The election was rigged.... Hmmmm

[element94]

Trump

Please provide your proof of massive electoral fraud that you have been promising to reveal for 5 years. Until then your comments on voting are not considered credible by Americans and thus are summarily Dismissed.

Bye.

It's all to help child rapists.

 

[mike2810]

Do you actually know what that case was about...or when it took place?

Tell me...do you really think this is "breaking news"?

I have my doubts you do.

Do you know what the case was about?

If you do please inform us with a link .

 

[mike2810]

Zapata defense was she was a whistle blower regarding a flaw in the voting system. a witness for the prosecution summed it up as,
"It’s also a case that Atiba Ellis, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, said was “rare, bordering on unheard of.”

“Ordinarily, election administrators who see flaws in systems raise those flaws and those become the object of legislation,” Ellis said. “But for an election administrator to undertake the act of requesting a fake ballot in order to prove that election fraud can happen is simply unheard of.”


"Kimberly Zapata, the former deputy director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, was also found guilty of misconduct in public office, a felony, after she admitted to using fake names to request military absentee ballots on her work laptop in 2022. Zapata then sent those ballots to the home of Republican state Rep. Janel Brandtjen, who was promoting false theories about election fraud.

Zapata, 47, has been on trial in Milwaukee County since Monday. After deliberating for around five hours following closing arguments Wednesday morning, Zapata appeared quiet in court while Milwaukee County judge Ashley Kori read the decision of the jury.

Jury finds former Milwaukee election official guilty of election fraud

A Milwaukee County jury found former election official Kimberly Zapata guilty of election fraud involving absentee ballots Wednesday afternoon.

www.wpr.org

Ellis, the law professor, said more cases like this are popping up across the nation following the 2020 election. A report from The Associated Press found fewer than 475 potential instances of voter fraud out of more than 25 million votes cast in the 2020 election. Ellis said other errors in voting systems can usually be attributed to human error.

“These sorts of issues are always almost simple errors and there’s usually not a kind of intent,” Ellis said. “Most cases where voter fraud has been prosecuted has been usually by political operatives who are trying to make the point that there is a way to game the system.”

In Wisconsin, that includes Harry Wait, who is now facing felony charges for requesting absentee ballots using Vos’ name and address without permission in 2022. At the time, he said he did so to show vulnerabilities in the state’s online voter portal system. Wait, who is a volunteer organizer in the recall effort against Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, will appear in court in August for an evidentiary hearing.

Seems Zapata used bad judgement. In the end it was still voter fraud.

 

[Mycroft]

Do you know what the case was about?

Yes.

If you do please inform us with a link .

I was going to tell you to look it up yourself, but I see you already did. Good for you.

 

[mike2810]

Yes.

sure. That is why you didn't post a link.

Look it up yourself.

Better yet, tell the OP to look it up for you.

I have. See my other post.

At least I backed up what I post with links to support what is posted. Can't say you do the same.

 

[Cosmik Debris]

Weren't we told voter fraud was a non-existent problem?

No.

 

[Mycroft]

sure. That is why you didn't post a link.

I don't need to post a link when I'm asking the OP a question.

And I didn't post a link when you demanded one because 1) I'm not going to do your work for you and 2) after you demanded a link from me, you went ahead and did your own work.

 

[Plasmaball]

Weren't we told voter fraud was a non-existent problem?

No you where not.
You done now?

 

[mike2810]

I don't need to post a link when I'm asking the OP a question.

And I didn't post a link when you demanded one because 1) I'm not going to do your work for you and 2) after you demanded a link from me, you went ahead and did your own work.

yes I did. because I knew you would not provide one.
The reason I ask you for links is to see what source and information you are using to support your position.

So, what is your take on the case. Was it voter fraud based on the law?

 

[Mycroft]

yes I did. because I knew you would not provide one.
The reason I ask you for links is to see what source and information you are using to support your position.

My position? What position?

So, what is your take on the case. Was it voter fraud based on the law?

She was dumb to do it.

 

[mike2810]

My position? What position?

my mistake, It is clear you do not have a position on anything you post.

She was dumb to do it.

Agree.
There are better ways to point out flaws in voting systems.

 

[NatMorton]

No you where not.
You done now?

Try reading the thread.

 

[Plasmaball]

Try reading the thread.

I did. I had a sad that you attempted to spin this bullshit more

 

[NatMorton]

I did. I had a sad that you attempted to spin this bullshit more

You're either fibbing or you don't read very well. There are several people in this thread that have stated voter fraud is so negligible that it's not a problem. For example, posts #4 and #9.

 

[Plasmaball]

You're either fibbing or you don't read very well. There are several people in this thread that have stated voter fraud is so negligible that it's not a problem. For example, posts #4 and #9.

Uh huh and thats not what you said.
Moving goal posts to have a point.
Have a good one nat. Im not interested in wasting my time here

 

[NatMorton]

Uh huh and thats not what you said.
Moving goal posts to have a point.
Have a good one nat. Im not interested in wasting my time here

I get the sense most of your time here is wasted.