- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I gave the point. What more do you want?Joining the military doesn't make one an adult and it has nothing to do with him being killed by a maniac.
Did I say he was a small child?
You're correct, Tryvon was a 'kid', because he sure as hell didn't act like an adult.
LOL only in a Zimmerman/Martin thread can you agree with the other side and still be treated with suspicion.On what evidence?
So what? Far worse things happen to much younger people, but they don't get a media circus like this. Shortly after this crap happened, some 10 year old mexican boy got shot in Houston. He got a paragraph in the paper.Guy kills another guy? :roll:
He was a kid.
Still trying to spin out "logic" from illogical argument?
Tell me, how does walking down the street to the store and back while talking on the phone with your girlfriend minding your own business rises to the level of being "adult enough to know wrong from right"?
Zimmerman is a fully grown adult. Why didn't you question his integrity for not know wrong from right?
Nevermind, it's a bias thing.
He still would have to ask his Mommy and Daddy, iirc. I am not sure that being required to ask Mom and Dad is the same thing as being an adult.He was old enough to join the military.
Given that bulk of teh evidence about who started the physicality comes from Z's questionable narratives, it seems reasonable to at least suspend judgement on that count.Apparently, you completely *blacked out* the physical attack on Z by M
So that means 14 yr olds are adults? Or that M is on trial?M was 17....that's true and whats also true in Florida is any teen/offender older than 14 years of age *regardless of the offense* may be tried as an adult
Unfortunately you conceded when you should have stood firm.I gave the point. What more do you want?Joining the military doesn't make one an adult and it has nothing to do with him being killed by a maniac.
You're correct, Tryvon was a 'kid', because he sure as hell didn't act like an adult.
Given that bulk of teh evidence about who started the physicality comes from Z's questionable narratives, it seems reasonable to at least suspend judgement on that count.
So that means 14 yr olds are adults? Or that M is on trial?
Or what exactly is your point?
Objecting to calling a 17 yr old a kid is silly.
Z's injuries are also consistent with Z losing his balance, with alien attacks and a number of other things.Z's injuries are consistent with his version of the attack plus witnesses support Z's version.
His multiple skull abrasions are not consistent with simply losing one's balance and falling to the ground.Z's injuries are also consistent with Z losing his balance, with alien attacks and a number of other things.
Iirc, there's not a living witness outside of Z and DeeDee [sorta] who witnesses the beginning of the altercation.
Primarily, there's Z account of how things started and that's it. Z's accounts are not reliable.
M is not alone....Forensic evidence speak for M and up to now its all in Z's favor
Z's injuries are consistent with his version of the attack plus witnesses support Z's version.
Under Florida law, Zimmerman can make his self-defense argument at a hearing, citing the state’s “stand your ground” law.
Shhh... Don't tell Spanky.
So, it's legit to kill a person just because of the music he listened to or the tweet he tweeted? So then it's fine for a mass murderers of prostitutes to do what they do because of the prostitutes' background and past criminal offenses?Tryvon was a wannabe gangster, yes. The music he listened to, his FB photos, where he tweeted from, how he dressed, etc. Yes, Tryvon was a wannabe gangsta.
I say 'wannabe' because I don't know that he ever actually joined a gang. He certainly enjoyed the lifestyle, though.
There are a few events that occurred in between Tryvon walking home from the store and Mr. Zimmerman pulling the trigger that you're forgetting to include...but who needs facts, right?
When you start a fist fight instead of simply calling the police, when you knock a guy down and threaten his life, when you reach for his gun...you're not a victim. You're an agressor.
We've had threads and threads and threads on all this already. I'm not going to rehash it. I would just copy/paste what has been said on other TM/GZ threads, offering little original content, bearly more than the 10 character limit the forum requires to post.
You called Tryvon a kid, and I gave you the point. You're right, Tryvon was a kid, because he certainly didn't behave like a mature adult.
If you can show concrete and objective proof of your unsubstantiated claim about “the physical attack on Z by M” then I would amend the “blacked out”. Deal?Apparently, you completely *blacked out* the physical attack on Z by M
M was 17....that's true and whats also true in Florida is any teen/offender older than 14 years of age *regardless of the offense* may be tried as an adult
...he started the fight, made a verbal threat and reached for Mr. Zimmerman's gun. Yes.So, it's legit to kill a person just because....
You are persistent in keeping up with baseless and unsubstantiated claim to make your point despite being told many times. If age is irrelevant then why cried foul?...he started the fight, made a verbal threat and reached for Mr. Zimmerman's gun. Yes.
Age is irrelevant.
..that Tryvon was old enough to join the military....You are persistent in keeping up with baseless and unsubstantiated claim..
...that Tryvon was not a small child....to make your point....
Anyone stupid enough to obsess over this story needs to slit their wrists, get pissed and go jump off a bridge. I'm here to cheer them on.If age is irrelevant then why cried foul?
Are you any less obsess in this case? Go on and be ridiculous...that Tryvon was old enough to join the military....
...that Tryvon was not a small child.
Anyone stupid enough to obsess over this story needs to slit their wrists, get pissed and go jump off a bridge. I'm here to cheer them on.
Look at my post history, no, I'm not :2wave:Are you any less obsess in this case?
Yeah, look at the post history and you’ll find you are attacking other people who argue on your side. But, what does being obsessive got to do with your willing participating in a debate where you have lost your point?Look at my post history, no, I'm not :2wave:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?