• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Guardian comments about RFK's child health report

Noting things like how it omits how Republicans have harmed children's health, important issues, and has 'crackpot' things.


You know though, in general I like a lot of this stuff. Or, at least having it researched and/or labeled.

Food dyes, pesticides, childhood meds, and highly processed foods, are all things I think we should look at.

OTOH, he's nuts for dropping fluoride.
 
You know though, in general I like a lot of this stuff. Or, at least having it researched and/or labeled.

Food dyes, pesticides, childhood meds, and highly processed foods, are all things I think we should look at.

OTOH, he's nuts for dropping fluoride.
They commented it has good and bad in it. I think that's correct.
 
They commented it has good and bad in it. I think that's correct.

Yeah. but here's where the problem will likely lie:

Like so many things MAGA, the overarching general idea may have some merit. But the implementation will be unacceptable!
 
I think the concern is not that those aren’t important issues, but that making those the only top issues when statistically they aren’t.
This is pseudoscience.

Guns are the major cause of death in American children. More than even cancer. Why isn’t anyone talking about that?

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom