- Joined
- Jul 14, 2006
- Messages
- 1,390
- Reaction score
- 328
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Personally I consider breaking apart at 30,000 feet moving 700 mph a lot more inconvienent than any of the new requirements. In fact I think it's about time. I've seen a pattern of getting lax after each terrorist incident. As I indicated in another post our inspection of our luggage a few days ago missed several things.
The planet will thank us for flying less.
IMO, these new requirements do nothing to assist in making flying - which is already very safe - even safer, smack in the face of common sense, and make something that was relatively painless overbearing.
This is destructive critism.
Anything constructive?
Are you an expert in this area?
I, for one, am not happy about all this security, but in todays world, it is necessary.
Its the root cause of terrorism that must be addressed.
Not an expert but in the Air Force my job when working in the passenger terminal did deal with security and screening of passengers on any military or civilian aircraft that we were handling. My current job still requires me to be familiar with the rules and regulations.
Welcome Sarge. I may not agree with you but welcome aboard! As you know from WS I was a Sgt. in the ANG. (Formerly Mirror Lake 444).
The planet will thank us for flying less.
Hello there!
My point was that all these new procedures would not have prevented what happened. As it was said in another post it gives the appearance of something being done but it doesn't address or solve how the guy got the explosives on the plane. Two very different things.
Hello there!
My point was that all these new procedures would not have prevented what happened. As it was said in another post it gives the appearance of something being done but it doesn't address or solve how the guy got the explosives on the plane. Two very different things.
The correct response is the eradication or permanent isolation from modern technology of all aspects and persons of Militant (Traditional) Islam.
Other approaches are like trying to make accommodation with the cobra loose in your house.
Before anyone "yanks my chain" about prejudice and intolerance, I didn't make the rules, the Mohammedans did.
It was kinda nice when everything was grounded after 9/11
New precautions in security will not help, if we have information that is not passed.
This kind of thing is why Dept. of Homeland Security was formed.
One would think after his father went to the Embassy,that he would have been put on a no fly list and had is visa pulled.
Dept. of Homeland Security failed.
State Dept. failed
And if you throw in what happened on the Army base.
FBI failed
Defense Intelligence Agency failed
Dept of Homeland Security failed.
The correct response is the eradication or permanent isolation from modern technology of all aspects and persons of Militant (Traditional) Islam.
Other approaches are like trying to make accommodation with the cobra loose in your house.
Before anyone "yanks my chain" about prejudice and intolerance, I didn't make the rules, the Mohammedans did.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?