The source itself is not credible pretty much everyone except liberals that read it.
If you think is is credible then so is drudge and breitbart as they are about the same.
Just the title is wrong in general.
From what I scanned just more hyperbolic nonsense drivel which is typical.
So no one isn't looting America that is the first thing wrong.
Making our country more competitive in a global economy is a good hung not a bad thing.
Our corporate rate is now in line with the rest of the world.
You seem to have a problem with that. More job investment into the economy is a good thing.
The article has a problem with that as well.
Not sure why. More business = more jobs more jobs = worker demand = higher pay.
More over blown nonsense on the death tax which is just wealth jealousy.
Republican tax bills have too many loopholes for shipping jobs overseas | TheHillWhen the Trump administration issued its framework for tax reform in September, it emphasized the need to build in protections to stop U.S. multinational corporations from “shipping jobs and capital overseas.” These protections were needed because the framework proposed that the United States move from a system of taxing the global profits of U.S. firms to a territorial system, under which their profits would be taxed only in the country where they were earned.
In a territorial system, U.S. corporations would have a strong incentive to move jobs and capital to low or no tax jurisdictions, as compared to a proposed corporate tax rate of 20 percent on U.S. profits.
So you favor encouraging more companies to relocate in even lower tax countries overseas where they now will not pay a dime in U.S. taxes?
Why would they? It makes no sense. Slippery slope fallacy is just that.
He countries that might be lower they really don't want to go for obvious reasons.
Let’s illustrate the problems with the aggregate approach by a simple example. Suppose a U.S. multinational had an aggregate tax rate of 24 percent per year on $1 billion of foreign profits, since they were derived primarily from high tax countries like France and Japan. After this tax bill is enacted into law, the U.S. multinational decides to build factories in Singapore producing $500 million profits per year subject to a tax of 8 percent, and to generate $500 million in profits from intellectual property in Bermuda where they would not be taxed at all.
LOL Yea Because companies don't like to save money on taxes...
Republican tax bills have too many loopholes for shipping jobs overseas | TheHill
Vox is another liberal rag site like daily kos or media matters.
The source is bunk and crap.
I love how liberals rail against drudge or breitbart but have no problem
Posting liberal hacks sites like vox or motherjones.
The article is a bit partisan and hyperbolic (I don't frequent Vox), to be fair.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/19/16786006/looting-of-america
I've said a few times in the last week or so that I think the Republican party has all but given up on 2018, and they're just shamelessly pushing whatever they can, while they can. It's a sad state American Politics has found itself in, and it's sad that less than a year into Trumps presidency that line is already old, tired, and worn out. I also recently stated that corporate America owns our government. I was wrong. Corporate America runs our government. It costs them less that way, and they don't have to worry about going down with the ship. They just need enough time to loot it. They know time is running out , and now don't even seem to be worried about repercussions, political or otherwise. A biggly section of the Republican party seem to be shamelessly cashing in at the cost of the parties future. The voices of reason in the party are few enough that they're basically throwing sand against the tide.
Seeking confirmation bias is not unusual but most media bias is by omission.
The NYT is a prime example with their "all the news that's fit to print" slogan - who, exactly, decides what events and facts are "fit" to report?
Obviously, no news source has the staff or bandwidth necessary to report everything but when only one side of a story is presented repeatedly then it becomes fairly clear that bias, rather than resource availability, is the likely cause of such lack of balanced content.
Still nothing typical ol well you had a chance as I said have a nice day.
Seeking confirmation bias is not unusual but most media bias is by omission.
The NYT is a prime example with their "all the news that's fit to print" slogan - who, exactly, decides what events and facts are "fit" to report?
Obviously, no news source has the staff or bandwidth necessary to report everything but when only one side of a story is presented repeatedly then it becomes fairly clear that bias, rather than resource availability, is the likely cause of such lack of balanced content.
The constant bickering and fighting between the Republican party and the Democratic party is actually there to serve to distract us from the true reality of the Uber Rich taking advantage of all of us. :2wave:
We aren't smart enough to sort it all out.
If by "we" you mean Trump supporters I would agree. They are not only "not smart" they have become zombies who only believe what they are told on FOX news.
:roll:
Who was it that was "smart" enough to run Hillary?
The article is a bit partisan and hyperbolic (I don't frequent Vox), to be fair.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/19/16786006/looting-of-america
I've said a few times in the last week or so that I think the Republican party has all but given up on 2018, and they're just shamelessly pushing whatever they can, while they can. It's a sad state American Politics has found itself in, and it's sad that less than a year into Trumps presidency that line is already old, tired, and worn out. I also recently stated that corporate America owns our government. I was wrong. Corporate America runs our government. It costs them less that way, and they don't have to worry about going down with the ship. They just need enough time to loot it. They know time is running out , and now don't even seem to be worried about repercussions, political or otherwise. A biggly section of the Republican party seem to be shamelessly cashing in at the cost of the parties future. The voices of reason in the party are few enough that they're basically throwing sand against the tide.
Trump is far worse than Hillary in every way. She would not have signed a tax giveaway for the rich either.
Hillary and the rest of the Clinton criminal cartel would have sold us out to the Russians by now.
The Clintons and the Obama's have been so good for the Democratic party. They have lost more than 1,000 seats in Federal and States Governments. :2wave:
A serial rapist and an incompetent and lying criminal loosing POTUS candidate are something to be proud of...
The article is a bit partisan and hyperbolic (I don't frequent Vox), to be fair.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/12/19/16786006/looting-of-america
I've said a few times in the last week or so that I think the Republican party has all but given up on 2018, and they're just shamelessly pushing whatever they can, while they can. It's a sad state American Politics has found itself in, and it's sad that less than a year into Trumps presidency that line is already old, tired, and worn out. I also recently stated that corporate America owns our government. I was wrong. Corporate America runs our government. It costs them less that way, and they don't have to worry about going down with the ship. They just need enough time to loot it. They know time is running out , and now don't even seem to be worried about repercussions, political or otherwise. A biggly section of the Republican party seem to be shamelessly cashing in at the cost of the parties future. The voices of reason in the party are few enough that they're basically throwing sand against the tide.
LOL Trump has already sold out to Putin. He has no choice either. Putin owns him.
The landscape will be changing in November. Trump is likely to be out by then too.:lol:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?