Banned? Good gracious. Who will enforce your ban and what will the punishment be? (penal code transitions to penile code)
Sounds like you want Sharia type law in this land.
What makes me severly mitigating the chances of having a child when I am not financially or emotionally ready to care for a child by using a condom during sex "taking the good away"?
Why not? Why does it matter if they have sex and you view it cant have a "legitimate sexual act" in your opinion? Why does marriage and your opinion of a "legitimate sexual act" matter? Aterall isnt marriage in its form "unnatural"? I mean I can still have legitimate sex (because based on your opinion its when you can reproduce) when im not married.. What does sex have to do with marriage? And how is marriage natural?
But you said the state derives its authority from natural law. So you need to explain how its natural then...
Would gay couples have to be 'caught in the act' to be prosecuted?
Meaning that authority can't violate the natural law.
Your appeal to 'natural law' as an end run to avoid admitting you are referring to religion and specifically Catholiscm is fooling no one.
There is no such thing as natural law and it's usage is still a recognition of a higher being or force driving the natural world...which does not exist.
The only natural laws are those of biology, physics, chemistry, geology, etc. And they are driven by nothing but natural forces, not some higher power.
You should really give this attempted argument up, someone calls you out on it everytime.
Lursa said:Would gay couples have to be 'caught in the act' to be prosecuted?
Unless there was other proof.
Like what?
Your obsession with my religion is not relevant to anything that's been said.
Your obsession with my religion is not relevant to anything that's been said.
A confession, a recording, etc.
Of course it is. I just removed the whole 'natural law' mumbo jumbo as legitimate support for your argument. Because there's nothing legitimate about it.
It sure as hell is.
Ah good. So a gay couple living together just the same as straight couples would not be persecuted by the authorities. Nice to know.
Only if they kept it secret . . .
This isn't about Catholicism, no matter how much you want it to be.
So you lied then? 2 gay men or women living together would be prosecuted? Without any evidence of sexual activity?
Meh, then whatever distorted, repressive, and depressing religion you've chosen to devote yourself too.
The Westboro Church claims to be affiliated with Christianity and there's zero Christianity in their appalling and malicious acts or beliefs.
So you're asking about if they were openly homosexual partners, but denied having sex?
What is 'openly homosexual' about 2 people of the same sex living together? Why would they be asked if they had sex? Would you ask a heterosexual couple living together? Oh wait, if they werent married you'd have them stoned too, right?
I assumed you meant two people who were openly homosexual. If two men are living together, there's nothing suspicious about that. I don't think simple fornication should be punishable by death. It should be punished less severely.
What is 'openly homosexual?' And if they did hold hands or something...then they would be persecuted? And prosecuted?
For having a relationship that harms no one? Yeah, I want to join YOUR religion :doh
Myself, I think this argument is as crazy as an outhouse rat.
How does the accuser know this?
Well there should be a law against that sort of propaganda.
What about sexual positions other than missionary?
Of course they do. Gay people reproduce naturally all the time and also use other means to add children to their families
Altho married gays probably have a better chance of adopting, just like married straight people, so they will likely expand the pool of people looking to adopt and there may be less abortions because of that.
He desires Old Testament Biblical law.
People like him must be in absolute agony living in the US :mrgreen:
Oh ... ick.
I'm in favor of all sexual activity outside marriage, as well as any within marriage which involves force, contraception, or sodomy being outlawed.
I think the appropriate penalty would vary depending on the heinousness of the act. Incest, sodomy, rape, and adultery should probably carry a maximum penalty of death. While seduction and simple fornication should probably be punished with lighter penalties.
People like him must be in absolute agony living in the 21st century.
it's nothing that can't be cured with a lil sodomy..
the death penalty for a blowjob?...are you ****ing kidding me?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?