• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

To Mars in three hours

scottyz

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
0
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Moderate


http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=16902006

It certainly would be nice to see this become a reality. As usual i'm surprised more private companies haven't taken interest in such endeavors.
 
Engimo said:
I'm not surprised, the whole thing is a load of horse ****.
So was sailing around the world and landing on the moon.
 
Engimo said:
I'm not surprised, the whole thing is a load of horse ****.

Oh, well I'm convinced. :lol:


Seriously, why is that Mr. Physicist? In lay-man terms please.
 
scottyz said:
So was sailing around the world and landing on the moon.

No, except this guy is considered a bit of a nut and his theories are not accepted by anyone in the physics community. This article doesn't even make any sense - "travelling to other dimensions where the speed of light is faster" is a total misuse of what any physicist is talking about when they refer to "extra dimensions". Also, the idea of using electromagnetic fields to generate gravitational fields is nonsense.

The only way of moving faster than light that is consistent with General Relativity is through the use of an Alcubierre Drive, but that is currently impossible as we have no mechanism for generating the necessary spacetime curvature.
 
Engimo said:
The only way of moving faster than light that is consistent with General Relativity is through the use of an Alcubierre Drive, but that is currently impossible as we have no mechanism for generating the necessary spacetime curvature.
LSD?.......:2wave:
 
cnredd said:
LSD?.......:2wave:

"Tripping balls" is not a reliable method for travelling faster than the speed of light, cnredd. Though, Richard Feynman experimented with LSD, maybe he was on to something.
 
Is it possible to get from Point A to Point B faster than the speed of light? Perhaps. Hopefully we'll know the answer to this question within the next decade or two. But any practical applications of this are much, much farther in the future...even if this theoretical machine could be shown to work, I'd still be against investing large sums of money in it.
 
Being discussed in New Scientist is hardly equitable with being published in Physical Review - Catagory D (Particles, Fields, Gravitation, Cosmology).
 
Tashah said:
Being discussed in New Scientist is hardly equitable with being published in Physical Review - Catagory D (Particles, Fields, Gravatation, Cosmology).

You're more of a physicist than I, Tashah. Explain the nonsense in the article, please. <3
 
Kelzie said:
Oh, well I'm convinced. :lol:


Seriously, why is that Mr. Physicist? In lay-man terms please.


Because a neutron star, which condenses the remaining mass of a large star down to something the size of Manhattan, also compresses that star's magnetic field to millions of times it's original intensity, far far greater than anything we'd be able to generate outside of science fiction, and those stars seem to be really stationary things, or at least as stationary as stars usually are.


Besides, I would expect that even if we could generate magnetic fields that strong, they'd be deadly anyway.
 
Engimo said:
You're more of a physicist than I, Tashah. Explain the nonsense in the article, please. <3
I suspect that she could, but most of us would not understand it, so why bother?
Also, this is not the kind of topic that lends itself to "lay-mans" terms.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…