- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 41,134
- Reaction score
- 18,437
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
And you don’t get to decide what is allowed or not.We aren't talking about a charity and we aren't allowing deflections to Trump.
Rejected.
Bye.
$16k. Wow lol
A USAID employee responsible for overseeing agency contracts created a fictitious company to illegally obtain coronavirus relief funds for personal gain, federal prosecutors announced Friday.
“Yusuf Akoll worked as a Senior Procurement Contract Specialist at the U.S. Agency for International Development,” according to a previously unreported court document. “From at least in or around March 2021, and continuing through at least in or around August 2021, Akoll [made] materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements…that resulted in Akoll receiving two [Paycheck Protection Program] loans totaling approximately $16,666 that he was not entitled to receive.”
Prosecutors allege that in November 2020, Akoll registered a company in Virginia named Naagode Consulting LLC and then applied for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan under the federal COVID-19 relief program. He claimed to be employed by Naagode and stated the funds were needed to avoid layoffs.
Who cares which websites Dave Van Zandt thinks are biased or not? Do you think because he created his own website that he's the authority on bias?
The FAO has existed in both Dem and Republican administrations, you do realize ?NOt if they were kicking back money to themselves. The democrats are scum and don't mind taking our tax dollares to enrich themselves and friends. HOw anyone can defend this is beyond belief.
Show me in the law where Congress appropriated spending for embezzlement by bureaucrats. I’ll wait.Congress appropriated the spending.
How many times does this need to be gone over?Congress appropriated the spending. If Trump’s mafia thugs try to come in and break the law, locking the doors is the right thing to do.
"If". Any evidence other than a report from a far-right source?Even if they were breaking the law?
Show me evidence that any such thing occurred in this case.Show me in the law where Congress appropriated spending for embezzlement by bureaucrats. I’ll wait.
Independently corroborated evidence, or just a right-wing report from a less than reliable far-right source????
Civil disobedience?
Stealing taxpayer money?
And YOU approve of it?
I'm not surprised.
I’m not claiming that congress appropriated funds for DOGE.Show me in the law where Congress appropriated spending for embezzlement by bureaucrats. I’ll wait.
I realize MAGA has a hard time with reality being unable to be changed on a whim, but Trump’s not allowed to rewrite the law.How many times does this need to be gone over?
Congress appropriates money in general. Agencies, usually decide how/where/when to spend it. If that process is corrupt in the practice of the how/when/why, what difference does it make to you (or me) that 'Congress appropriated it'?
When your starting premise is wrong, not only is there no argument you can make, continuing to make the same foolish one isn't a good look.I realize MAGA has a hard time with reality being unable to be changed on a whim, but Trump’s not allowed to rewrite the law.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?