The truth gives some people headaches. That sucks for them, but tough shit.Say someone takes a position on an issue that seems like utter nonsense to you to the point that merely trying to decipher it gives you a headache. Therefore, you don't bother responding to it.
Should the position, therefore, be upheld by default?
Would most reasonable people also find the argument indecipherable?Say someone takes a position on an issue that seems like utter nonsense to you to the point that merely trying to decipher it gives you a headache. Therefore, you don't bother responding to it.
Should the position, therefore, be upheld by default?
Say someone takes a position on an issue that seems like utter nonsense to you to the point that merely trying to decipher it gives you a headache. Therefore, you don't bother responding to it.
Should the position, therefore, be upheld by default?
Compound falsehoods also give people headaches as well as statements which are not even wrong.The truth gives some people headaches. That sucks for them, but tough shit.
What if your community is trying to figure out what's reasonable in the first place?Would most reasonable people also find the argument indecipherable?
I'm not talking about posts here.View attachment 67367756
A. Your (or my) lack of response doesn't matter to the post. It's correct or incorrect on its own merits.
2. Reading someone's point of view, no matter how ****ed up, has never actually giv n me a headache.
III. Nothing meaningful as far as decisions actually happens here. We're just a buncha loud-mouths sounding off.
STAnd up and fight, man! Don't let these people walk all over you. Vote, vote, vote!I'm not talking about posts here.
I'm talking about people coming up with insane policies in real life, and then saying that because nobody opposed them, they're allowed to implement them.
Speak for yourself Romeo.The headache defense has been used for millennia by women to deny sex to their husbands. Old news I'm afraid.
The headache defense has been used for millennia by women to deny sex to their husbands. Old news I'm afraid.
The point is people live busy lives. We don't have a limitless amount of time, energy, and attention to go around correcting other people's mistakes.STAnd up and fight, man! Don't let these people walk all over you. Vote, vote, vote!
I referred to reasonable people, not reasonable ideas.What if your community is trying to figure out what's reasonable in the first place?
Women like sex, too. The whole life as we know it on Earth wouldn't have happened otherwise. And women don't have sex any more frequently. So if a wife is saying that, chances are it's something else and the something else also explains why she doesn't want to tell you the *real* reason she isn't interested. Further, I'd suggest that the whole "headache" excuse may belie other problems.
"I'm really not in the mood right now" should suffice, see? So if the wife needs an excuse....
Or bothering to debate it-----no sense in respondingSay someone takes a position on an issue that seems like utter nonsense to you to the point that merely trying to decipher it gives you a headache. Therefore, you don't bother responding to it.
Should the position, therefore, be upheld by default?
A. Your (or my) lack of response doesn't matter to the post. It's correct or incorrect on its own merits.
2. Reading someone's point of view, no matter how ****ed up, has never actually giv n me a headache.
III. Nothing meaningful as far as decisions actually happens here. We're just a buncha loud-mouths sounding off.
You're stronger than I. I've read several points of view that have practically left me incapable of thought for several minutes. For example:Reading someone's point of view, no matter how ****ed up, has never actually giv n me a headache.
Oh, there are definitely moments of severe "derp" happening here.You're stronger than I. I've read several points of view that have practically left me incapable of thought for several minutes. For example:
Are atheists a danger to women? Why an atheist can't be a feminist
If one is an atheist, then they can't believe in any mythical notions (whether archaic chivalry or contemporary women's rights) anymore than they can in a God. If they do, then it's solely based on faith and the appropriation of religious and cultural values which form our notions of women's...debatepolitics.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?