There's his word. But I guess the Seargent at arms is a liar?And again, there's no evidence Pelosi told him to say that. Look, I get you really, really want to pin this on Pelosi, but you're gonna have to do better than that.
Break into? No one. The lack of physical security on that building was quite shocking.First, who knew in advance that they would break into inside the Capitol?
Second, there was no testimony because there's no sense in blaming them for what trump did.
Did you verify all 150 million ballots?You haven't read it.
They explain the court cases in six awing states, not the entire country. They verified facts and numbers. They write about:
1. Claims that Dominion Voting Machines Were Manipulated
2. Claims that Ballots Were Not Properly Counted.
3. Claims that Unsolicited Mail-In Ballots Were Sent to Voters.
4. Claims that Voter-Eligibility Requirements Were Not Enforced.
5. Claims that Ballot Drop Boxes Were Not Fairly Located Throughout the State.
6. Claims that Poll Officials Failed to Carefully Monitor the Election Count.
and that's just Arizona.
They have the fact and explanations and you could too.
Please read even just a small portion and tell me why they're wrong.
Quote him saying Pelosi told him to say that.There's his word. But I guess the Seargent at arms is a liar?
Again - absolutely should have been dug into. The fact that the house 'committee' didn't speaks volumes.
Which is why it was imperative Trump made certain the Guard was there.Break into? No one. The lack of physical security on that building was quite shocking.
Look at the reports.Quote him saying Pelosi told him to say that.
That's on the Capitol leadership. They control their building.Which is why it was imperative Trump made certain the Guard was there.
You have to wonder why it was McConnell and Pelosi making the calls to get the NG in and not the president.I read it. And there's no mention of Trump offering the Capitol Police Board National Guard assistance. Trump, however, was the leader. That makes it his responsibility to ensure there was proper security. He failed. Miserably.
Maybe the Democrat voters hate women and minorities
Break into? No one. The lack of physical security on that building was quite shocking.
There was absolutely warnings about the size of the crowd and potential for violence with tensions being so high. Those looking to security on that day recognized the concern. The Capitol Chief of Police recognized the danger - which is why he kept asking.
The massive security failure at the Capitol had zero to do with Trump. The reasons for that failure should have been at the top of the agenda for the house 'committee'. 1) Why was our physical security so poor that protestors can get in, and 2) Why wasn't the police chief provided with the resources he asked for.
There's nothing in there. I accept your concession.Look at the reports.
More to the point, they're going to liberate the city from local leadership?
You haven't read it. That means you want your suspicions and you can't refute the facts.Did you verify all 150 million ballots?
You don't know until you verify all of the ballotsYou haven't read it. That means you want your suspicions and you can't refute the facts.
You don't know until you verify all of the ballots
Each state did that for their own ballots. No fraud.You don't know until you verify all of the ballots
Nope, the modern Mad Lib Progressives rejected the Classical Liberals of the 20th century to endorse all sorts of insane positions, not least the idea that anyone who wants to live in this country ought to be able to do so just because that makes Mad Libs feel like they're generous.Your posts are those of a 21st century American conservative.
21st century American conservatives reject everything America was in the 20th century. They have in fact become what we fought against, namely authoritarianism (left and right).
You guys have rejected the LBJ decades long shift of immigration away from white racist European trash to south of the border. This shift by the Democratic congress was generated because of the fierce and unyielding resistance of white conservatives of European ancestry to the Civil Rights Movement led by MLK Jr.
I expect that perhaps starting later this year, or sometime next year, American conservatives will start wearing their armbands outside the home too.
Your flailing attempt to marshal sesquipedalian terms is nugatory in the face of your non-existent analysis.Your post has presumptive complex question fallacies meaning they are accusations badly disguised as interrogatories that make assertions of guilt or wrongdoing without any evidence or proof. In short there's no there there to the post. Accordingly, a content reply is not merited.
Your silly rewritten dialogue ignores the real thing, where the guards invited the Shaman and others into the supposedly forbidden territory.US Capitol January 6, 2021
"No, this is not a Presidential animal shelter. Now please leave now."
Dumb questions deserve smart answers that show how dumb they were. If you're gonna keep on bangin' your head like that, at least maintain a good rhythm.You can't answer the questions. I will keep asking until you do.
Did someone claim that all the people in Los Angeles are being charged with obstruction?
Are the people in Los Angeles trying to stop the joint session of Congress from convening as the Electoral College?
So far Texas is way ahead of California in terms of peaceful protests. Here's one that happened in April without incident, in San Antonio:As we have seen with the Democrats reflexive resistance to maintaining civil order in LA, sanctuary jurisdictions aren't practicing the passive civil disobedience they want to claim. The so-called peaceful protesters set free speech rights on fire along with the American flag.
So far the only "logic" presented by Mad Libs amounts to, "We believe so hugely in Poor Miguel's right to make money in the US by doing shit jobs off the grid that we're willing to tolerate Creepy Kilmar running drugs and sex slaves."If you had logic on your side, you might not have to manipulate emotion, I don't know. It's a MAGA specialty (see: pets, eating).
But your manipulations don't reflect concern for the suffering of citizens, as citizens are much more likely to suffer at the hands of their fellow citizens, but to foment fear and hatred of undocumented immigrants by stereotyping them.
There, you got all that out at last. I blew off your direct question about "modern" and 20th century "Mad Libs" so now comes the spiel you didn't get to spout.Nope, the modern Mad Lib Progressives rejected the Classical Liberals of the 20th century to endorse all sorts of insane positions, not least the idea that anyone who wants to live in this country ought to be able to do so just because that makes Mad Libs feel like they're generous.
Modern Conservatives also have nothing to do with Conservatives of the 20th century, but keep telling yourself that even a lot of POC citizens, including legal immigrants, turned against Mad Libs because Everything Is Racist (except Mad Libs).
This one cuts to the bone don't it.Your silly rewritten dialogue ignores the real thing, where the guards invited the Shaman and others into the supposedly forbidden territory.
Throwing rocks now are we.Your flailing attempt to marshal sesquipedalian terms is nugatory in the face of your non-existent analysis.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?