No. They just want somebody to blame for their mismanagement skills.The democrats have done a terrible job of running California, they don't like federal interference and all of a sudden they want Trump to Help.
Its a legitimate question. The other poster seems to be critical of Trump because he hasn't "proposed funding changes" like Obama did in 2015. Did governor Brown implement Obamas proposal? If he did, were they effective? If no to either, WTF. Why care that Trump hasn't yet "proposed funding changes" to Gov Neusom.
I think most Californians would like the Trump regime to just get out of their affairs. Bluster, lies, and threats don't actually solve anything.No. They just want somebody to blame for their mismanagement skills.
Exactly.No. They just want somebody to blame for their mismanagement skills.
The Trump regime isn’t in their affairs.I think most Californians would like the Trump regime to just get out of their affairs. Bluster, lies, and threats don't actually solve anything.
So you're just willingly going to follow along with this and ignore the fact that it was a direct jab at others.He seems to think he'll be able to negotiate a third term. He's said it on multiple occasions and also said he doesn't joke. It would require dismantling our system of government, but that's what he's been all about.
Hello, bot of Russian persuasion. Unchallenged control, as you put it, is actually much more recent in CA. And it still doesn't really exist, as we remain saddled with crazy policies like Prop 13 from decades ago. But you are correct, IMHO, that where liberals get to write the laws with no opposition, dumb laws happen with terrible real world consequences. If we had someone other than an unhinged lunatic on the other side, we might get a better balance. (And no, no sane person would "support the Trump administration" -- do better.)The Trump regime isn’t in their affairs.
Liberal Democrats have had complete unchallenged control in California for a few decades. They have made a mess out of what was one of the best places to live in America. They have no one to blame but themselves.
The cluster-screw which is California isn’t at all on Trump. I’d be willing to bet that a lot of Californians would support the Trump
administration doing something to correct the path liberalism put them on.
California is a perfect demonstration of how liberalism is a failure in every way.
12 more years.So you're just willingly going to follow along with this and ignore the fact that it was a direct jab at others.
Alright, I'll bite.
Where has he put forward motions to have a third term made available for himself?
Any of these actually negotiations?
Him calling up anyone to have anything ratified, or new provisions passed?
Come on now. You should have something.
So just like the others I've asked, you have nothing.12 more years.
So you're just willingly going to follow along with this and ignore the fact that it was a direct jab at others.
Alright, I'll bite.
Where has he put forward motions to have a third term made available for himself?
Any of these actually negotiations?
Him calling up anyone to have anything ratified, or new provisions passed?
Come on now. You should have something.
You know, being caught lying really isn't something that helps you.
The quote, in context, is "We'll win 4 more years, and then we'll negotiate." So, in your mind he switched to a joke mid-sentence, and nobody laughed. Nobody laughed at what is the funniest joke ever in your mind.
So, you say he's lying about these "negotiations." He made a real funny joke and all the "humorless liberals" in his crowd didn't laugh.
You know, being caught lying really isn't something that helps you.
Then again. I still don't see proposed legislation. Just you crying and moaning, about Trump doing what he normally does.
Once again: Are there any legislations, or proposals put forward for this whole premise?
Did I say that it was a hilarious joke?Lying? Did he say it or not? Did anybody laugh at the really hilarious joke?
He said he'll win 4 more and THEN negotiate. Meaning afterward. So either he will do it in his next term (if he wins) or he outright lied to his supporters.
Guess you've never been to W. WA, W. OR or N. CA where trees are tall enough to cross entire yards, roads, etc etc etc. You'd insist people cut down all their trees? .
It doesn't help when leftist are setting fires intentionally
The burning lands are Mostly Federal, Not State as they should be.
Did I say that it was a hilarious joke?
Your side has been called out on lying about these things before. You repeatedly either take his words out of context, or competently ignore when something is a joke, or you even don't take account to something just being his opinion.
Everyone knows a third term is not actually possible. So who are you really trying to fool with this continued act?
He said he's entitled to it and didn't agree to a peaceful transfer if power if he loses.
I'm sorry, but it is a realistic solution. Solar and wind, even harnessing water would go a long way to fixing the electrical fire problem. And paying people to relocate is another good idea. And who cares if the lines break if they are underground?? The power can be shut off, and those lines can be repaired without setting fire to vast acreage and "suburbs and towns." The realities are that the climate has been altered and now all we can do is adapt. Admittedly these are not simple problems nor are they inexpensive. Thanks!!Also not a realistic solution. Entire towns burn. Suburbs burn. And while putting lines beneath the ground helps in some ways, it's not a great idea in earthquake and mudslide areas. The lines break. The lines break or have to be replaced under normal circumstances and finding and fixing those breaks is very expensive.
But you can tell the farmers and ranchers and the small communities and services and businesses that they need to survive that they shouldnt live where they do.
Except that's what the actual professionals say is needed. You guys only laughed at it because Trump dared agree with them and you couldn't let him have any 'points'You guys were the laughingstock of the world the last time you guys suggested this.
It took some determination to post that false a message. He has discussed it extensively and publicly - and has promised federal aid.Of course he hasn't. He and his scum lied about COVID, quashing a testing plan because he figured it to his political advantage that COVID kill lots of people in blue states, so that he could then score points by blaming Democrats. What are massive fires in a blue state to a walking crime against virtue such as he?
Besides, California didn't rake its forests, so it probably deserves it.
So you are literally unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts your position, and then you claim your position is uncontradicted. Trumpers personified.So just like the others I've asked, you have nothing.
Where ya putting the farmers and ranchers and businesses in the communities that serve them?I'm sorry, but it is a realistic solution. Solar and wind, even harnessing water would go a long way to fixing the electrical fire problem. And paying people to relocate is another good idea. And who cares if the lines break if they are underground?? The power can be shut off, and those lines can be repaired without setting fire to vast acreage and "suburbs and towns." The realities are that the climate has been altered and now all we can do is adapt. Admittedly these are not simple problems nor are they inexpensive. Thanks!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?