- Joined
- Aug 1, 2014
- Messages
- 26,719
- Reaction score
- 6,278
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
A new working paper by Neil Malhotra of Stanford's Graduate School of Business, and David Rothschild of Microsoft Research, shows that some voters do, in fact, switch sides in an effort to feel accepted and to be part of a winning team.
The researchers asked a selected group of voters to state their opinions on a variety of real public policy questions, and then presented them with fabricated poll results on the same topics. When the test subjects learned that a large number of experts favored a position, opinions shifted by 11.3%. But the "opinions of people like me" changed opinions by just 6.2%, while a general poll saying that a majority of people favored one side or the other moved the needle by 8.1%.
From Stanford University:
This is why the media puts new voting polls in our faces every day, because Hillary needs all the help she can get. And the media have shown themselves to be completely biased and unfair in their coverage of political elections.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/how-polls-influence-behavior
From Stanford University:
This is why the media puts new voting polls in our faces every day, because Hillary needs all the help she can get. And the media have shown themselves to be completely biased and unfair in their coverage of political elections.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/how-polls-influence-behavior
At the time, officials expressed concern that some of the materials in her private inbox were classified at some level, suggesting possible mishandling of sensitive information.
Email story won’t end for Clinton
We can go on and on about the FBI's criminal investigation, the fact that there are certain superdelegates that are either in jail or facing their own criminal investigation, or their lobbying ties. But this election is about to get even more bizarre.
Stanford Study Proves Election Fraud through Exit Poll Discrepancies : snopes.com
Not so much a study as a couple students (probably Sandernistas) who do not understand basic science, making claims not supported by the evidence, using numbers from a Conspiricy theorist(JFK type), reviewed by one of the students dad. Not that you will let any of those details derail your wild asses notions.
Stanford Study Proves Election Fraud through Exit Poll Discrepancies : snopes.com
Not so much a study as a couple students (probably Sandernistas) who do not understand basic science, making claims not supported by the evidence, using numbers from a Conspiricy theorist(JFK type), reviewed by one of the students dad. Not that you will let any of those details derail your wild asses notions.
Isn't it amazing how pretty much no one in this thread is actually interested in facts? They just get in the way of ranting against their perceived enemies...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?