- Joined
- Jul 23, 2018
- Messages
- 47,452
- Reaction score
- 37,779
- Location
- Zeb's Mountain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
um God knows that; some how the fish of all kinds survived because now we have fish in lakes, oceans and rivers.
the Genesis story doesn't get into every last detail, just enuf to record what happened.
go with this: God said it, i believe it, that's good enuf for me.
otherwise you have Zero way of knowing, it might have been a miracle. it could have been in a protected salt area or something else.
best thing to do, is ask God in heaven when we get there. but we may not....
why?
heaven is such an amazing place, you wont care about the fish in Noah's day. (i don't care now, so sure aint gonna matter when i first find my Mansion on Gold street.
hope to see you there Concerned, you are tired of this dirty old world right ?
blessings, July 9 and we made it. next stop is August 1
.
Or, much more likely is that there was not a worldwide flood, Noah was a story that got exaggerated with time, and too many people can't understand that. That is a much more logical, reasonable, and likely scenario.um God knows that; some how the fish of all kinds survived because now we have fish in lakes, oceans and rivers.
the Genesis story doesn't get into every last detail, just enuf to record what happened.
go with this: God said it, i believe it, that's good enuf for me.
otherwise you have Zero way of knowing, it might have been a miracle. it could have been in a protected salt area or something else.
best thing to do, is ask God in heaven when we get there. but we may not....
why?
heaven is such an amazing place, you wont care about the fish in Noah's day. (i don't care now, so sure aint gonna matter when i first find my Mansion on Gold street.
hope to see you there Concerned, you are tired of this dirty old world right ?
blessings, July 9 and we made it. next stop is August 1
.
Did you watch the video from Gutsick Gibbon? She absolutely shows in several ways why your "kinds" argument is purely made up bs. That doesn't mean that the word kind or how you use it is made up, but rather that the concept of taking kinds instead of species cleans up that problem when it comes to the story of Noah's Ark. It doesn't. There are far too many things that don't fit. I get that YECs, and especially the leaders of these movements don't want to accept these things. But the science is there, as is the logic.KIND is the English equivalent of the Hebrew word min (מִין) found in the Bible thousands of years ago. Even though there is nothing wrong with scientific terms, one must still understand that our scientific words are relatively new. However, while one cannot judge the new terms, likewise one cannot judge those from antiquity.
I don't think that ancient man was less talented than man is today. In fact they likely had far more street smarts, as they could survive in a world without many thingOr. And you know, just hear me out on this.
But when this great flood supposedly took place, people were even stupider than we are now.
Like a lot stupider. And they didn't even know about most of the rest of the geography of the world.
So maybe a flood for one country or even one big section of a continent could be considered a "world flood."
I remain, skeptical.
As I was saying...
There is no arguing that earlier men were more naive, less informed about the world, so somewhat at least more gullible.I don't think that ancient man was less talented than man is today. In fact they likely had far more street smarts, as they could survive in a world without many thing
As I was saying...
What Does the Bible Say About Reward?
“Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven.
There is no arguing that earlier men were more naive, less informed about the world, so somewhat at least more gullible.
But people today even will exaggerate stories, even telling things that are completely nonsensical as if they really happened because they believe they did, regardless of how illogical it is. In this case though, a massive but still local flood would absolutely appear to be "global" to someone who has absolutely no clue how big the earth really is.
apparently i have Posted the Truth about 19,000 times here at DP and have become the number One prophetic source of Information for the last 2 years.
my record is close to 100% most of the time, because i know how to Interpret stuff that the rest of you over look.
@LittleNipper is in the same channel, he just keeps preaching to the Unwashed masses and another Gift to this forum.
tomorrow is just one more day my Prophetic Vision will shine here at DP, i suggest you heed my cry.
blessings, we are about there.
.
Just more religious nonsense, not evidence.Matthew 24:1-43
1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers (VARIOUS) places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.
9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand
16 Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains:
17 Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house:
18 Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.
19 And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!
Religioys nonsense is all theists have to offer for their claims.Just more religious nonsense, not evidence.
Geology Finally Makes Sense -- Thanks to Noah's Flood:Just more religious nonsense, not evidence.
This is a part of cyclic flooding and in no way is evidence of your alleged world flood. It never even covered all of the US at one time. It is from glaciers melting in Canada (mainly). It happens every 5k-7k years and is normally confined to the Rocky Mountain area but can be much larger or simply different places. The Mississippi also floods too, so you don't even have evidence of it being at one time, but rather many, many, many different major floods.Geology Finally Makes Sense -- Thanks to Noah's Flood:
This Folding Rock Cannot Exist Without Noah's Flood:This is a part of cyclic flooding and in no way is evidence of your alleged world flood. It never even covered all of the US at one time. It is from glaciers melting in Canada (mainly). It happens every 5k-7k years and is normally confined to the Rocky Mountain area but can be much larger or simply different places. The Mississippi also floods too, so you don't even have evidence of it being at one time, but rather many, many, many different major floods.
Hell the Mississippi flooded in 1993.
No one "knows" what happened during a flood that didn't happen. This guy is simply trying to use bits and pieces of evidence to fit into his religious beliefs. It isn't the same thing. Not at the surface is why he's wrong, and any honest, non-YEC would be able to show why his attempts here are nonsense.
The marine animals are in layers. He's proving his own claims are BS because he can't understand the different layers that are set down over millions, 10s of millions of years. You will see complete ecosystems buried together when it happens during various major events to kill off some of these dinosaurs. It's simply a single, major local event, not a worldwide flood. I've been to the WY Fossil Butte. They will show how it happened over and over again, so not in a single worldwide flood.
It absolutely can exist without that flood. You are allowing YECs to lie to you, to convince you it can't exist, hence why all your sources are from them, not any from secular scientist who show how.This Folding Rock Cannot Exist Without Noah's Flood:
Your question makes no sense.How Did the Earth AFTER Noah's Flood? The reality is that the presently the Colorado River isn't carving away but silting up deposits ---- watch this presentation:
The proof of the FLOOD and the motives for disproving that the FLOOD happened are becoming more and more apparent ---- as atheists do their level best to discredit honest researchers. But their demeanor often exposes how they really feel and the lengths they go to prove their case.
I'm sorry but many individual earn money as professors, write books, and talk on television programs to promote themselves and their Uniformitarian studies. Can you honestly say that individuals who devote their lives to research are not entitled to make a living from their investigations. This seems very unfair and one-sided of you ---- if not unethical. Pay us but don't pay them isn't how things should work. Was COSMOS a propaganda television show that Carl Sagan put together to get people to believe what he was peddling?It absolutely can exist without that flood. You are allowing YECs to lie to you, to convince you it can't exist, hence why all your sources are from them, not any from secular scientist who show how.
Tectonic processes explain the folding rocks, not a global flood.
The guy in your video works for Answers in Genesis and/or for other YEC sites, companies, people who make money off of actually selling YEC as an idea.
They aren't entitled to not being called out on what they are claiming, proven wrong. I've provided evidence of why he is wrong, from several different sources.I'm sorry but many individual earn money as professors, write books, and talk on television programs to promote themselves and their Uniformitarian studies. Can you honestly say that individuals who devote their lives to research are not entitled to make a living from their investigations. This seems very unfair and one-sided of you ---- if not unethical. Pay us but don't pay them isn't how things should work.
They aren't entitled to not being called out on what they are claiming, proven wrong. I've provided evidence of why he is wrong, from several different sources.
He is not doing real scientific research when he starts from the premise that he is only working to prove the Biblical account correct and will dismiss anything that is evidence against it. Those working for those organizations have to sign pledges to reject any info that contradicts the Bible, including the biblical flood.
That means that they are not holding any scientific integrity, because they can't.
You can't be a real scientists and automatically pledge to reject any scientific evidence that goes against your beliefs.
Yes, yes, yes.... And I've provided very forthright contrary opinions that make an explanation without trying to belittle, insult, or make fun of those that wish to believe anything to the contrary. Do evolutionists and Uniformitarian researcher disregard the Bible under the pretext that it is unreliable, unbelievable, and just myth? I see nothing at all wrong with using the Bible to formulate an investigation, anymore than someone applying Darwin's, ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION. To say otherwise sounds rather disingenuous of you.They aren't entitled to not being called out on what they are claiming, proven wrong. I've provided evidence of why he is wrong, from several different sources.
He is not doing real scientific research when he starts from the premise that he is only working to prove the Biblical account correct and will dismiss anything that is evidence against it. Those working for those organizations have to sign pledges to reject any info that contradicts the Bible, including the biblical flood. That means that they are not holding any scientific integrity, because they can't. You can't be a real scientists and automatically pledge to reject any scientific evidence that goes against your beliefs.
The bible isnt evidence at all.very good. the Bible should come first as Evidence
The bible isnt evidence at all.
It is iron age fables and fiction.
Judgement day is fiction.better re-think before Judgement day.
Try reading actual science and learn critical thinking and logic.try reading and ask God for guidance and a new heart. then enjoy heaven in this life and the next friend.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?