• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Time for a reality check folks: God did not use Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk simply used God. BIG difference between the two.

S

Showtime586

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2020
Messages
9,025
Reaction score
11,682
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
I could begin by listing several quotes from Kirk that are hateful, derogatory, divisive, discriminatory and/or racist. However, we all know what they are, so there is little need to repeat. Only in the "alternate reality" Maga universe would such comments be considered "Christian" by any stretch of the imagination.

In reality, Kirk simply used the tired old GOP "God, Guns, Gays and Government" playbook in a more modern manner. Kirk coupled these "trigger topics" wirh modern technology and the popularity of social media to promote his divisive message and managed to profit quite well in the process.

Now, it seems that Maga "damage control" responses to Kirk's divisive comments are that he was "misquoted" or that his comments were "taken out of context", or that he was being "sarcastic". If so, maybe one of our DP Magas can elaborate on exactly how Kirk saying that "Biden should be Executed " fits into their explanation of Kirk's comments or their definition of "Christianity".
 
Just exploring here, do you consider Charlie Kirk more aligned with say Joel Osteen in terms of using religion?
 
When he was alive the guy had a limited audience of young people on college campuses. With Democrat's fake outrage his audience and reach is five times what it was. That my friend, is God's will. We are all programed to accept God in our hearts and minds. The pathway to get to that point may not be straight forward nor obvious, but that a necessity to navigate around anti-Christ elements that permeate throughout our society.
 
Showtime586 said:
I could begin by listing several quotes from Kirk that are hateful, derogatory, divisive, discriminatory and/or racist. However, we all know what they are, so there is little need to repeat. Only in the "alternate reality" Maga universe would such comments be considered "Christian" by any stretch of the imagination.

In reality, Kirk simply used the tired old GOP "God, Guns, Gays and Government" playbook in a more modern manner. Kirk coupled these "trigger topics" wirh modern technology and the popularity of social media to promote his divisive message and managed to profit quite well in the process.

Now, it seems that Maga "damage control" responses to Kirk's divisive comments are that he was "misquoted" or that his comments were "taken out of context", or that he was being "sarcastic". If so, maybe one of our DP Magas can elaborate on exactly how Kirk saying that "Biden should be Executed " fits into their explanation of Kirk's comments or their definition of "Christianity".
Click to expand...
There in lies the problem. You would not post the quotes videos, etc. in there full content and context. That has what the left has done with Charlie Kirk's work and passion.
 
Showtime586 said:
I could begin by listing several quotes from Kirk that are hateful, derogatory, divisive, discriminatory and/or racist. However, we all know what they are, so there is little need to repeat. Only in the "alternate reality" Maga universe would such comments be considered "Christian" by any stretch of the imagination.

In reality, Kirk simply used the tired old GOP "God, Guns, Gays and Government" playbook in a more modern manner. Kirk coupled these "trigger topics" wirh modern technology and the popularity of social media to promote his divisive message and managed to profit quite well in the process.

Now, it seems that Maga "damage control" responses to Kirk's divisive comments are that he was "misquoted" or that his comments were "taken out of context", or that he was being "sarcastic". If so, maybe one of our DP Magas can elaborate on exactly how Kirk saying that "Biden should be Executed " fits into their explanation of Kirk's comments or their definition of "Christianity".
Click to expand...
Pseudo Christians gotta have it both ways.
 
dmpi said:
When he was alive the guy had a limited audience of young people on college campuses. With Democrat's fake outrage his audience and reach is five times what it was. That my friend, is God's will. We are all programed to accept God in our hearts and minds. The pathway to get to that point may not be straight forward nor obvious, but that a necessity to navigate around anti-Christ elements that permeate throughout our society.
Click to expand...
You don't believe his racist misogyny was outrageous?
 
Showtime586 said:
I could begin by listing several quotes from Kirk that are hateful, derogatory, divisive, discriminatory and/or racist. However, we all know what they are, so there is little need to repeat. Only in the "alternate reality" Maga universe would such comments be considered "Christian" by any stretch of the imagination.

In reality, Kirk simply used the tired old GOP "God, Guns, Gays and Government" playbook in a more modern manner. Kirk coupled these "trigger topics" wirh modern technology and the popularity of social media to promote his divisive message and managed to profit quite well in the process.

Now, it seems that Maga "damage control" responses to Kirk's divisive comments are that he was "misquoted" or that his comments were "taken out of context", or that he was being "sarcastic". If so, maybe one of our DP Magas can elaborate on exactly how Kirk saying that "Biden should be Executed " fits into their explanation of Kirk's comments or their definition of "Christianity".
Click to expand...
No, actually you need to list them in full and without deleting or shorting the quotes. Video would be best. Your claims mean nothing without verified proof.
 
Integrityrespec said:
No, actually you need to list them in full and without deleting or shorting the quotes. Video would be best. Your claims mean nothing without verified proof.
Click to expand...
I have listened to them and watched videos as well.
Would you like me to post some videos of Kirk's comments that we BOTH know that you watched and are now denying exist?
 
Queen Margo said:
There in lies the problem. You would not post the quotes videos, etc. in there full content and context. That has what the left has done with Charlie Kirk's work and passion.
Click to expand...
Go ahead and tell me how true Christians call for executions of political enemies. I will wait.
I am surprised that you are actually referencing the ridiculous "out of context" bullshit excuse. That one is so easy to debunk.
On a different note, why are you still refusing to explain to me how a female can support a convicted sex abuser? Are you ashamed?
 
Showtime586 said:
I could begin by listing several quotes from Kirk that are hateful, derogatory, divisive, discriminatory and/or racist. However, we all know what they are, so there is little need to repeat. Only in the "alternate reality" Maga universe would such comments be considered "Christian" by any stretch of the imagination.

In reality, Kirk simply used the tired old GOP "God, Guns, Gays and Government" playbook in a more modern manner. Kirk coupled these "trigger topics" wirh modern technology and the popularity of social media to promote his divisive message and managed to profit quite well in the process.

Now, it seems that Maga "damage control" responses to Kirk's divisive comments are that he was "misquoted" or that his comments were "taken out of context", or that he was being "sarcastic". If so, maybe one of our DP Magas can elaborate on exactly how Kirk saying that "Biden should be Executed " fits into their explanation of Kirk's comments or their definition of "Christianity".
Click to expand...
You libs are still trashing the guy for some reason. The mans dead. You had your chance to confront him with these questions before he was assassinated, Now it just looks like sour grapes and impotent rage. How long until you start insulting the widow?
 
Showtime586 said:
If so, maybe one of our DP Magas can elaborate on exactly how Kirk saying that "Biden should be Executed " fits into their explanation of Kirk's comments or their definition of "Christianity".
Click to expand...
Link to full context ?
 
Fletch said:
You libs are still trashing the guy for some reason. The mans dead. You had your chance to confront him with these questions before he was assassinated, Now it just looks like sour grapes and impotent rage. How long until you start insulting the widow?
Click to expand...
I guess you missed the widow insult thread.
It was pathetic
 
Fletch said:
You libs are still trashing the guy for some reason. The mans dead. You had your chance to confront him with these questions before he was assassinated, Now it just looks like sour grapes and impotent rage. How long until you start insulting the widow?
Click to expand...
I knew it was just a matter of time before DP's "closet Maga" had to chime in....lol
In answer to your response, I really had no desire to "confront" Kirk about anything. I try my best to avoid fake Christians, racists, white supremacists and grifters.
In other words, I avoid EXACTLY the same kind of people that Magas seem to be so attracted to.
Having said that, my opinion is that Kirk appears to be the kind of guy that decent people would want to keep their kids away from. But hey, feel free to worship him just like you do the orange scum in the ugly red tie. After all, despite Trump and his disgusting base's best efforts, it is still a FREE country.
Lastly, there are people that despise Trump in MANY political classifications. For some reason, the MAGAT base just cant seem to understand that.
 
Last edited:
Showtime586 said:
I could begin by listing several quotes from Kirk that are hateful, derogatory, divisive, discriminatory and/or racist. However, we all know what they are, so there is little need to repeat. Only in the "alternate reality" Maga universe would such comments be considered "Christian" by any stretch of the imagination.

In reality, Kirk simply used the tired old GOP "God, Guns, Gays and Government" playbook in a more modern manner. Kirk coupled these "trigger topics" wirh modern technology and the popularity of social media to promote his divisive message and managed to profit quite well in the process.

Now, it seems that Maga "damage control" responses to Kirk's divisive comments are that he was "misquoted" or that his comments were "taken out of context", or that he was being "sarcastic". If so, maybe one of our DP Magas can elaborate on exactly how Kirk saying that "Biden should be Executed " fits into their explanation of Kirk's comments or their definition of "Christianity".
Click to expand...
The right wings doing damage control are you sure about that?

Someone on the left hey left wing terrorist murdered Charlie Kirk. Charlie kirk didn't do anything to deserve murder.

Now the media is dishonestly clipping words out of context in the middle of sentences even to do damage control to say see terrorism is good because Nazis even if the fabricated.

So you want me to disprove extremist propaganda?

No Charlie Kirk was murdered there is no damage to control here other than from the left because they did it they celebrated it.
 
Showtime586 said:
I knew it was just a matter of time before DP's "closet Maga" had to chime in....lol
In answer to your response, I really had no desire to "confront" Kirk about anything. I try my best to avoid fake Christians, racists and white supremacists and grifters.
Exactly the same kind of people that Magas seem to be so attracted to.
Having said that, my opinion is that Kirk appears to be the kind of guy that decent people would want to keep their kids away from. But hey, feel free to worship him just like you do the oranfe scum in the ugly red tie.
Click to expand...
Translation--youve never heard a single speech or campus rally by then man but refuse to let ignorance stand in the way of your smears.
 
CLAX1911 said:
The right wings doing damage control are you sure about that?

Someone on the left hey left wing terrorist murdered Charlie Kirk. Charlie kirk didn't do anything to deserve murder.

Now the media is dishonestly clipping words out of context in the middle of sentences even to do damage control to say see terrorism is good because Nazis even if the fabricated.

So you want me to disprove extremist propaganda?

No Charlie Kirk was murdered there is no damage to control here other than from the left because they did it they celebrated it.
Click to expand...
And posters like @Showtime586 are still running cover for the murderer by smearing the victim. Its disgusting really, but thats what the left is.
 
Fletch said:
Translation--youve never heard a single speech or campus rally by then man but refuse to let ignorance stand in the way of your smears.
Click to expand...
It's easier to support terrorism when You Believe that targets of it are evil and that's all that's going on here.
 
Fletch said:
And posters like @Showtime586 are still running cover for the murderer by smearing the victim. Its disgusting really, but thats what the left is.
Click to expand...
He supports terrorism when Charlie Kirk was shot for his political viewpoints, that's the definition of terrorism.

That's no different than saying the US deserve 9/11 or something heinous like that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom