• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The one and only 2023-24 College Football Thread

multivita-man

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Messages
35,722
Reaction score
38,118
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Here's the rankings according to the NCAA site. :rolleyes:


1. Georgia
2. Michigan
3. Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Penn State
6. LSU
7. Florida St
8. USC
9. Washington
10. TCU

Something tells me this is way wrong. I do agree that Ohio St is a top 5 team. Every other team is a wildcard. LSU-Florida St will settle their shit in week 1, so we'll have at least some idea of how improved they are since last year.
 
Here's the rankings according to the NCAA site. :rolleyes:


1. Georgia
2. Michigan
3. Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Penn State
6. LSU
7. Florida St
8. USC
9. Washington
10. TCU

Something tells me this is way wrong. I do agree that Ohio St is a top 5 team. Every other team is a wildcard. LSU-Florida St will settle their shit in week 1, so we'll have at least some idea of how improved they are since last year.
Might as well get all of them up there so we can follow the shuffle. It probably won't take 3 games before a few of these rankings are turned upside down.

11. Utah
12. Tennessee
13. Notre Dame
14. Clemson
15. Oregon
16. Oregon State
17. Texas
18. Tulane
19. Texas Tech
20. Kansas State
21. Iowa
22. North Carolina
23. Wisconsin
24. Ole Miss
25. UTSA
 
Might as well get all of them up there so we can follow the shuffle. It probably won't take 3 games before a few of these rankings are turned upside down.

11. Utah
12. Tennessee
13. Notre Dame
14. Clemson
15. Oregon
16. Oregon State
17. Texas
18. Tulane
19. Texas Tech
20. Kansas State
21. Iowa
22. North Carolina
23. Wisconsin
24. Ole Miss
25. UTSA

I may be wrong, and having been a former employee of Oregon, I may be biased, but I like the Ducks chances this year. The PAC-12 shakeup is gonna be a thing but I guess the Ducks were trying to get ahead of that by being the first to bolt the PAC-12 for Big.

Oregon in general is an athletics school, mainly because Phil Knight, founder of Nike, has determined to make it so. Oregon has come close to winning the natty on a few occasions but were just a few studs short. I think the former Georgia guy as their HC and their move to BIG makes them a tougher competitor.
 
Here's the rankings according to the NCAA site. :rolleyes:


1. Georgia
2. Michigan
3. Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Penn State
6. LSU
7. Florida St
8. USC
9. Washington
10. TCU

Something tells me this is way wrong. I do agree that Ohio St is a top 5 team. Every other team is a wildcard. LSU-Florida St will settle their shit in week 1, so we'll have at least some idea of how improved they are since last year.
They screwed up the list. Nebraska is not #1
 
They screwed up the list. Nebraska is not #1

BWHAHAHAHA

Seriously, I think Matt Rhule is a good coach and will probably make them as competitive as they were under Bo Pellini. I thought Scott Frost was that guy and shit, he came so close in so many games. I'm guessing Rhule wins most of the games that Frost lost but even so, we're talking 9-3, 10-2. Good? Sure, but it ain't Tom Osborne.
 
BWHAHAHAHA

Seriously, I think Matt Rhule is a good coach and will probably make them as competitive as they were under Bo Pellini. I thought Scott Frost was that guy and shit, he came so close in so many games. I'm guessing Rhule wins most of the games that Frost lost but even so, we're talking 9-3, 10-2. Good? Sure, but it ain't Tom Osborne.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed. I also thought Scot Frost was going to be the one. He was a great quarterback at Nebraska and had a great track record as a coach. But it didn't work out
 
Last edited:
Conference realignment chaos; PAC-12 turned down $30 million a school;
Iowa/Iowa State sports betting scandal, using Mom’s accounts;
Cal and Stanford talk to the ACC is lunacy.
NIL, transfer portal, huge money donors;
Good luck former Gov. Baker running the ncaa.
 
Cal and Stanford talk to the ACC is lunacy.

In fact, it makes sense. Other than the Ivy, the ACC has the best academic schools. Stanford and California belong.
 
In fact, it makes sense. Other than the Ivy, the ACC has the best academic schools. Stanford and California belong.
Coast-to-coast plane flights back and forth during the week make so much sense for all the sports in all the new mega conferences; academics mean NOTHING in realignment;
 
Coast-to-coast plane flights back and forth during the week make so much sense for all the sports in all the new mega conferences; academics mean NOTHING in realignment;

Its not that big a deal, think about it.
The non power 5 conferences spend more time on busses than the majors do in the air.
A 3 hour flight becomes a 5 hour flight.
Totally travel time differance is negligible.
The world is much smaller today. Its 2023.
This kids are not taking trains.

Peace
 
Conference realignment chaos; PAC-12 turned down $30 million a school;

Okay, now it makes sense.

Iowa/Iowa State sports betting scandal, using Mom’s accounts;

Hadn't heard about this one.

Cal and Stanford talk to the ACC is lunacy.

Sheer lunacy.

NIL, transfer portal, huge money donors;
Good luck former Gov. Baker running the ncaa.

Mark Emmert presided over the end of college athletics as we know it. He's a ****tard.
 
In fact, it makes sense. Other than the Ivy, the ACC has the best academic schools. Stanford and California belong.
Stanford and Cal belong in the Atlantic Coast Conference?
 
Stanford and Cal belong in the Atlantic Coast Conference?

I almost hope that we end up with BIG and SEC mega-conferences and then the NCAA steps in and ends conferences or somehow comes up with 4 mega-conferences. East, West, North, South and then divisions within.
 
Okay, now it makes sense.



Hadn't heard about this one.



Sheer lunacy.



Mark Emmert presided over the end of college athletics as we know it. He's a ****tard.
Stanford wrestling coach Rob Koll, long-time successful coach at Cornell, says Stanford is tougher academically to get admitted to. He sees the positives of going ACC for Stanford wrestling. The ACC only has 6 wrestling schools.

Three flights, one for VA VA Tch, Pitt, one for NC, NC St, Duke and the 3rd for conference tourney. Of course wrestling means nothing here. It’s about football money.

He did lament the problems with sports like baseball. These new schools (Oregon) aren’t getting a full share of the money they make off of players compared to the old schools (Nebraska) Lots of people like the basketball fit for the Big 12 (+4)

There’s a new clock rule for first downs, bowing to the sports books and the under.
Initial ratings inevitably lead to the same teams in the chosen four with easy schedules.
These public schools have budgets for NIL payment money and the transfer portal.

Edit: Coach Koll also mentioned the concern parents have of coaches recruiting over their recruits with transfer portal ‘mercenaries’ for a year, maybe two.
 
I almost hope that we end up with BIG and SEC mega-conferences and then the NCAA steps in and ends conferences or somehow comes up with 4 mega-conferences. East, West, North, South and then divisions within.
I wonder if there is a model they could pattern themselves after?
 
Yes, I'd like to hear specifics.

I have had nothing but positive results.
I don’t understand what your post means. Where would you like me to start? Let’s start small. Ever hear of Terelle Pryor?
 
answer my question.
You didn’t “ask a question.” You want specifics, there is a character limit here. How many years have you been aware of the NCAA.

I did, however, ask you a question. Want to start there?

I’m not going to spoon feed you, if you truly want a dialogue, you’re going to have to work a little.

Now back to my question; ever hear of Terelle Pryor?
 
You didn’t “ask a question.” You want specifics, there is a character limit here. How many years have you been aware of the NCAA.

I did, however, ask you a question. Want to start there?

I’m not going to spoon feed you, if you truly want a dialogue, you’re going to have to work a little.

Now back to my question; ever hear of Terelle Pryor?

Go back and looked

I asked you a question

You replied with a question

In grade school we were taught not to do this

Now will you back up your words or not?
 
Back
Top Bottom