It is clear now that the president will be quite happy to bring about this apocalypse – which would pull most of the developed world into interminable recession – if he could be sure that it would result in long-term electoral damage to his opponents.
Capitalism is, by its nature, dynamic: it creates transitory disparities of wealth constantly as it reinvents itself. Fortunes are made and lost and, as old industries are replaced by new, the earnings that they create rise and fall. Punishing those who exceed some momentary average income and artificially subsidising those who fall below it – as well as providing for a universal standard of living which bears no relation to merit or even to need – has now reached the unavoidable, unaffordable end of the line.
So who will tell the truth – and then act on it?... That without a radical reduction in government intervention, the free and prosperous West will have been a brief historical aberration?
The West is signing its own death sentence - Telegraph
your metaphors and parables are awful. Nobody wants to kill the goose, they want it to share a very few eggs to people that otherwise may not be able to feed their children. Your hyper unregulated invisible hand has already killed entire nation states in sub saharan africa and is way ahead of the game in terms of destruction.
Any which way, we've let the government steal too much wealth, make promises they couldn't keep (since when have PONZI Schemes worked?) and now we're in a world of hurt.
I hope you've prepared yourselves.
Translation for Parasite Nation: At some point government won't be there for you... "it" will hit the fan, and all those goodies you were promised, all those rosy scenarios, all the rhetoric about punishing the wealthy... hits those in the teeth who are most vulnerable... those hooked on government.
You can't kill the Geese laying Golden Eggs and expect a bounty of gold. Envy of what others have is a terrible state of mind. It's perverse and comes with real costs. But... that's Socialism's Parasite Nation.
Good to see a leftist admit publically what leftists constantly deny: that fascism is indeed a form of socialism.Bush created more socialism than FDR...course, it was all for the rich and corporations as any good fascist would do. Seems to me the right is good to go on socialism for corporations but, in connection with its republican made born again evangelical cult, is against it for the American family and worker.
So wait, Germany is now socialist? But they have private property and private ownership of industry. Apparently, people and places are only socialist when things are going well.And SOCIALISM works fine...............and it will forever.
Germany has the economic strengths America once boasted - Los Angeles Times
They steal the wealth of the working homeowner, then they steal the wealth of the Government.
Tracking the $700 Billion Bailout - The New York Times
More stealing of USA wealth by a drunk extorsionist Wall Street criminal......
'Drunken' Broker Sent Oil to 8-Month High in 2009: Report
And SOCIALISM works fine...............and it will forever.
Germany has the economic strengths America once boasted - Los Angeles Times
Too late... the killing fields have been long in action, and you voted for The Executioner.Nobody wants to kill the goose
ROTFLOL... that's why we have 16 Trillion of debt?they want it to share a very few eggs to people that otherwise may not be able to feed their children.
This is what happens when ignorance hits a keyboard.
You really believe that?
And let people share. I believe wealthy folks have a responsibility to assist. Most do.
How and when should be of their doing. They should be free to choose.
Coercion from depraved Socialists is not freedom.
For example... the more cash someone like Buffett can generate allows him to generate more. Better in his hands than a Socialist Regime.
If he's like Carnegie and disgorges himself of it at the end of his life... fine... if not... fine too.
"hyper unregulated"... that's the USA? (Facepalm).Your hyper unregulated invisible hand has already killed entire nation states in sub saharan africa and is way ahead of the game in terms of destruction.
ROTFLOL... are we sub Saharan Africa? Not yet, but the purveyors of Parasite Nation are bringing us closer.
Thief again stealing the ideas of others without due credit. Thief alert.
Perhaps the USA just needs a bit of rest from capitalism forced dynamic activity (i.e., one has to reinvent things to eat). Perhaps it is in order for a nation to experience for themselves how other governing styles work and learn from it by experience. All you know by now is what you read from books right. Well, perhaps you should try it, but I'd suggest to not rest too much in it.
You're a rookie here I see.
Welcome rookie.
You're writing to... my bet... the top .01% of the most traveled posters in Debatepolitics.
Someone who has opened, consulted and run businesses in foreign Socialist lands. I know their red tape. I know the cost of doing business in these places. I know of the paralysis when it comes to upward mobility. I know how these regimes make it possible for those who know how to work the system to move forward... most cannot afford it.
Know what? It is protection against competition. It's a rigged game. Hate to say it, but government is my best agent against competition.
That's socialism. I know it. I've lived it. I live it.
Socialism fails everywhere it is tried.
Nice try, but... Try again.
Hope you have prepared for when government hits the fan... hopefully a little better than the Greeks because that's the result of Socialism hitting the fan.
So wait, Germany is now socialist? But they have private property and private ownership of industry. Apparently, people and places are only socialist when things are going well.
So wait, Germany is now socialist? But they have private property and private ownership of industry. Apparently, people and places are only socialist when things are going well.
Did I call him a socialist? I have called him a collectivist, a statist and a leftist, but I dont call people socialists too often.So NOW you finally use the correct definition of Socialism. So exacltly how does this definition apply to Obama? Apparently you only use the correct definition when it suits your argument.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?