BirdinHand
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 43,204
- Reaction score
- 79,027
- Gender
- Female
So, you believe we are all in one gigantic “simulation”?
So, you believe we are all in one gigantic “simulation”?He said the reported cost of $20 million for the 20-year project was minuscule compared to its value, and estimated that remote viewers saved the government about $240 million by helping find lost Scud missiles in the Persian Gulf War. Research has shown that remote viewing works 15 percent of the time or more, he said. "There is a huge percentage of intelligence collection systems that don't do as well."
The information provided by remote viewers, he reiterated, was never used without other types of corroboration. He said nearly every agency with an intelligence wing -- including the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secret Service, the Coast Guard and Customs -- employed remote viewers at some time or another.
On a typical workday, McMoneagle said, he reported to an old, leaky wooden barracks at Fort Meade, where he went into a one-person office. He sat at a desk with a typewriter and a mug of coffee. The cup said This End Up and had an arrow pointing the wrong way. He was then presented with sealed envelopes -- sometimes large brown ones, sometimes small white ones -- and he was asked to supply information about whatever was inside.
There might be a photograph of a person, and he would be asked to describe where the person was located. In that way, he said, he helped the Army locate hostages in Iran. He said he predicted almost precisely where Skylab was going to fall, 11 months before the spacecraft returned to Earth in 1979. He named the city in Italy -- Padua -- and described the second-floor apartment where Brig. Gen James Dozier was held hostage by the Red Brigades in 1981. The information arrived in Italy on the day Dozier was released.
Over the years, McMoneagle said, he was involved in about 450 missions. One of his favorites was in 1980, when CIA personnel captured a suspected KGB agent in South Africa. They wanted to know how the agent was communicating with the Soviet military. They put an envelope on McMoneagle's desk, and without knowing anything of the man, McMoneagle told the CIA that the man liked to use a small pocket calculator. The calculator turned out to be a disguised short-wave radio.
Last week he appeared on "Nightline" and on the ABC special "Put to the Test." "It's not like he handed me a perfect photograph of the location," said independent producer Ruth Rivin, of Elemental Productions, when asked about McMoneagle's performance. "Some of the descriptions were pretty remarkable," she said. "We followed all the scientific protocol laid out by Edwin May, a nuclear physicist {at SRI} who's been researching remote viewing for the last 20 years."
Washington Post: UP CLOSE & PERSONAL WITH A REMOTE VIEWER
You are a wise and insightful person and a fantastic contributor to our musings...And?
Personally no. I believe we exist in a giant 'created' universe but it doesn't appear to be hosted on computer of the future. That said, if we mere humans can acquire the ability to create a computer that simulates virtual people who experience life as we do, I suspect it would happen. Under the banner of science of course.So, you believe we are all in one gigantic “simulation”?
I would like to see that as well. I posted an interview for discussion for people who are interested. I'm not trying to convince anyone this is true.I’d love to see links to the scientific articles and observations on which these claims are based- so that we know it’s actually based on science and is not just wild speculation.
Even “scientists” have been known to do that.
But I asked why he himself hasn't mastered remote viewing, not McMoneagle. Anyone can do it, so I figured he would learn it to bolster his theory.He said the reported cost of $20 million for the 20-year project was minuscule compared to its value, and estimated that remote viewers saved the government about $240 million by helping find lost Scud missiles in the Persian Gulf War. Research has shown that remote viewing works 15 percent of the time or more, he said. "There is a huge percentage of intelligence collection systems that don't do as well."
The information provided by remote viewers, he reiterated, was never used without other types of corroboration. He said nearly every agency with an intelligence wing -- including the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secret Service, the Coast Guard and Customs -- employed remote viewers at some time or another.
On a typical workday, McMoneagle said, he reported to an old, leaky wooden barracks at Fort Meade, where he went into a one-person office. He sat at a desk with a typewriter and a mug of coffee. The cup said This End Up and had an arrow pointing the wrong way. He was then presented with sealed envelopes -- sometimes large brown ones, sometimes small white ones -- and he was asked to supply information about whatever was inside.
There might be a photograph of a person, and he would be asked to describe where the person was located. In that way, he said, he helped the Army locate hostages in Iran. He said he predicted almost precisely where Skylab was going to fall, 11 months before the spacecraft returned to Earth in 1979. He named the city in Italy -- Padua -- and described the second-floor apartment where Brig. Gen James Dozier was held hostage by the Red Brigades in 1981. The information arrived in Italy on the day Dozier was released.
Over the years, McMoneagle said, he was involved in about 450 missions. One of his favorites was in 1980, when CIA personnel captured a suspected KGB agent in South Africa. They wanted to know how the agent was communicating with the Soviet military. They put an envelope on McMoneagle's desk, and without knowing anything of the man, McMoneagle told the CIA that the man liked to use a small pocket calculator. The calculator turned out to be a disguised short-wave radio.
Last week he appeared on "Nightline" and on the ABC special "Put to the Test." "It's not like he handed me a perfect photograph of the location," said independent producer Ruth Rivin, of Elemental Productions, when asked about McMoneagle's performance. "Some of the descriptions were pretty remarkable," she said. "We followed all the scientific protocol laid out by Edwin May, a nuclear physicist {at SRI} who's been researching remote viewing for the last 20 years."
Washington Post: UP CLOSE & PERSONAL WITH A REMOTE VIEWER
Watch out for Campbells...never invite them to a sleepover.
Very interesting and fascinating interview with a former NASA physicist who says that all his claims he has tested & backed up with verifiable scientific experiments
No virtual universe exists.
Lots of crying tooLots of Twitter spam in this thread.
That’s up to your experience. I tend to use Bluesky.Lots of crying too
Is that why you don't cry about Bluesky spam?That’s up to your experience. I tend to use Bluesky.
Generally Bluesky posts don’t contain disinformation.Is that why you don't cry about Bluesky spam?
Generally Bluesky posts don’t contain disinformation.
[citation needed]
BlueSky is the Social Media version of the DP Fight Club. It's where liberals go when they lose an argument.
Granted, DP Fight Club is superior since BlueSky is chock full of death threats.
[citation needed]
That only covers part of your argument.Jesse Singal: Bluesky Has a Death Threat Problem
It was supposed to be a gentler, left-wing alternative to X. My grim experience proves that just isn’t the case.www.thefp.com
View attachment 67560983
View attachment 67560984
That only covers part of your argument.
So show me some of what you’re talking s out of you are going to reference it.You need proof that liberals use Fight Club when they lose an argument?
My reference is to read the fight club forums.
So show me some of what you’re talking s out of you are going to reference it.
Which thread is this?Your denial is meaningless. They have a thread where all the liberals cheer when non-liberals are suspended, you make threads labeling non-liberal members. It's where you bitch and moan amongst yourselves. It's probably 90/10 split in favor of liberals/progressives posts versus everyone else down there.
You know it's true, even if you can't admit it.
Which thread is this?
Hmm. So what are these theoretical threads called?LOL. Two versions of the one of the thread types I mentioned are pinned at the top of the Fight Club, and there are at least 2 versions of the labeling thread (trolls, Putin puppets) are on the first page and a whole bunch of threads where mostly liberals go to bitch about other posters. Stop playing stupid, that doesn't come off to other people the way you think it does.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?