• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Admin. to Gut the Endangered Species Protection Act

Ridiculous hyperbole. That's not what this is about. This is about the whole principle of protecting the habitats of endangered species, not a dozen salamanders.
Reducing large issues to ridiculously exaggerated simplicities just wastes your time and attention. You want some ridiculous hyperbole? Here...
You lot won't be satisfied until the only animals left are domestic and living in pens.
How's that for reducing a large issue to an exaggerated simplicity?

Progress has never been held up or halted because an isolated species of an insignificant creature was in the way?

My principle is consistent. Nature displaces or wipes out species all the time, sometimes the mechanism of that is another species. Adapt or die. Humans are a natural part of a natural world.
 
Hey - Doesn't Donny Junior have a god given right to have a stuffed California condor, a bald eagle, and a spotted owl, mounted on his wall? Huh? Well doesn't he? Taxidermy can be a new Trump jobs program! They can teach it at Harvard using government grant money.

/s
Trump wants to shut down windmills claiming they kill birds
 
He is the Grinch spoiling everything good and decent.

Pretty sure he can't just issue "a rule" for something like this. Pretty sure that's Congress's turf.

Then of course, there is the attempt to ignore a SCOTUS ruling...

Just keep giving the Dems advertising ammo for the Midterms, Trump. Always a good idea. :rolleyes:
 
Every Republican is responsible.
 
Republicans used to care about the environment. Now thats socialism lol.
 
Pretty sure he can't just issue "a rule" for something like this. Pretty sure that's Congress's turf.

Then of course, there is the attempt to ignore a SCOTUS ruling...

Just keep giving the Dems advertising ammo for the Midterms, Trump. Always a good idea. :rolleyes:
I think that is the problem, the rule was not from congress, but an interpretation likely
by the EPA of what "Harm" means. Had congress codified it, there would be little Trump could do
to change it, but they choose to leave it open to interpretation by people managing the agency.
 
Pretty sure he can't just issue "a rule" for something like this. Pretty sure that's Congress's turf.
"L'etat, c'est moi!"
-Louis IV-

En Anglaise- "I am the state!"
Then of course, there is the attempt to ignore a SCOTUS ruling...

Just keep giving the Dems advertising ammo for the Midterms, Trump. Always a good idea. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom