Your ignorance on this issue is astounding.
She was covert as described by law.
The CIA director wrote a letter to the judge that she was covert.
Her outing by BushCo put other Americans' lives at risk. It put other countries' intelligent agents in danger. It's amazing that even the most partisan rightee can ignore those ramifications in order to defend Bush's lies to send Americans to an illegal war to die. Holy ****! :doh
Then you should be equally outraged at what Obama did by releasing classified interrogation documents. My God, how many Americans have died needlessly after what Obama did? He is another who should be brought up on treason charges.
BTW, we've given alot more than 600k to civilians in Iraq during this war:
USAID: Assistance for Iraq - Humanitarian Assistance
Treason?
This money went to iraqi civillians, not insurgents and thier families. Not the same. FAIL
Really? He may be questioning their facts. Wow, a benign explanation, I wonder why you did not think of it...
How do you expect me to prove how I see things? Really, how about one post where you are not over the top?
expect him to run and hide from that challenge like rove at a book signing
I asked the question again: is it treason when the U.S. military treats civilians, including those who are family members of insurgents in Iraq?
Yes or no?
Come on, RH, it's a simple question. Wonder why you keep dodging.
Apples and oranges. Not to mention lame. :doh
I'm about to go home. I'll check in later on you, RH. I predict I will never get a straight answer. I warned you to think before you posted, didn't I.
Yes, who is it? Can you quote them. On a link that works?
You have nothing. This is just another in a long, long list of baseless, wild, paranoid accusations from the right. It's stunning, really, just how much bull**** is out there that people spit out and others swallow whole. I don't give a damn about Code Pink, but I believe in the truth.
From Patrick Fitzgerald's press conference:
If you can counter my post with someone who has as much personal knowledge about this as Patrick Fitzgerald, I'd be happy to read it.
HANNITY: You were an agent from 1966 to 1990, and you said that in the Washington Times today she made no bones about the fact that she was an agency employee. Her husband was a diplomat. Quote: "Her friends knew this. Her friends knew this. They told them." In other words, this was not a secret of anybody that they knew.
I mean, actually he describes in his book how, after a make-out session on like the third or fourth date, that she told him. But putting that aside, everybody knew?
RUSTMANN: Well, I don't know that everybody knew. I do know that her cover began to erode the moment she started dating Joe Wilson. The thing that I said was that, you know, when you walk like a duck, and quack like a duck, and look like a duck, you're probably a duck.
And at the point in time that this all broke, Valerie Plame had been working at headquarters for a long time, several years. She went to work every day to headquarters. She was married to a high-profile former ambassador. She had a couple of kids, she was living around the beltway.
HANNITY: Well let me ask you this...
RUSTMANN: She looked like an overt employee.
HANNITY: That would be what I would understand. And you even said in this article — you said that she made no bones about the fact she was an agency employee. Her neighbors knew his, her friends knew this, his friends knew this. This is the quote that you gave them.
I want to ask you a two-part question. Number one, did she ever give you any overt political leanings, number one? And why would she be urging others at the agency, for example, to send her husband, who was clearly opposed to the war that the president was engaged in, to Niger if there wasn't some political motivation?
You start a thread with slanted, biased, propaganda verbage and expect honest debate?
I think you're more hoping for a flame-war. Just my two cents. :roll:
Does your boss know you waste company and Internet bandwidth trying to win arguments you keep losing?
You want to answer my question, since RH can't seem to?
You haven't shown a time when the US has paid money to the enemy during a war.....
That wasn't my question. My question was about your assertion that giving medical aid is treason. Nothing to do with money.
Is it or not?
Yes, or no?
1. quote me where that was my sole assertion. FAIL
Moving goalposts now?
Code pink gave aide, money, comfort to the "other side" the enemies that were killing Americans and thier families.....
This is treason, see article 3 section 3 of the us constitution to deliver yourself from ignorance.
yes, it is treason to provide aid and comfort to the enemy.....
Giving aid to the enemy's family is giving aid to the insurgents who just killed Americans.
Pretty clear what you said.
So when the US military treats the enemy's family for wounds, is it treason, or not?
Simple question.
Seems to any reasonable person that the U.S. military giving medical treatment directly to enemy combatants themselves, let alone their family members - as they routinely do - that goes WAY beyond what Code Pink did.
So...yes or no?
quote and link or stop lying.
So by your logic, why can't we send aid to al qaeda? :doh
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
I did. that was a direct quote from this thread. Message 92.
yes, it is treason to provide aid and comfort to the enemy.....
Giving aid to the enemy's family is giving aid to the insurgents who just killed Americans.
Are you familiar with article 3, section 3 of the US Constitution?
No questions until you answer mine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?