This looks real bad for trump. Ignoring bounties on US soldiers because he wants putin to help him get reelected again. Wow....that's bad.
Russian Bounty Suspicions Were Supported by Financial Data - The New York Times
This looks real bad for trump. Ignoring bounties on US soldiers because he wants putin to help him get reelected again. Wow....that's bad.
Russian Bounty Suspicions Were Supported by Financial Data - The New York Times
LOL!!
No. This isn't "real bad for trump".
Your lies don't hurt him at all. You should know that by now.
I can't believe anyone would be naïve enough to believe Putin would help any leader of this country. Oh well.
This looks real bad for trump. Ignoring bounties on US soldiers because he wants putin to help him get reelected again. Wow....that's bad.
Russian Bounty Suspicions Were Supported by Financial Data - The New York Times
The evidence is pretty clear. Trump ignored russian bounties on US soldiers because he needs to keep putin happy.
I wonder what else trump has done for Putin?
I can't believe anyone would be naïve enough to believe Putin would help any leader of this country. Oh well.
More Russia, Russia, Russia nonsense!
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
The nation’s spy chief denied reports that President Trump had been briefed on a U.S. intelligence report claiming that Russian military intelligence was offering bounties to Afghan militants to target U.S. and coalition forces.
“I have confirmed that neither the President nor the Vice President were ever briefed on any intelligence alleged by the New York Times in its reporting yesterday,” Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said in a statement released just before midnight on Saturday. “The White House statement addressing this issue earlier today, which denied such a briefing occurred, was accurate. The New York Times reporting, and all other subsequent news reports about such an alleged briefing are inaccurate.”
I guess the Trump haters think the more this is posted it might come true?
How many times has this story be posted here at DP?
Well it is a fact Russia interfered in the election to favor trump.
More Russia, Russia, Russia nonsense!
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
The nation’s spy chief denied reports that President Trump had been briefed on a U.S. intelligence report claiming that Russian military intelligence was offering bounties to Afghan militants to target U.S. and coalition forces.
“I have confirmed that neither the President nor the Vice President were ever briefed on any intelligence alleged by the New York Times in its reporting yesterday,” Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said in a statement released just before midnight on Saturday. “The White House statement addressing this issue earlier today, which denied such a briefing occurred, was accurate. The New York Times reporting, and all other subsequent news reports about such an alleged briefing are inaccurate.”
No it is a fact that Putin got even with Hillary for interfering in his election. That is how Putin works. Ask any reporter in Russia that has crossed Putin. Well before they are killed if you can. The only person Putin helps is Putin. But I have to give the democrats :thumbs::thumbs: for creativity in spinning the truth though.
More Russia, Russia, Russia nonsense!
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
The nation’s spy chief denied reports that President Trump had been briefed on a U.S. intelligence report claiming that Russian military intelligence was offering bounties to Afghan militants to target U.S. and coalition forces.
“I have confirmed that neither the President nor the Vice President were ever briefed on any intelligence alleged by the New York Times in its reporting yesterday,” Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said in a statement released just before midnight on Saturday. “The White House statement addressing this issue earlier today, which denied such a briefing occurred, was accurate. The New York Times reporting, and all other subsequent news reports about such an alleged briefing are inaccurate.”
It happened in 2016. I can't believe anyone would be naive enough to believe it won't happen again. Fool me once and all that.
No. But it was a great spin by the democrats after Putin schooled Hillary for interfering with his election. She should have never encouraged rioting people to overthrow the government when Putin won. The same as the democrats have been trying to do to Trump since he won the election. Could you imagine during the protest in this country Putin did what Hillary did and told the people it is time to overthrow the government. Well lets say Putin handled it much better than we would. He only punished Hillary.
17 US intelligence agencies in the US say russia interfered in the election to favor trump
No. But it was a great spin by the democrats after Putin schooled Hillary for interfering with his election. She should have never encouraged rioting people to overthrow the government when Putin won. The same as the democrats have been trying to do to Trump since he won the election. Could you imagine during the protest in this country Putin did what Hillary did and told the people it is time to overthrow the government. Well lets say Putin handled it much better than we would. He only punished Hillary.
Nobody is arguing the point they interfered. If you call freedom of speech interfering. The Russians can say whatever they want about who they would like to win an election in any country. Hell we fund candidates with our tax dollars in other countries and send our CIA in to create chaos to interfere in other countries elections all the time. Hell we will send in our military and or assassins to kill leaders. Hillary even stated right after the election that Putin interfered because of what she did during his election. Until the democrats decided it was better to spin it into helping Trump instead of Hillary getting schooled.
More Russia, Russia, Russia nonsense!
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
Spy chief Ratcliffe says Trump never briefed on Russia offering Taliban bounties
The nation’s spy chief denied reports that President Trump had been briefed on a U.S. intelligence report claiming that Russian military intelligence was offering bounties to Afghan militants to target U.S. and coalition forces.
“I have confirmed that neither the President nor the Vice President were ever briefed on any intelligence alleged by the New York Times in its reporting yesterday,” Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said in a statement released just before midnight on Saturday. “The White House statement addressing this issue earlier today, which denied such a briefing occurred, was accurate. The New York Times reporting, and all other subsequent news reports about such an alleged briefing are inaccurate.”
Ok prove it. Let's see your evidence
I can't believe anyone would be naïve enough to believe Putin would help any leader of this country. Oh well.
I already posted it years ago when it was all over the internet how Hillary claimed Putin interfered in her election out spite. Old news. If you shout a lie long enough and loud enough it becomes the truth. This is the glass is half full or half empty argument. You contend that Putin in his admiration for Trump helped the republican party. I contend that Putin vengeance towards Hillary for her trying to incite protestors into over throwing the Russian government when Putin won the election. Trump benefited not because Putin wanted to help any leader of this country but to exact revenge against Hillary. So your contention is Putin helped Trump because he is a nice guy and likes Trump and I contended that Putin did it out of vengeance because he is a bad guy and wanted to get even with Hillary. I stick with Putin being the bad guy exacting vengeance over the nice guy helping his buddy Trump.
I already posted it years ago when it was all over the internet how Hillary claimed Putin interfered in her election out spite. Old news. If you shout a lie long enough and loud enough it becomes the truth. This is the glass is half full or half empty argument. You contend that Putin in his admiration for Trump helped the republican party. I contend that Putin vengeance towards Hillary for her trying to incite protestors into over throwing the Russian government when Putin won the election. Trump benefited not because Putin wanted to help any leader of this country but to exact revenge against Hillary. So your contention is Putin helped Trump because he is a nice guy and likes Trump and I contended that Putin did it out of vengeance because he is a bad guy and wanted to get even with Hillary. I stick with Putin being the bad guy exacting vengeance over the nice guy helping his buddy Trump.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?