- Joined
- Jul 23, 2018
- Messages
- 47,264
- Reaction score
- 37,271
- Location
- Zeb's Mountain
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
The Bible is a book of inspired truths. It is NOT a history book per se.......Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
I think so...our beliefs about the trinity, hellfire, the immortal soul, the great crowd living on the earth, and the 144,000 were all determined using the KJV...granted, it takes digging deeper but the truth is still there...Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
I think so...our beliefs about the trinity, hellfire, the immortal soul, the great crowd living on the earth, and the 144,000 were all determined using the KJV...granted, it takes digging deeper but the truth is still there...
Actually, they'd have to figure out which sect of Christianity is factually 'right' before they go challenge other denominations - which, from reading these threads & the arguments between the different adherents, will happen any minute now.Yes, your beliefs came from the bible. Not the same as saying the bible proves itself to be factual truth. Other beliefs came from other religious texts. What makes your chosen book any more factual than all the others?
No because that would be circular reasoning.Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
My sister explained it this way: Many men who never communicated with each other wrote it over many years, but they all wrote the same message.
Except that's not actually true.
Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
Prove it with the Bible.
You have that backwards. YOUR SISTER has to prove that what she said is true WITHOUT the bible.
The question is about using the Bible to prove itself. So if you want to disprove the Bible, you must only use the Bible to show me exactly were it disproves itself.
You have to read the entire Bible to even start to come close to any possible evidence the Bible might prove itself wrong.
The Bible is a compilation of religious literature, meant to be inspired by God. That doesn't mean everything in it is true. You can be inspired by God and still get things wrong.Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
Nope. The Bible cannot be used to prove the Bible right, any more than Return of the Jedi can be used to prove that the Death Star exists.Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
Can the Bible ( any version ) be used to prove the the Bible to be factual truth? Why, or why not? State your case.
No because that would be circular reasoning.
The Bible says "we are superior" to ourselves? Because "we" ARE "animals!" ( biological fact )<<< Like for example, the Bible says we are superior to animals! >>>
Before the bible can prove it self to be true, it has to be assumed that it is true, thus circular reasoning.Can you please explain how is that "circular" reasoning?
That you don’t understand this isn’t shocking.Can you please explain how is that "circular" reasoning?
The Bible says "we are superior" to ourselves? Because "we" ARE "animals!" ( biological fact )
My wife, just to "name" one.<<< Can you name an animal that you consider to be your equal?
That you don’t understand this isn’t shocking.
Not even a little.
Nope. The Bible cannot be used to prove the Bible right, any more than Return of the Jedi can be used to prove that the Death Star exists.
My wife, just to "name" one.