- Joined
- Jan 8, 2010
- Messages
- 82,916
- Reaction score
- 75,146
- Location
- NE Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
That is one possible interpretation, but given that Jesus not specifically rule out various categories of government spending, Christians are well within their faith to express that in terms of how they support society versus individual action as that door of "how" was left unaddressed. This means that the act of faith of giving to the poor can be expressed in any number of ways which can be individual, in support of social spending, or something else entirely as long as its done as an act of faith. If anything the answer is in the parable of the three talents and depends on how one perceives whether this type of spending is bearing fruit. However, that measure can be applied to any method of giving as well.And Jesus wasn't talking about governmental entities anyway; the "you" to whom He refers is the individual and that one individual's decision to give alms, clothe the poor, visit the sick, etc.
The point is that the impulse to give comes from the human heart, the individual's heart, rather than a mandate or even expectation. Why, sure, that impulse can move an individual generosity expressed in many ways, but do you donate to state or fed agencies? (No, paying taxes--rendering unto Caesar--doesn't count.)That is one possible interpretation, but given that Jesus not specifically rule out various categories of government spending, Christians are well within their faith to express that in terms of how they support society versus individual action as that door of "how" was left unaddressed. This means that the act of faith of giving to the poor can be expressed in any number of ways which can be individual, in support of social spending, or something else entirely as long as its done as an act of faith. If anything the answer is in the parable of the three talents and depends on how one perceives whether this type of spending is bearing fruit. However, that measure can be applied to any method of giving as well.
If you help the person with the sign at the sign of the road and they use that to buy drugs, your spending didn't bear fruit. If they use it to feed their kids, then it did. If you support governmental spending and it helps a family escape poverty, then it did. However, if a family tries to use it to avoid work, then it didn't.
I disagree. What's happening in your heart is that your "impulse" that you feel is perceived through your moral instincts and that "impulse" is not shared by people who have other moral instincts (and anyone who has some knowledge of moral or evolutionary psychology knows that this "impulse" is not universal or experienced the same way by everyone). I promise you that the "impulse" felt by some isn't individualized but corporate or group based. Because of that, faith is going to be felt and expressed differently. Giving through Caesar totally counts if we simply look at "impulse" as you have presented it and without other qualifiers.The point is that the impulse to give comes from the human heart, the individual's heart, rather than a mandate or even expectation. Why, sure, that impulse can move an individual generosity expressed in many ways, but do you donate to state or fed agencies? (No, paying taxes--rendering unto Caesar--doesn't count.)
I agree with this statement, in part. We are instructed to be wise as wolves and part of that is trying to know outcomes and make wise choices and not simply do good come what may as if you were lobbing some grenade over the fence. If we break down the golden rule for example, if I am stuck in some terrible rut and someone comes along and gives me money that furthers enables me being in that rut, then they have not helped me and they have not done good (and neither have I in such a scenario). That is not how I would want to be treated or to treat another, but rather have actions both be good of intent and result.I believe that I will be judged according to what is in my heart, by what motivated me. If I donate to a food bank and the recipient trades the food for crack or if I give money to someone begging who buys cheap wine with it, this is out of my control. I don't think that the judgment of the world, whether my donations "bore fruit," is the point. At all.
The problem with this assertion is, of course, that in the case of welfare, what you are essentially doing is volunteering your neighbor's money to pay for your good deeds.
Charity is good works. Advocating that the government do it is stealing from your neighbor.
Of course the Kingdom is 'spiritual'. But why does that take away from the physical? Jesus Christ, the God Man, sits today at the right hand of God. (Heb. 1:3) A Man with a physical body sits at the right hand of God in Heaven. Surely you acknowledge that the Son is 'spiritual'.
There is plenty that the Holy Spirit has told us, in the Bible, about the Kingdom. But you refuse it and attempt to negate it by saying all is 'spiritual'. Which doesn't negate it. If just leaves you in ignorance of what the Kingdom is.
I appreciate the time you've spent here in replying.@nota bene, I ran out of time on my earlier response and am adding a supplement here. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the original study I was thinking of, so these other links will have to suffice for my argument (which is also why I took so long to reply, I was searching for that research).
Here is another primer on social giving and how it stimulates the same neural reward centers that you reference in terms of "impulse"
Also:
Ultimately, if you read it, you will hopefully find that a lot of that "impulse" is governed by social context.
Personally, I don't know if Jesus left "how to give" open because of that (I suspect he did, Him being aware of all types of people and sets of moral instincts) or if it was simply out of context for his ministry given the culture of the day, but we do know he never forbade it (and Give onto Caesar is a totally different topic, which is about loyalty and hierarchy. In that passage, Jesus was making a strong point that he was not a political leader and was not subject to the politics/governmental policies of the day in terms of his ministry in response to priests who were trying to trap Him in a logical conundrum).
To each their own however, I find understanding God’s design to be informative for faith. In my view the Christian who is charitable about taxes due to social support is acting in genuine faith that is consistent with scripture as well as the Christian who wishes to express their giving differently.I appreciate the time you've spent here in replying.
However, I am as interested as a practicing Christian in how neural reward centers are stimulated as I am in a discussing the atria and ventricles of the heart when discussing the human heart and its impulses. I am not speaking to electricity.
James 2:26 states, "For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.“Charity, or any other good works, plays no role in defining a Christian.
(Matt. 26:6-16) (John 12:4-6) Who was concerned about giving to the poor instead of anoting Jesus with oil? Judas Iscariot....the betrayer of Jesus.
So, give to the poor, make yourself feel good, and deny Jesus Christ. And what will God the Father say of you?
Lees
James 2:26 states, "For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.“
First of all, I've enjoyed lurking on you guys' discussion..Charity, or any other good works, plays no role in defining a Christian.
(Matt. 26:6-16) (John 12:4-6) Who was concerned about giving to the poor instead of anoting Jesus with oil? Judas Iscariot....the betrayer of Jesus.
So, give to the poor, make yourself feel good, and deny Jesus Christ. And what will God the Father say of you?
Lees
Believe what you wish……you believe in the physical and the material….subject to gravity and time….. Jesus only being able to be able to be in one place at a specific time. Those that get to heaven and can have some time off can decide to drive by Jesus’s house ? And obviously no possibility of Jesus/God/Holy Spirit living within ? Or as a compromise certain times of a 24 day that Jesus is Spirit and other times that He is physical ? It is your understanding of the Kingdom that is ignorance to me…..
Oh gee, giving to the poor and denying Jesus Christ makes one a real Christian? How silly.
Lees
No. Watching poor people suffer without helping, and then heartlessly saying that they are just that way and deserve it because they’re just stupid and lazy and should just be left alone to die on the street, while saying you believe in Christ- makes you a hypocrite.
I believe what the Bible says. Not what I wish. Do you disagree that a Man, Jesus Christ is seated at the right hand of God?
And that Man sits with the Body that was Resurrected by God. Correct? Or do you disagree?
No, your denial of the Kingdom, as presented in Scripture, is the ignorance to you.
Well, of course, there is a difference, so I hope you'll be feeling frisky soon!First of all, I've enjoyed lurking on you guys' discussion..
I agree with your first paragraph, very strongly, you are not defined as a Christian by your works. In fact, it's anti-Christ to hold this in my opinion.
But there is a list of the fruits of the flesh and the fruits of the Spirit in Corinthians, which clearly shows that through God's work in our salvation, the fruits of love, joy, peace, patience, and so on will be manifest.
And the book of James clearly says that someone without the works has a dead faith.
I believe that book was difficult for some people in the history of the church who wanted it stricken from the canon because that seemed so much to contradict a lot of the other narrative of the New Testament, which is salvation comes by faith alone and through Christ's sacrifice.
But I think the key, at least for me, in understanding that tension is the fact that the works prove that the faith is there in the first place. They are not what causes salvation. But rather are evidence of it.
So, I'm not going to be saved by giving to the poor, and if I do so to impress the religious, I'm not impressing God, but if God's message has truly taken hold in my heart, I'm going to help people when I feel Him prompting me to do it, and not for the approval of man.
Maybe later, if I'm feeling frisky, I will give my opinions on the difference between an individual giving and giving through the state, because I think there are differences. But that's another discussion that is also happening here.
I believe in a spiritual kingdom….you believe in a physical and material kingdom….fortunately with the progress of science perhaps your kingdom will be discovered in your lifetime and we can take a plane there together and I will admit that you are correct…..we can both see Jesus sitting there in his chair……my trouble is that I am from Missouri and you have to Show Me…..the God within remains more important to me than the God that is in the far realms of outer space….but, once again, believe what you want…..
And one who gives to the poor yet denies Jesus Christ, what does that do for him?
And of course you are the judge of who is a hypocrite. And one who gives to the poor yet denies Jesus Christ, what does that do for him?
Nah it's clear you just believe what you want. The Bible says people who don't care about the poor and think they will get in to heaven just by being brown nosers are going to a very bad place.No, I don't believe what I want. I believe the Bible.
No, I don't believe what I want. I believe the Bible. You have admitted you believe what you want, irregardless of what the Bible says.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?