Tim Ryan, D- Ohio, Says world will warm 7 degrees celsius on Maria Bartiromo's show.

code1211 · Feb 10, 2019

Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

Mycroft · Feb 10, 2019

I'm sure a video of the interview will be released later today and I'll be sure to watch it.

I like Bartiromo. She is the quintessential "suspicious cat".

Phys251 · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

gulfman · Feb 10, 2019

My temperature rises when she's on.She's hot.

code1211 · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

The article I linked to said that the Global Climate COULD rise by about half the amount cited by Ryan over the next 81 years.

Ryan said it will rise by that amount in the next 70 years.

Do you have a source he may have been relying upon to support his assertion?

I couldn't find one.

Phys251 · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
The article I linked to said that the Global Climate COULD rise by about half the amount cited by Ryan over the next 81 years.

Ryan said it will rise by that amount in the next 70 years.

Do you have a source he may have been relying upon to support his assertion?

I couldn't find one.

Sounds like you have some exciting research that falsifies the study! So let's see it. Now.

tecoyah · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

Buhttps://e360.yale.edu/digest/trump-administration-estimates-planet-will-warm-7-degrees-fahrenheit-by-2100t this was likely what he was talking about and does not understand temperature designations.

See Donald Trump for the answer.
Trump Administration Estimates Planet Will Warm 7 Degrees Fahrenheit by 2100 - Yale E360

DaveFagan · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

He's a politician, not a scientist. I think he meant 7 degrees Farenheit. That is a figure within the high end realm of reality. It is also a figure calamitous for humans. Species extinction is ongoing at exponential rates and if insects go extinct, so will we. In the meantime, sell that beachfront property.
/

chuckiechan · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

They never seem to tell us what the want the climate to do. Just stop changing! Uhhh... OK...

ttwtt78640 · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
Well I was just stunned by Democrat stupidity again. Maybe it was ignorance. Could have been simply outright lying.

It's often hard to tell with politicians.

Tim Ryan, Democrat Congressman from Ohio, just said with a straight face on National Television that the Global Climate will warm by 7 degrees celsius in the next 70 years.

It passed without challenge from Bartiromo who was conducting the interview.

I can't find any source that supports this assertion. Is there one? I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

How can people with this level of misinformation guiding their actions and thinking be elected to a national office?

This is worrisome in its implication on what these idiots are legislating.

Temperature On Earth To Rise 7 Degrees By 2100, Climate ‘Sensitivity’ May Be ‘Far Higher’ Than Thought

Take the high end (worst case?) celsius climate change scientific guesstimate and then convert it to Fahrenheit (rounding up, as required). Poof - you have the predicted scientific evidence of a total planetary disaster. Next, you proclaim that makes it necessary to have a one world (or at least one party) government.

code1211 · Feb 10, 2019

tecoyah said:
Buhttps://e360.yale.edu/digest/trump-administration-estimates-planet-will-warm-7-degrees-fahrenheit-by-2100t this was likely what he was talking about and does not understand temperature designations.

See Donald Trump for the answer.
Trump Administration Estimates Planet Will Warm 7 Degrees Fahrenheit by 2100 - Yale E360

That presents a whole new level of stupid in our Congress.

Not that any American can handle the metric system, but most at least have the wisdom to avoid it all together.

code1211 · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
Sounds like you have some exciting research that falsifies the study! So let's see it. Now.

Do you have a working understanding of the English language?

Phys251 · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
Do you have a working understanding of the English language?

:lamo

Already with the personal insults I see. Wasn't expect you to telegraph that hard that you were just attempting a drive-by post, but okay then!

code1211 · Feb 10, 2019

DaveFagan said:
He's a politician, not a scientist. I think he meant 7 degrees Farenheit. That is a figure within the high end realm of reality. It is also a figure calamitous for humans. Species extinction is ongoing at exponential rates and if insects go extinct, so will we. In the meantime, sell that beachfront property.
/

The article had all kinds of mush and slush around it's conjecture:

"According to the study, published in Nature, researchers in Australia found that by 2100, the planet could see an increase in global temperatures of more than 3 degrees Celsius, or 5.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and could even exceed 4 degrees Celsius, or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit. By 2200, that number could double to 8 degrees Celsius."

As always in these things, the premise is stated and then the dire predictions are layeered on thick.

Why a Congressman is duped into repeating and exaggerating it further is really a wonder of outlandish gullibility.

I wonder how many bridges in New York he thinks he owns...

code1211 · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
:lamo

Already with the personal insults I see. Wasn't expect you to telegraph that hard that you were just attempting a drive-by post, but okay then!

Your post indicated either that you did not read my post or did not understand it.

Phys251 · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
Your post indicated either that you did not read my post or did not understand it.

:lamo

Let's try this again, shall we? Since you clearly do not accept the scientific opinion on climate change, what research have you published that falsifies it? Simple question.

tecoyah · Feb 10, 2019

code1211 said:
That presents a whole new level of stupid in our Congress.

Not that any American can handle the metric system, but most at least have the wisdom to avoid it all together.

Yeah....rather ignorant, but not when considered in the light of our President.

Harshaw · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

What didn't he "accept"? The Nature study showed a possible increase of 3 or 4 degrees Celsius over the "70-year" span, not 7.

According to the study, published in Nature, researchers in Australia found that by 2100, the planet could see an increase in global temperatures of more than 3 degrees Celsius, or 5.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and could even exceed 4 degrees Celsius, or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit. By 2200, that number could double to 8 degrees Celsius.

What did code say?

I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

So it looks to me that he did, in fact, accept it.

Phys251 · Feb 10, 2019

Harshaw said:
What didn't he "accept"? The Nature study showed a possible increase of 3 or 4 degrees Celsius over the "70-year" span, not 7.

What did code say?

So it looks to me that he did, in fact, accept it.

Hello, Harshaw. Do you accept the scientific opinion on climate change or not?

Jack Hays · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

The study says 7 degrees Fahrenheit, the Congressman said 7 degrees Celsius.

Phys251 · Feb 10, 2019

Jack Hays said:
The study says 7 degrees Fahrenheit, the Congressman said 7 degrees Celsius.

Yes, it's only going to be about a 4C increase, which by all measures would put us into dangerous territory!

Harshaw · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
Hello, Harshaw. Do you accept the scientific opinion on climate change or not?

This question is irrelevant to anything I said.

Therefore, I will note the deflection and repost my question:

Harshaw said:
Phys251 said:

Good morning, Code.

Seeing that you linked to a report that mentions a Nature study, and seeing that you don't accept it, what research have you published in the field of climate science?

Click to expand...

What didn't he "accept"? The Nature study showed a possible increase of 3 or 4 degrees Celsius over the "70-year" span, not 7.

According to the study, published in Nature, researchers in Australia found that by 2100, the planet could see an increase in global temperatures of more than 3 degrees Celsius, or 5.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and could even exceed 4 degrees Celsius, or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit. By 2200, that number could double to 8 degrees Celsius.

Click to expand...

What did code say?

I found one that said warming of about half that level could occur- not that it would occur.

Click to expand...

So it looks to me that he did, in fact, accept it.

Do you have a good-faith, honest answer to this question? If so, please state it.

Phys251 · Feb 10, 2019

Harshaw said:
This question is irrelevant to anything I said.

A question regarding acceptance of climate science in a discussion about climate science doesn't matter? Oh, and I thought my jokes were bad! :lol:

Now let's try the question that really matters again. Do you, Harshaw, accept the scientific opinion on climate change? Yes or no. Simple question. Yes or no.

Harshaw · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
A question regarding acceptance of climate science in a discussion about climate science doesn't matter? Oh, and I thought my jokes were bad! :lol:

No, acceptance of the Nature study, something you said he didn't do.

Obviously, you're going to continue dodging the question, so that in itself is answer enough. You misread either his post, the article, or both, and you thought that the study supported the idea of a 7-degree Celsius rise, when it did not, and you thought you had a "gotcha!" on code, when you didn't.

Which you now, of course, are transparently trying to deflect to anything you can in order to avoid admitting it.

I tried to have a good-faith exchange with you. I regret that you were not interested in that.

Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

humbolt · Feb 10, 2019

Phys251 said:
A question regarding acceptance of climate science in a discussion about climate science doesn't matter? Oh, and I thought my jokes were bad! :lol:

Now let's try the question that really matters again. Do you, Harshaw, accept the scientific opinion on climate change? Yes or no. Simple question. Yes or no.

Why, you're having your very own Shiela Jackson Lee moment. How cute.

Tim Ryan, D- Ohio, Says world will warm 7 degrees celsius on Maria Bartiromo's show.

Genius is where you find it.

Purge evil with Justice

Purge evil with Justice

Illusionary

Iconoclast

Sometimes wrong

Purge evil with Justice

Purge evil with Justice

Illusionary

Filmmaker ● Lawyer ● Patriot

Purge evil with Justice

Traveler

Purge evil with Justice

Filmmaker ● Lawyer ● Patriot

Purge evil with Justice

Filmmaker ● Lawyer ● Patriot

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency