constitution, forbids the president from receiving any gifts, offices, titles, or emoluments from foreign states without congressional consent.
Of course, an investment is not a "gift" since there is a presumption that it (the investment) will be returned in some manner or form, so in this case, no laws or statutes were violated.
Again, this is not receiving any gifts, so not an issue.
LOL!!!!!............You can't say who will stop him because no person or institution can.
Those felonies are fake and only exist because our Government was Weaponized by the FASCIST DEMS !....He is a felon. Why bother when I know you don't care if he breaks the law. That really makes your points worthless.
LOL! Wow you are gaslighted !Scotus is afraid to rule against him because they fear he will defy the court again and their authority will be proven to be inadequate. He is currently in defiance of court orders and his lawyers have lied to judges in every case they undertaken.
In addition to ignoring the Scotus, the court has absolutely no way of enforcing their rulings. The scotus has no police force or army. Compliance was based on their authority and Trump has shown that he can ignore supreme Court rulings.
So I am still asking you, who can stop him?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?