• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

These Are America’s 10 Most Dangerous Small Cities


Brooklyn is the new hipster heaven. Lots of trendy restaurants and bars and such. People don't go to Manhattan anymore.

Sure there are places that you probably don't want to be in after dark but by and large Brooklyn is a cool place to visit.
 


Been to Toronto a couple of times. Beautiful city. Canada in general is a great place to visit. One of my fondest memories is the week we spent in Quebec City. No one even complained about my high school French
 

I always enjoy it when one of the deep thinkers on here, raises the level of debate.

btw, why did you choose the name flamethrower?
 
I always enjoy it when one of the deep thinkers on here, raises the level of debate.

btw, why did you choose the name flamethrower?

I can usually burn-up unsubstaniated opinions---like in this thread. No one is providing a shread of proof to challenge the facts I presented.

Since you are obviously so wise, and such a deep thinker yourself, you must already know the demographics of all the most violent cities in the nation.

However, for those that only fill their minds with the garbage fed to them by the Major Media (USA Today, CNN, NBC and the like)---the brainwashed and ignorant will give the same PC line about these places "being poor" and being a product of "gun violence---and on and on."

Now, if you have any facts that counter the truth, please let me know. Please let me know if any of the listed cities in this thread are:

Majority Asain, White or Native American.

Have a majority of the victims and suspects that are the same as above

Have very good arrest and clearance rates (if you don't know what that means, then look it up).
 

LMAO you havent provided ANY facts that say its ethnic demographics, none. Take a stats class and get back to us. Nobody educated, honest and objective is gonna take your claim seriously.

using the broken logic in your post Shaq was a better shooter than MJ because Shaq shot 58% and MJ only 49% :lamo

Please, Lets us know when you have facts that support your claim. thanks
 
Been to Toronto a couple of times. Beautiful city. Canada in general is a great place to visit. One of my fondest memories is the week we spent in Quebec City. No one even complained about my high school French

I used to visit Quebec City every year when I was in highschool and university. I always found the French people there to be much more tolerant of your French if you tried whereas in Montreal if you didn't have perfect French they were far less pleasant. That was a long time ago so I don't know if it's the same now.
 
Brooklyn is the new hipster heaven. Lots of trendy restaurants and bars and such. People don't go to Manhattan anymore.

Sure there are places that you probably don't want to be in after dark but by and large Brooklyn is a cool place to visit.

I had been in NYC, including Brooklyn, a few days prior to the riot/protest last year. It certainly isn't as violent or dangerous as it used to be, but from a purely risk assessment and awareness perspective, it is wiser to steer clear of the areas that the patrol officers will tell you, "It's dangerous in there," of which, within Brooklyn, there are areas exactly like that. I apologize if you thought that I meant all of Brooklyn was bad, because I wasn't and it isn't.
 


I already showed the links on post #28.

But, the facts are the facts. Trolls and others can only rant and rave, but being Trolls---that is what they are--- they can't bring in any relevant facts into the discussion.

The facts are: the demographics/culture of all the ten most dangerous small towns, the Ten Most Dangerous Cities in the US, and the 25 Most dangerous neighborhood in America are All that way because the large enclaves of Blacks thugs, and to a lesser extent, Hispanics thugs, are allowed to continue without proper judicial restraints.

Even if some of the dangerous towns on the three lists are majority White, Asian or Native American---all have large enclaves of Blacks and Hispanics that commit violent acts far outside their represented numbers.

Take another example on the list, North Little Rock, AR. Even though it is barely majority White, Blacks there are the ones doing the majority of the violence---as in this recent case:

Update: Suspect, 17, Arrested for NLR Murder - Arkansas Matters

Now, if my figures are wrong, please come up with any hard evidence in any of the Top Ten most dangerous places in the US (cities small cities, and neighborhoods) are products of Native American, White or Asian violence.

Top 25 Most Dangerous Neighborhoods in America - 2014 - Neighborhood Scout

Most Dangerous Cities in America

These Are America's 10 Most Dangerous Small Cities - Movoto
 

Happy Saturday, bubba! :2wave:

Hey, I see Canton, Ohio, on the list, which totally surprised me! Some years ago, I got a call from my neighbor telling me there was a young man sitting in my garden eating my green peppers and was he a friend of my sons? I looked outside and nope, I didn't know him from Adam. The neighbor came over then. The man apologized but said he was hungry since he was hitch-hiking and traveling on foot trying to get to his parent's home in West Virginia and had no money to buy food, and offered to work for what he had eaten. God! We fixed him a bag of sandwiches and some tomatoes, gave him a couple cans of Coke and a few dollars, and he thanked us and left. Never saw him again. Surprisingly my dog had not barked to warn me that a stranger was on my property! :shock: So WTH was that all about - some cosmic test or something? I've never figured that one out! :mrgreen:
 


You are a kind soul, Pol. Can't say my reaction would have been the same.
 
You are a kind soul, Pol. Can't say my reaction would have been the same.

I think now that it was because my dog was not alarmed, which is why I didn't call the police. I had a German Shepherd then who could have torn the guy's throat out. I'm glad I didn't, but I can't say that my reaction would be the same today! Totally weird, though! :shock:
 

1.)once again you are simply proving you have no understanding of stats and how they work LOL there is NOTHING here that makes your claim a fact. Honest and educated people will never buy it.

2.) I agree you havent posted any that support you claim yet and make it factual.
Like i said stats dont correlate to yor claim. My example already proved how mentally retard and dishonest your correlation is lol

Per stats I could claim Shaq was a better shooter than jordan becase shae shot almost 10% better. So the FACT is shaq shot 10% high FG% but it is NOT a fact that he is a better shooter. LMAO

3.) deflections and failed insults only further show how unsupportable your false claims are. If you thing your claims are factually all you have to do is show it, so far this hasnt happened in any way.

4.) not a fact :shrug: again thank you for proving you dont understand facts and stats and how they work

5.) BOOM! an there you have it, the phrase "my figures" points to the huge dishonest failures in your claims. You "figures" do not correlate to your claim. LMAO thank you for AGAIN proving this.

Once again, Please, Lets us know when you have facts that support your claim. thanks
 

I don't see a problem here with education levels, simply a matter of brainwashing and deliberate misinformation by the Major Media.

You buy the same line media liberals feed you. Whites commit most the murders in the US, therefore, Whites are the bad guys. But there is something called "relative risk." Young Black males are but 1% of the US population, yet commit 25% of the murders. These rates are proven fairly well in Chicago.

Chicago is the most dangerous large city, with many of her neighboorhoods among the 25 most dangerous and violent.

Here are the plain facts:

Chicago per 2010 data, had 2,700,000 residents.

Whites were 33.3%, Blacks 34.2% and Hispanics 28%. So all three majors groups are each about 1/3 of the total.

Looking at the Chicago Police Crime report for 2011, it gives the following facts on murders:

https://portal.chicagopolice.org/po...s/Statistical Reports/Murder Reports/MA11.pdf

433 Murders in 2011.

Blacks 326 75% of total
Hispanics 82 18% of total
Whites 20 5% of total
Other 5

Given DOJ and other sources, Blacks kill other Blacks 93 percent of the time.

A look at statistics on black-on-black murders | PolitiFact Florida

So even though the Chicago statistics show that Blacks commit 15 times more murders than Whites, we can give then the benefit of the doubt that they may only commit 14 times more murders.

In our county, there are consistantly 30 times more murders in the 80% Black city nearby, than in our rural and suburban of roughly the same size that is 78% non-Black.

The reasons why crime patterns do not fully match demographics 1:1 (although demographics ARE the most telling) is that our country has a superior police and criminal justice system that is not ran by liberal Democrats and other socialists.

If you are a very bright person, you can also see that murder case clearance rates in Chicago go down as murders go up.
 

wow thats a lot of made up assumptions that are factually wrong and then a bunch of states that still dont support your false claim

once AGAIN, please take a stats class so you understand them and then in your next post PLEASE ets us know when you have facts that prove your claim.

heck just ONE fact that proves your claim would be great! thanks
 

I've taken stat classes before.

Now who is the one hear with NO evidence to back up their claims?

The Liberal crime studies you drool over must use state crime data instead of local crime data to mislead the public.

And you haven't even provided ONE study to back up your claims that ethnic demographics is not most common driver of violent crime in the US.

Please let me know when you've looked at my stats and can disprove them.
 

1.) retake them then because you are ignoring the information they provide. Each post of your proves that fact.
2.) what claims are you talking about? I havent made any claims? me and many others simply pointed out the fact that your states do not support your claim and we are waiting on FACTUAL evidence that make your claim true. Please try to keep up
3.) BOOM! and there you have it!thank you for proving my point, 1.) not a liberal LOL but you going there is VERY telling and shows biased 2.) me nor any other educated, honest and objective person would solely use crime states to judged races of people because that "logic" is mentally inane
4.) not needed, i made no such claim, again stats would of taught you this too, YOU made false claims and cant back it up, WE are asking you for facts to support that false claim and you have none. Nothing is needed by us.

again, when you have ONE single fact that makes your claim true, please let us know, we are waiting . . .thank you
 

Excuse me, but you're the one who has nothing to show in this thread.

No facts.

No "stats."

Nothing but empty complaints.

Perhaps you could provide some of your insights on the crime problem listed in this thread.

I could use a good :lamo
 
Excuse me, but you're the one who has nothing to show in this thread.

No facts.

No "stats."

Nothing but empty complaints.

Perhaps you could provide some of your insights on the crime problem listed in this thread.

I could use a good :lamo

translation: you are STILL dodging and deflecting and got NOTHING


nobody honest, educated and objective falls for it, your OP completely failed lol

maybe in your NEXT post you will ONE single fact that makes your claim true, please let us know, we are waiting . . .thank you
 

Didn't think you'd have something intelligent to say except your same Trolling remarks. Even the least informed posters I've seen here have done better.

:lamo
 
Didn't think you'd have something intelligent to say except your same Trolling remarks. Even the least informed posters I've seen here have done better.

:lamo

another dodge, thats what I thought.
asking you to back up your failed claim is not trolling, try loooking that up too, deflections like that wont work. lol
Once again, could you PLEASE back up your failed claims with ONE single fact that makes it true . . one, thats all we are asking . .

thank you
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…