- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 25,357
- Reaction score
- 11,557
- Location
- Post-Trump America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
The House Intelligence Committee voted unanimously Thursday to turn over a transcript of Roger Stone’s testimony to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III — a key step that would assist prosecutors if they decide to pursue charges in their investigation of the longtime Trump adviser.
This would be the prove that Stone lied among other things...
House intelligence committee votes to turn over transcript of Roger Stone testimony to special counsel
The GOP-led committee’s decision Thursday to accede with his request indicates that while Republicans have followed Trump’s lead in attacking the Mueller probe, they are not willing to take formal action to block the ongoing Russia investigation.
Hmmmm......Republicans gone wild.
Actually in all seriousness, I'm glad they did this. I'll give them credit. This was the right move.
This would be the proof that Stone lied among other things...
House intelligence committee votes to turn over transcript of Roger Stone testimony to special counsel
Good. That would have been a bombshell if not...and futile since in January it could probably have been done anyway.
I wonder if Nunes offered any resistance before agreeing to vote with the consensus.
They had Nunes over a barrel and he and everyone else knew it.
Good. That would have been a bombshell if not...and futile since in January it could probably have been done anyway.
I wonder if Nunes offered any resistance before agreeing to vote with the consensus.
On Friday, Mueller requested an official transcript of Stone’s 2017 testimony — the first time that the special counsel had asked the committee to turn over material the panel has gathered during its investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 campaign. Mueller has had access to an unofficial copy of Stone’s testimony for weeks, but legal experts said he would need a certified copy provided by the committee if he wished to use the document to seek an indictment.
Yep, Stone is toast. At least until pardoned.I wondered why they had to vote, instead of just giving him the transcript. According to the article, they had already given Mueller a copy, but he would need an official copy in order to begin any legal action.
Nunes & Rohrabacher, for sure. They're both dirty as hell, from where I sit.I hope Nunes goes down too! Wonder why very little opposition??? I thought Stone was King of blackmail???
Nunes & Rohrabacher, for sure. They're both dirty as hell, from where I sit.
I'm a bit surprised at this, to be honest. It would have been in character for them (Repubs) to make Pelosi wait until Jan 3rd.
My concern was not that Mueller would get his materials, but whether they would be accurate and factually representative.
I hope Nunes goes down too! Wonder why very little opposition??? I thought Stone was King of blackmail???
That I'm not aware of, but he does seme up to his eyes in Russia stuff.Rohrabacher almost certainly boinked Russian Spy Bunny Maria Butina.
That I'm not aware of, but he does seme up to his eyes in Russia stuff.
The problem I have is, is this is always argued by GOP and Trump supporters in terms of law & legality. In other words, is it legal for Dana Rohrabacher to have these relationships? When did this become the standard? When did it become O.K. for our government officials, including the President, to commingle and cooperate and attach themselves to Russians and Russian interests in this manner?
I feel like a Cold War artifact. I cannot even vaguely imagine why these actions are not the political kiss of death for anyone involved. I'm completely stymied in my understanding of the current American body politic.
They would make great cell mates.
My concern was not that Mueller would get his materials, but whether they would be accurate and factually representative.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?