• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Origin of the Universe...

Daisy said:
Which is more reasonable? To believe that no one created something out of nothing or someone created something out of nothing?
Click to expand...
False dichotomy. And the metric is neither belief, nor reasonability.
 
Daisy said:
Which is more reasonable?
Click to expand...

Reason is the final frontier today, going where no thread has gone before.

Daisy said:
To believe that no one created something out of nothing or someone created something out of nothing?
Click to expand...

amen Daisy.

when they start reasoning they will see yur POV. the Creation is so great, it demands a Creator.

but they stubborn....until they meeet God.


ooooops.


prophecy a.webp...some wake up when the Preacher shows them Prophecy, a longer shot but could happen.

this is the Day the Lord has made, let us rejoice and be Glad in it.

Glad.


.
 
Last edited:
reinaert said:
It's not answerable, because nothing it presupposes is shown.
Click to expand...

Why are you even here if you just give quick one-liners instead of actually engaging in discussion. What exactly is the point?
 
watsup said:
Why are you even here if you just give quick one-liners instead of actually engaging in discussion.
Click to expand...
Cool. This is dialogue. It's just not me making declarative statements about largely unknowable events.

watsup said:
What exactly is the point?
Click to expand...
That the original question, as asked, does not invite a response about what occurred, or likely occurred, to precipitate the cosmos as we know. It merely insists on framing that event, such as the word applies, in terms of the false premise that belief can ascertain physics.

As a side note, I think arguments about the knowability of the timelessness that precedes time are all faith assertions.
 
It won't work until the 2nd stage becomes balanced with the 1st stage.
A saucer type 3 stage then will work for proper re-entry into an atmosphere.

Sorry E'Dolpph. It's sort of like the Trucks design; it is a pack of Horse shaz.


MSN

www.msn.com

A couple of twin launches and ya have a Deep space assembly happening, guys and gals partying across many billions of space travel miles.

Thinking one launch, one deep space vehicle with human aboard is dumbest thing i ever heard.
 
Last edited:
Daisy said:
Which is more reasonable? To believe that no one created something out of nothing or someone created something out of nothing?
Click to expand...
Space time happens with an explosion of a Singularity. Space time becomes many Millions of our year's thoughts immediately
and continues expanding. Eternity means forever, it's been going on forever. (all of eternity)

Many universes are out there. No end to the thought of numbers or years is our thoughts. Trillions is also a meaningless number.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom