- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 35,181
- Reaction score
- 15,234
- Location
- Springfield MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Pounding your own chest again. Then in that link, you dflat out lie about what my claims are.
Unlike you, I am not insecure, and I do not need to try to prove others wrong. You even lie about proving people wrong.
the only what your claims appear to prove me wrong, is by lying about what I have said. Every one of those claims in the link do not accurately reflect what I said.
You do this over and over. Why haven't you learned yet?
That's your way of doing things.
Why can't you accurately recount my words?
Why do you misrepresent what I say? Is it intellectual deception, or ignorance?
We have been through this countless times, and you continue to twist my words.
The fact that you are incapable of properly repeating what I say, and crafting it into a win for you, shows just of dishonest you are.
You improperly paraphrased my words.Why do you insist on lying?
I provided examples and links to what you have said so anyone can go and see for themselves what was said and whether or not I proved you wrong or not.
Your not fooling anyone that is willing to go look for themselves.
You improperly paraphrased my words.
That is a lie, when it doesn't properly reflect my words. I ask that you stop being so dishonorable.
Well, it's pretty certain that doing nothing WILL NOT CHANGE IT.Pray tell, what exactly do you think would change this? Buy an electric car?
Severe drought, fires, dried up reservoirs here in Portugal. It's very frightening.Britain is experiencing unprecedented drought, as is much of Western Europe, to include France and Spain.
Prove it.You improperly paraphrased my words.
That is a lie, when it doesn't properly reflect my words. I ask that you stop being so dishonorable.
I have no need to prove squat. I'm not someone who has to prove others wrong to feel good about my self like you do.Prove it.
Oh, that's right... you are all talk and no proof.
No... you just bully people and tell everyone how you know so much more than everyone else.I have no need to prove squat. I'm not someone who has to prove others wrong to feel good about my self like you do.
One somewhat cool side to that:The Danube river is low....
Key point.One somewhat cool side to that:
Low water levels on Danube reveal sunken WW2 German warships
Europe's worst drought in years has pushed the mighty river Danube to one of its lowest levels in almost a century, exposing the hulks of dozens of explosives-laden German warships sunk during World War Two near Serbia's river port town of Prahovo.www.reuters.com
Key point.
Notice they say the worse drought in years. Not the worse drought ever.
Because you guys keep trying to say such reasons are why we must act immediately, squander money on problems that we may have no control over.So what?
Because you guys keep trying to say such reasons are why we must act immediately, squander money on problems that we may have no control over.
Once again, nothing to add to the debate. Only pot shots at me.Denier talking points.
Once again, nothing to add to the debate. Only pot shots at me.
And there you go again, slandering me.Say something new. Say something interesting. Your standard denier talking points got tiresome eons ago.
“Squander money” is an emotion-based phrase, not a thoughtful debate point.
What??? What they concluded in the early 80s -- people who worked for Exxon -- is EXACTLY what is happening today. Nothing to counter, LOL -- we have all the evidence we need. And, without a shred of doubt, the excess of CO2 in our atmosphere is what is causing the climate change we are experiencing today.The problem is, the conclusions they came to were nothing concrete. Not quantified. This is the problem. The AGW side considers this settled, and everyone else wrong.
THAT IS NOT SCIENCE!
The "worst" drought in years as opposed to the "worst" drought ever means we don't need to take immediate action? How? We have been abusing the planet for centuries. There is no time like now to reverse this behavior. There's just no excuse to continue with the abuse.Once again, nothing to add to the debate. Only pot shots at me.
That's not exactly how I would word it. I'm simply saying that it is flat out stupid to blame our actions for something that is possibly just natural.The "worst" drought in years as opposed to the "worst" drought ever means we don't need to take immediate action? How? We have been abusing the planet for centuries. There is no time like now to reverse this behavior. There's just no excuse to continue with the abuse.
I'm saying it's flat out stupid to quibble over 'worst in years' vs 'worst ever' OR 'possibly just natural' when the planet is obviously being badly abused and there are clearly many things we SHOULD be doing, no matter how you want to parse the bullshit.That's not exactly how I would word it. I'm simply saying that it is flat out stupid to blame our actions for something that is possibly just natural.
Yes, we are damaging the planet. I focus on land use changes and actually pollution. For the agenda to be only focusing on greenhouse gasses, is a joke.I'm saying it's flat out stupid to quibble over 'worst in years' vs 'worst ever' OR 'possibly just natural' when the planet is obviously being badly abused and there are clearly many things we SHOULD be doing, no matter how you want to parse the bullshit.
It is not a joke when most of the warming is being caused by the GHGs. Your insistence that land use changes and pollution are causing more warming than GHGs just isn't supported by the science.Yes, we are damaging the planet. I focus on land use changes and actually pollution. For the agenda to be only focusing on greenhouse gasses, is a joke.
Can you say "Irritant?" Are you proud of you obnoxious nature?It is not a joke when most of the warming is being caused by the GHGs. Your insistence that land use changes and pollution are causing more warming than GHGs just isn't supported by the science.
Do you think I am wrong? Then prove it.
Oh, that's right... you can almost never prove anything because you are all talk and no proof.
If my fact-based and science-supported debunking of AGW denialism is irritating to you then you are obviously an AGW denialist.Can you say "Irritant?" Are you proud of you obnoxious nature?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?