• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This whole "making new money" thing (2 Viewers)


It can be used to pay off the debt, the only reason the debt exists in the first place is political. In order to be able to pay off the debt the Treasury would have to assume the money-creation role that the Fed currently has. These were separated to prevent that power from being affected by politics. All that would need to happen is that a law would need to be passed authorizing the treasury to add the required money to the treasury general account for the purposes of paying off the debt through an appropriations bill, and then it would be used accordingly as bonds come due. No new bonds would be issued so when outstanding bonds mature the debt is extinguished. Currently that's illegal and so the laws would need to be changed to be able to pass such a bill.

Because the Treasury's job is to cover the TGA, the way that the funding system works now is that congress passes appropriations bills that spends money in the TGA, and it's the Treasury's job to make sure it doesn't go negative. They do this via deposits from tax revenues (IRS) and issuance of debt. The debt issued is bought by private investors, but also by the Fed, who creates money out of thin air to do so, almost like what banks do when they lend.
 
Last edited:

im confused even more now. so are you saying we basically don't owe any other countries anything? and our nations "debt" is just a ledger for how much money we have earned on the world market? if that is the case then why is called a debt. my personal debt is what I owe someone. whenever I earn money its called a profit not debt. is government really that a** backwards????!! haha
 
Last edited:
what I don't like the most about this is the fact that the us can and does create dollar bills out of thin air. the bills themselves aren't worth anything they are essentially just an I.O.U. and promise from the federal reserve. so why are they allowed to create as many pieces of these papers as they want? are they making promises they cant keep by making more federal notes than they can back by the reserves?:shock:
 

I'm saying that creating dollars does not cost our government any real resources; no gold, no bushels of corn, no oil. That is a government's privilege. It can be taken too far, of course, but as long as the economy can meet the new demand, government deficit spending is not only not a problem, it is a benefit. That money is (generally) spent into the economy, and businesses produce in order to earn it.

Our nation's debt is a measure of how much we have spent (net); add up all of our federal deficits (many) and surpluses (few) and you will get the "national debt," plus MB. On the other side of that, dollar/bond savings is a measure of how much other entities (China, Japan, Saudi Arabia, banks, businesses, people, etc.) have saved (in dollars) over the years, from their earnings. All of that is available to spend; some people just choose to save their dollars instead.

Why is it called a debt? Political stupidity. That started a long time ago. I prefer to call it "bonds outstanding."
 

Dollars are backed by the economy's production, and the bills are worth whatever they can buy.

All money is debt. Bank-created money is just formalized I.O.U.s that are transferable. When you want to borrow money that you don't have, you promise to pay back the debt. Since your I.O.U.s probably don't mean much to other people, you go to a bank, whose I.O.U.s are readily accepted. You promise to pay the bank, the bank gives you some of it's rock-solid I.O.U.s (dollars), and you are able to buy, say, your house with those I.O.U.s.

What we are left with is a big pile of assets (dollars) and a big pile of liabilities (debts still owed), and these provide most of the dollars that our economy operates on. Lots of these I.O.U.s never even get "redeemed." There is no harm in the government buying in to this with some of their own dollars.
 
would you or anyone recommend a book, website, movie, or anything of the sort to learn more about this? its all confusing to me but id like to learn about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…